Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bailiff notice of distress listing a car not owned by debtor.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4488 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Hopefully someone can help. My girlfriend has some out standing debt in form of council tax which has been passed over to Rossendales. Today a bailiff has visited whilst no one was home.

 

A notice of distress had been posted though the door thats lists a car owned by myself in the inventory. What does this mean? can they take the car? what is the best way to go about proving the car doesn't belong to her.

 

She hasn't signed anything so can they take the car or enter our house without our permission.

 

I believe we can pay back the council direct, is it best to contact them to arrange a sum as we can't afford a lot but want to start paying it off.

 

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you live at the address with her? as the bailiff will assume joint ownership, are you working or on benefits, this will affect the advice that may be given. Your GF needs to contact the council ASAP to establish what she actually owes, as it will differ possibly considerably from the bailiffs figures,. so first thing tomorrow, she must phone the council back it up with an email asking

How many Liability orders the hold on her

How much are they for

When were they obtained

when were they passed to bailiffs for action.

 

once she knows that, you can post back the figures and Caggers can advise further. If you have proof of ownership, you may be able to convince the bailiff company, that their levy is invalid, but if you are cohabiting that is difficult, as they assume joint liability.

 

Don't worry all is not lost and Caggers are here to help. In facy I'm sure others who know more will be along presently

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for some fast replies, the council tax bill is an old one from a previous address before we were together its with Manchester Council, we live in Nottinghamshire, our main concern at the moment is that bailiff now can enter our house forcefully. We both work although she is on maternity leave so is on reduced pay hence we can't afford much.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bailiffs can't enter you house without having first been in. They can enter through an unlock door or window, but cannot break in. If they come while you are at home, don't let them in under any circumstances, not to talk about an arrangement, needs to go for a pee, whatever.

 

I'm sure plodder tom with pick this up tomorrow, he will put you right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As it is for a previous address and also before you got together they can only seize the goods of the debtor - the Bailiff will no doubt argue otherwise. You also state your OH is on maternity leave - how long since the baby was born as there is a very strong possibility that both she and therefore the household could be classed as vulnerable.? He cannot even begin to enter your home by force as he has not gained previous peaceful entry - again he will tell you he can.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dave i'm currently in a dispute with a bailiff who has levyed on someone elses property, I know it's stressful but try to remember that they are employing tactics that prey on fear and vunerability, and often have little or no real authority, this last point is key. Have they tried to charge you for attending to remove goods at the same time? If they have then it's very irregular and this is in you favour.

 

I would start to make payments to the council they will always accept payments, and complain to them about whats happened, they might not respond to verbal complaints then put it in writing that the bailiff is trying to levy on others property. This way they might take back the debt obviously the more that you can afford to pay of the original CT bill the better as it completely takes the wind out of bailiffs sails. Also don't make any payment to the bailiff all payments are to go directly to the council it's up to them if they pass it on to the bailiffs but it's highly unlikely that this will happen. If you pay the bailiff then they will cover their 'fees' (usually just fabrications) first and pass on the rest to the council.

 

 

I copied this from a cagger post which sets out quite neatly some important points (thanks to fairplay77):-

 

remember the following:

 

1. Bailiffs cannot enter your home unless you give them permission or unless they find an open door or window. However, once they have entered, they have the 'right' to enter your home again even without your permission. So DON'T LET THEM IN IN THE FIRST PLACE!

 

2. If the council agree to take back the debt that is fine, but even if they don't you can still opt to pay the council instead of the bailiffs (but do not pay by direct debit because the amount taken can be changed without your permission).

 

3. Don't believe anything the bailiffs tell you, especially silly illegal threats about having you committed to prison. There's no way they can do that. In fact they have very little power - they are paper tigers!

 

4. It's very unlikely they will steal your neighbour's car, uness, that is, the bailiff doesn't mind doing a spot of porridge!

 

5.Check the charges they are trying to slap on. They can only charge £24.50 for a first visit and £18 for a second as long as you haven't signed anything, i.e. what is called a Walking Possession Order.

 

 

[/color]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...