Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, Apologies for bringing up the same topic regarding these individuals. I wish I had found this forum earlier, as I've seen very similar cases. However, I need your help in figuring out what to do next because we've involved our partners/resellers. I work as an IT Manager in a company outside of the UK. We acquired a license from a certified reseller (along with a support agreement) and also obtained training sessions from them. The issue arose when we needed to register two people for the training sessions, so we used an external laptop for the second user to keep up with the sessions for only a month. During this period, the laptop was solely used for the training sessions. After two weeks, my boss forwarded an email to me from Ms Vinces, stating that we are using illicit software from SolidWorks. Since this has never happened to me or anyone we know, I went into panic mode and had a meeting with her. During the meeting, we explained that we were using an external laptop solely for the training sessions and that the laptop had not been used within the company since her email. She informed us that for such cases, there are demos and special licenses (though our reseller did not mention these types of licenses when we made our initial purchase). She then mentioned that we had utilized products worth approximately €25k and presented us with two options: either pay the agreed value or acquire SolidWorks products. We expressed that the cost was too high, and our business couldn't support such expenses. I assured her that we would discuss the matter with the company board and get back to her. After the meeting, we contacted the company reseller from whom we purchased the license, explained the situation, and mentioned the use of an external laptop. They said they would speak to Maria and help mediate the situation. We hoped to significantly reduce the cost, perhaps to that of a 1-year professional license. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The reseller mediated a value €2k less than what Maria had suggested (essentially, we would need to acquire two professional lifetime licenses and two years of support for a total of €23k). This amount is still beyond our means, but they insisted that the price was non-negotiable and wouldn't be reduced any further. The entire situation feels odd because she never provided us with addresses or other evidence (which I should have requested), and she's pressuring us to resolve the matter by the end of the month, with payment to be made through the reseller. This makes me feel as though the reseller is taking advantage of the situation to profit from it. Currently, we're trying to buy some time. We plan to meet with the reseller next week but are uncertain about how to proceed with them or whether we should respond to the mediator.
    • Thanks London  if I’ve read correctly the questionaire wants me to post his actual name on a public forum… is that correct.  I’ve only had a quick read so far
    • Plenty of success stories, also bear in mind not everyone updates the forum.  Overdale's want you to roll over and pay, without using your enshrined legal right to defend. make you wet yourself in fear that a solicitor will Take you to court, so you will pay up without question. Most people do just that,  but you are lucky that you have found this place and can help you put together a good defence. You should get reading on some other Capital One and Overdale's cases on the forum to get an idea of how it works.  
    • In both versions the three references to "your clients" near the end need to be changed to "you" or "your" as Alliance are not using solicitors, they have sent the LoC themselves. Personally I'd change "Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept" to "Dear Kev".  It would show you'd done your homework, looked up the company, and seen it's a pathetic one-man band rather than having any departments.  The PPCs love to pretend they have some official power and so you should be scared of them - showing you've sussed their sordid games and you're confident about fighting them undermines all this.  In fact that's the whole point of a snotty letter - to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did do court so better to drop you like a hot potato and go and pursue mugs who just give in instead. In the very, very, very, very unlikely case of Kev doing court, it'd be better that he didn't know in advance all the legal arguments you'd be using, so I'd heavily reduce the number of cards being played.
    • Thanx Londoneill get on to it this evening having a read around these forums I can’t seem to find many success stories using your methods. So how successful are these methods or am I just buying time for him  and a ccj will be inevitable in the end. Thanks another question is, will he have to appear at court..? I am not sure he has got it in him
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA Tribunal Aid - Practical and Mental?


Sura
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4437 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I only have recieved the evidence pack, no forms.

 

I guess I'll wait. Thank you.

 

Hello again.

 

I'm still not sure what forms they were talking about. Would you mind confirming please, you've sent off a GL24 or a letter saying you want the DWP to reconsider their decision about your ESA and they've said no?

 

I'm happy to be corrected, but I thought the next step was the tribunal.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what's happened so far;

 

I attended a medical.

I recieved my letter saying I scored 0.

I filled in a 'Why you think we are wrong,' form and wrote a letter stating I'd like to appeal and why. I sent it off with my GP's letter.

I recieved a pack last Thursdsay stating a Decission Maker has refused to look over my appeal and so the decission is still 0 points. The pack contains a copy of everything so far, my letter, ESA50, ATOS report, etc.

On the front of the pack is a letter with Tribunal addresses but no dates and no information of what to do next.

