Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So I am now in receipt of a second Letter of Claim this time from DCBL although their letter head now says " DCBLegal"  😱 Now I'm guessing one response to a letter of claim is sufficient and I could ignore this but having been inspired by other snotty letters I wanted to have another bash at one. How does this sound? Dear Lackeys of Company with Unconscionable Morals, Thank you ever so much for gracing me with yet another Letter Before Claim on behalf of Excel Parking Services. How many of these delightful missives do you plan on sending before you muster the courage to follow through on your threats to take me to court? Just so we're clear, here is the response (in italics by that I mean the slanted text below) I previously sent to Excel’s Letter Before Claim, in case your attention to detail is as lacking as I suspect: I am currently 2-0 up in terms of Small Claims Court proceedings and I look forward to the opportunity to claim a hat trick, this case being more straightforward than my previous two. I will be asking the court for an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) due to your conduct over this absurd claim. Despite my best efforts, you continue to assert that I have breached your terms. However, I cannot breach terms that I was not present to accept. Have you even read my initial response? I suggest you review it thoroughly and save yourself some money. Additionally, please refer to section 13 of the IPC Code of Practice, 2023 edition. I eagerly await your deafening silence. Remarkably, I haven't heard a peep from Excel since my response; instead, they've passed the baton to you to perform this tiresome routine once more. Consider this my official notice that I am sending a cease and desist letter to Excel Parking Services. Their relentless hounding has crossed the line into clear harassment. Any further demands for payment from you, as Excel's lackeys, will be regarded as nothing more than shameless acts of intimidation and harassment. I now look forward to the deafening sound of your silence. Yours sincerely,
    • Personally I'd go to it and object for the sake of it. They have to attend anyway so I can't see you being liable for any costs or anything (if they try to ask for attendance costs, just say that firstly it is their application, secondly it is from their own making, thirdly that they would have to come anyway so you shouldn't need to bear their costs.   When you turn up you should object on the basis that the witness has been in office since the time of the order, and could have done their witnes statement in advance of their AL. Their poor planning is not your fault, 7 days is too rushed for you as a LIP and there is no good reason that a company can't organise itself to sort WX in time. Also they say finalise so they already have something, its not like thye have nothing. Their amendments cannot be so important if they are being added so late.   see what @AndyOrch says but that's my thoughts  
    • Yes, in the main your understanding of my case is right. Linked below to the post with the final WS sent to the court and to Evri.   
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. As you say, appealing this ticket doesn't help as these people hardly ever accept appeals. They don't care how difficult someone's life is, they just want the money. The forum guys should be along later with thoughts for you on how to deal with this. Best, HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mortgage, CreditAgricole ,BirminghamMidshires, Halifa x, HBOS, CurtisSolicitors


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5615 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 322
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi TT!

 

Where've U been all my life??...:mad::p

 

Here's a link to my 1st ever Post on CAG I've just found again...

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/49329-bitter-soft-centres-anyone.html

...It kind of got lost in the mists of time somewhere!...:rolleyes:

 

We may have got to have gone on a journey together, if I hadn't had been so distracted by life?!...:(

 

Have only just recently received letters from a commissioned DCA about HBOS wanting the shortfall money.

I was planning to dodge 'n' weave until the 'alledged' debt became timeserved next year sometime.

Now after reading YOUR Thread, I suppose I'll have to put my thinking head back on again!...:rolleyes:

 

Best of luck in your own efforts!...;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

I've reached a point in my case where a part of it involves the undersale of my property and valuations performed.

 

HELP!!!!

 

If anybody believes their property has been undersold after repossession, I'd be grateful to hear from them.

 

I have Land Registry reports showing that my property was sold at less than 50% of others sold in the same area and same time period (quarter).

 

I'm particularly interested in disgraceful valuations, the Council of Mortgage Lenders guidelines and any precedents set which I could rely upon.

 

As far as I understand, there should be 3 independent valuations prior to sale (Council of Mortgage Lenders Guidelines).

 

If Colley's (owned by HBOS) performed the majority of them, are these independent?

 

Why was the identity of the valuers denied for 5 years?

 

Is there any association with other companies looking to pick up cheap properties when given the nod at great expense of those who are experiencing difficulties.

 

Please PM me if you don't want to post, all help appreciated.

 

Hunting....

 

Tide

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

what year are you talking about ? as the rules were only governed by the FSA from 2004

 

National debtline have a phone number for queries on selling price and valuations.

 

As I mentioned before I know there were certain rules when I worked for the Halifax in 1980s - but even then I think there may have been dodgy dealings within the Old boys club that none of us were aware of.

 

I would have thought if you can prove the sp was well below others at the time the onus should be on them to prove why and also that the agent was totally independant.

 

When I did google re-possessions a site came up - something like quick sale .co.uk - which gave tips on re-pos and mentioned that you should have received a letter within 28 days by re-corded delivery explaining all about the sale etc- but this may only be a recent rule.

 

If you give info on the BS and the year then maybe there is some archive material about.

 

Jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jan,

 

Repo was in 2001, sale early in 2002. I know the old boys sold it, and know exactly who they are. Problem is proving it without extracting a confession.

 

I'll look into the other points you raised, although as time goes on it seems to get harder. Building Society was Birmingham Midshires, sold by Halifax Property Services, valued by Colley's (all owned by HBOS). Sold to a local builder with close links to the manager of the estate agent.

 

Many thanks

 

Tide

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The fact that it was sold to a builder with links to the Bs is going to be difficult - as I understand that is common practice for these property developers to get the nod on any properties that are re-possessions in return for backhanders - extremely difficult to prove! I think your best angle is to try and find out if there was a perid of time when the property was marketed properly in national press /internet etc - Also to ask how many viewings and evidence of any other offers.

 

Also somehow they have to prove to you by sending you copies of the valuations that were done that they chose the best independant estate agent - if they have connections with the BS that owned the mortgage then they are not independant.

 

Do you still have any correspondence sent to you by the BS regarding the sale of the property?

 

Jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Found this as well

 

 

 

The property will be sold to pay off the mortgage. This is achieved by auction or traditional estate agent.

The lender has a legal obligation to achieve the best possible price within reason, but it will likely be less than the market value. Usually the property will go through an estate agent first, if that fails then it will go to auction where the value will probably be massively lower.

The sale price is used to pay off the mortgage, if there is surplus then you should receive that, but if the sale did not raise enough to pay off the mortgage then you are legally bound to pay the difference.

 

If the property is being sold by an estate agent then make sure:

 

  • You find out the exact date it was passed to an agent or agents.
  • There is a for sale sign outside the property, if there is no sign then take a date stamped photograph.
  • The property is in the estate agents window. If it isn't then go inside and ask for details about properties in that area, if it is mentioned then obtain the full details. If it is not listed then get the name of the sales person.
  • Check the sales details and note the value of similar properties in that area
  • Make sure the property is described accurately and mentions no upward chain or vacant possession. These are key positive sales factors that may help achieve a quicker sale.

Why go to this extent?

  • Every day the property is unsold adds interest to the debt
  • It prevents you moving on and costs you more.
  • Because the property is a repossession the estate agent has instructions to sell it quickly and therefore cheaply which means their commission would be less than for a similar one at market value.
  • If there are few buyers around, they will push the one that gives them more income.
  • Remember that estate agents usually are paid from sales commission rather than a basic salary.

Undervalued repossession properties

 

If you can prove the property has been undervalued, you can ask the courts for an injunction to prevent a sale. This can be done at any time before the completion date. Lenders (mortgagees in possession) have a legal responsibility to get the best price for the property that can reasonably be obtained. If you think your lender has failed to get a fair price, get advice from a solicitor. You may be entitled to compensation.

 

Stopping a sale due to a change in circumstances

 

It may be possible to stop the sale if you can raise the money to pay off your debts soon after the eviction. If you want to do this, you need to act quickly; and apply for an injunction to stop the sale of your home while the arrangements are made. If contracts are exchanged with a buyer before you do this, you can't stop the sale from going ahead.

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

BBC Inside Out -

 

 

interesting reading

 

jan

  • Haha 1

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting Jan,

 

As you say, we know it goes on, and is rife throughout the industry, but proving it is a different matter.

 

I'm sure that if there was an investigation into the dealings and lines of communication with these people, it wouldn't be long before the old boys club is identified in every area, if they haven't been already.

 

I am also certain that there are many 'victims' who are determined to hunt down these pillagers, with the internet providing information and communication which until recently has been unavailable.

 

The clock is ticking.

 

Thanks to those who PM'd me, all information in strict confidence and much appreciated.

 

Keep 'em coming and happy hunting.

 

Tide

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi just wondered how things are going.

 

Hope you had a bit of a rest over christmas

 

Jan:)

  • Haha 1

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jan,

 

Having a good old rest, as this won't be resolved until the New Year. Hope you are too, and here's wishing yourself and all the other members of this site every success for 2008.

 

With a bit of luck, it should start with a bang!!

 

All the very best Jan, I'll post when I'm in a position to, hopefully early 2008.