It states I should be expecting some 'forms for my completion' within '2 weeks of the submission.' ?

 

Maybe that'll help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

Does it say the DM [decision maker] refused to look at your appeal [request for reconsideration], or that they looked at it and refused to change the decision please?

 

I'm still confused about the forms, I would have thought the next thing would be a tribunal date, but maybe not very soon. But the pack they've sent you sounds like the documents you need to mount your case against the decision not to reconsider.

 

Is there a name on the letter of someone you could ring to check what else they're sending you and if your papers have been/will be sent to the Tribunals Service?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just a bit concerned that you waiting for forms that might not arrive, not sure what forms they are, will mean you have missed the deadline to tell them you are appealing. If it were me I would just write and say I am appealing and state why, again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't a phone number but I'm guessing I could ring the DWP and try and work my way through the Hold times and try and get some info! I'm also worried I'm waiting on forms that may never come.

 

I'm unsure, HB. The sheet at the back of the pack has the 'Revision refused' box ticked, and the statement from the DM says 'There was no additional evidence provided and I saw no break in the law.' That's all I know.

 

I'm going to go ahead and collect some evidence, and I've already made a list of things I can't do and worked on the score I think I should gain from their criteria. I've also annitated the ATOS report, outlining where the doctor has contridicted himself, lied, noted down undiscussed matters or given vague/twisted answers. :/ (Which was quite shocking, but more common after reading everyone's posts on here!) So I am fully prepared to appeal again or make a case for Tribunal either way...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sura,

 

I've been through this before.

 

First off, there are no other forms to wait for.

 

From what you're posted, you've sent in your appeal, it's been reconsidered by the DWP and the DWP DM has refused the reconsideration.

 

You're now at the stage where you prepare your written submission to the Tribunal Service, and gather evidence.

 

Secondly, forget about phoning the DWP. It's better to do everything in writing (as you have been doing), so you continue the 'paper trail'.

 

Don't be fearful of the CAB / Welfare Rights. Their job is to assist you. Let them help.

 

I was nervous about going through it all with the CAB / Community Legal Service lady, but she couldn't have been nicer. She's taken a lot of stress away, just by writing to the DWP / ATOS / The TS on my behalf (I'd prepared my own submission to send as well).

 

You're on the right track.

 

First things first. Tomorrow, make your appointment with the CAB for help with preparation / representation.

 

All the best, and good night.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your help.

 

I've had a few set backs - in that my Physiotherapist has moved hospitals and now I need to wait 2 weeks and start seeing a new one all together... I also don't have a GP appointment till the 23rd, but once I see those 2 people I can have my medical evidence.

 

I will also make a CAB appointment.. Just very nervous. :(

 

Is there a time limit on this like there is with the appeal process? A month?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Regarding the time limit on the appeal process, to give you an idea;

 

I had my Medical last June '11; Zero points in July; Reconsidered by DWP automatically in August; Still zero points; Appeal then submitted to Tribunal Service in September '11;

 

Still waiting for an appeal date!

 

TS have told me that they're currently confirming dates for appeals received by them last July.

 

So, I'm looking at another month - two months before my Hearing.

 

I have submitted my written statement via the CAB, who have in turn, sent it to the TS. Also sent in my GP's letter, and just waiting for one more letter now from a friend.

 

You can probably expect to wait at least six months.

 

However, the sooner you can see the CAB / gather supporting evidence the better, as you can then focus your energy into getting well.

 

About 70% of ESA Appeals are apparently successful at the Appeal stage, with representation.

 

Good Luck.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello!

 

Sorry for the late updates and all.

 

I have gotten someone from CAB involved, they've come round, spoke to me, looked over the case and the situation. She agreed the doctor's report looks suspisious.

 

However, she also says that if your partner is claiming carer's allowance, they can apply for income support and there's no need for anyone (at least with DLA/Carer's) to go through this...? I'm unsure how true or not that is. She suggested it to me because mine was not going to be a life-long problem, probably a year at most.

 

I don't know. I'm clueless.

 

If this expirience has taught me anything It's that the system is made to be played. It's like some sick game. If you don't know how to fill in a form 'correctly', it doesn't matter how honest you are, or how ill you are. They want specific sentances, terms, etc. It's... kind of scary, in honesty. And the types of help out there are split between those who will help you fail or those who will help you succeed, very few who will help you find what's best for you and your condition.

 

~

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...