 

Happy New Year

 

Tide

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

With a bit of luck, it should start with a bang!!

 

 

Happy New Year

 

Tide

 

Tide, you have the power of a horse, you don't need luck anymore when the resources we have all found within ourselves are here at the click of a mouse.

 

I, for one, admire what you have done to date, through the adversity you have gone through you have inspired and helped so many others too without thought for yourself. Your 2008 will be memorable as I know will numerous others on CAG who have battled thus far.

 

To you Tide, I wish you the happiest of years ahead and to others who are just beginning take this man as an example. Empower yourselves, realise there is a way through the darkness and that you will never be alone again no matter what you are experiencing, just like so many of us have and look to the future with bright eyes. A happy new year to you all, and Tide - Thank you for being an inspiration.

 

 

Sarah ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tide, you have the power of a horse, you don't need luck anymore when the resources we have all found within ourselves are here at the click of a mouse.

 

I, for one, admire what you have done to date, through the adversity you have gone through you have inspired and helped so many others too without thought for yourself. Your 2008 will be memorable as I know will numerous others on CAG who have battled thus far.

 

To you Tide, I wish you the happiest of years ahead and to others who are just beginning take this man as an example. Empower yourselves, realise there is a way through the darkness and that you will never be alone again no matter what you are experiencing, just like so many of us have and look to the future with bright eyes. A happy new year to you all, and Tide - Thank you for being an inspiration.

 

 

Sarah ;)

 

Here Here, I could not agree more..... Happy New Year and a healthy and prosperous one and I look forward to hearing all your news next year.

 

Dsxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

Has anybody heard of any change of name for the Council of Mortgage Lenders to the Committee of Mortgage Lenders?

 

Why the sudden change of name?

 

Were the Council of Mortgage Lenders a Limited Company? What status (partnership etc) do they hold now? If so, have peoples records been transferred from one to the other to avoid any litigation?

 

Hmmmmmm...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Els,

 

This is listed on the recent online credit checks with Experian and Equifax. The standard check was done against Council of Mortgage Lenders, but my online check tonight is against the Committee of Mortgage Lenders.

 

Are they moving the goalposts? Let's not forget that the original database was developed by the FOS who dropped it like a hot potato after they realised the implications of the DPA 1984/98. However, they didn't destroy the data they had amassed, they passed it illegally to a private firm who made a very profitable business out of its provision to anybody who would pay for it.

 

There are many mortgages in existence which do not provide a term or clause whereas the mortgagor has a right to provide the CML with your personal data, and now would be an ideal time to switch identity from Council of Mortgage Lenders to Committee of Mortgage Lenders. And, by the very fact they can't be googled shows this to be a stealth move.

 

Same old story, fold a company, open something untouchable. Out of the ashes a Phoenix?

 

Tide

 

Hunting...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Tide, but I am puzzled!

 

This is listed on the recent online credit checks with Experian and Equifax. The standard check was done against Council of Mortgage Lenders, but my online check tonight is against the Committee of Mortgage Lenders.

 

Do you mean you are running credit checks on the CML? :confused:

 

Let's not forget that the original database was developed by the FOS who dropped it like a hot potato after they realised the implications of the Data Protection Act 1984/98.

 

Which database do you mean?

 

Els

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would also like to know the name of the private company that were given these details if you know them Tide? PM me if you prefer..I'm following a few trails just now.

 

I searched Companies House and my own credit checking system for companies and found nothing on the Committee

 

Cheers

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Tide, but I am puzzled! Do you mean you are running credit checks on the CML? :confused: Which database do you mean?

Els

 

No Els,

 

I ran a credit check on myself a couple of days ago with checkmyfile.co.uk , and got the security key through today. This enables you to check your credit score, and details of any CCJ's against you, Fraud, Searches against you, CML, Electoral Register etc.

 

When you click the mortgages tab, it says the information is provided by the Committee of Mortgage Lenders.

 

I'm also confused, and a bit concerned.

 

I have made an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to the Council of Mortgage Lenders in the past and received nothing, and they don't appear to have any watchdog or ombudsman except the Information Commissioners Office??

 

Tide

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would also like to know the name of the private company that were given these details if you know them Tide? PM me if you prefer..I'm following a few trails just now.

 

I searched Companies House and my own credit checking system for companies and found nothing on the Committee

 

Cheers

 

Sarah

 

Hi Sarah,

 

Searched Companies House myself earlier and found nothing, but more concerned that they can't be googled or yelled etc.

 

OK. A pint for whoever finds the first info..

 

I guess they are a Limited Partnership.

 

Tide

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...