Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep let us have a good laugh eh from today’s Telegraph 🤣😂🤣 the rest must try harder    Farage won Friday’s election debate, a poll finds Nigel Farage won Friday night’s seven-way BBC election debate, according to a poll.  A snap poll of 1,031 voters by More in Common found most thought Mr Farage won the debate, followed by Angela Rayner. Mr Farage received 25 per cent of the vote while Ms Rayner received 19 per cent. The Green Party’s Carla Denyer was the third most popular with 11 per cent, Stephen Flynn for SNP received 10 per cent and Penny Mordaunt, the leader of the House of Commons, took 7 per cent of the vote. Daisy Cooper, the deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats and Plaid Cymru’s Rhun ap Iorwerth took 5 per cent and 2  per cent respectively. The debate saw Britain’s main seven political parties clash ahead of the general election on July 4.  Mr Farage, who returned to frontline politics for Reform this week and is standing as an MP in Clacton, challenged his political rivals on immigration and net zero policies.
    • Hi CAG Team, I'm seeking your skills and help for a NtK my partner received through the post earlier this week. To give a little backstory, my partner and I, along with our young children (4 and 7), decided to go on a camping holiday about 3 hours away from us. We took a car each because we didn't have enough room in one car. We arrived at the services at very similar times as we followed each other the whole way. So, two cars. My partner has received this NtK, but I haven't. This NtK dropped through the front door on Wednesday, June 5, 2024.  We both parked in the Burger King car park, not in BP; we got out, all went for a toilet break, got some food from the BP garage and returned to our cars to eat.  After eating, we took the kids to the toilet again before leaving to complete our journey. I didn't notice any parking restriction signs and can't get back to the location due to how far away it is. I noticed another person had an issue here and reported it to you, and they managed to get the fine dropped. See below. To me, it looks like they have cameras at the complex's entrance and exit. I'm not sure if they own the land/car park by Burger King, so I'm not sure if this is a legal contract or not.  I find that 30 mins limit at a Services that serves hot food to be ridiculous and unfair, especially as we had kids to feed and water.  And the fact that I didn't receive the same NtK despite us driving in and out together is just crazy. This is the location - I also uploaded a map image. Google Maps MAPS.APP.GOO.GL ★★★☆☆ · Restaurant   1 Date of the infringement 24th May 2024   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 29th May 2024   3 Date received 5th June 2024   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] N   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Y - Only entering and exiting the complex/land.   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] N   7 Who is the parking company? MET   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] BP Blue Boys, Tonbridge TN12 7HE   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. POPLA Anyway, I hope you can help me out with some guidance on how to proceed with this. Let me know if you need anything else. Thank you, Passerby0233 2024-06-08 13_17_52-Burger King - Google Maps — Mozilla Firefox.pdf NtK_29-05-2024.compressed.pdf
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre (Northampton) Name of the Claimant ? PRA Group (UK) Limited How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self Date of issue – 23/5/24 AOS - Tues, 11/6/24 (19 days)  Defence - Thurs, 25/6/24 (33 days) Particulars of Claim 1. The Claimant claims the sum of £7926 for an outstanding debt owed. 2. On 20/4/18 the Defendant entered into an agreement with Lloyds Bank for a Credit Card under reference [16 numbers]. 3. On 10/5/22 the Defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £7296. 4. On 28/11/23 the debt of £7296 was assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group UK Portfolios Ltd on 30/12/23. Notices of assignment were sent to the Defendant in accordance with S136 Law of Property Act 1925. The Claimant has instructed PRA Group (UK) to act on its behalf and the CLAIMANT CLAIMS 1. The sum of £7925 What is the total value of the claim? £8481 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Yes Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? I believe I sent a letter by registered mail of a change in address to abroad in 2021. Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit card When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not personally - probably sent to my parents Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not personally - probably sent to my parents Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Not personally - probably sent to my parents Why did you cease payments? Unable to afford, living abroad What was the date of your last payment? Unsure (probably 2021) Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No ................... I have read through a number of similar threads, one thing i'm not sure how to proceed about is that I live abroad in the middle east and have done for several years. The claim letter was sent to my parents address and I really don't want them to be harassed about this. I am sure I sent the original creditor a registered letter with my change of address but can't find this currently. I am not in a position to pay this, and tend to come back to the UK to see family at most once a year (less since Covid),  not particular bothered about my financial score...more concerned about harassment of my parents. I have not registered on the gov gateway or anything like that.  Details below (as best as i can), and thank you for taking the time to look into it. Also redacted claim form attached: Claim form 23-5-24.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Changes at HFO / Turnbull Rutherford – Quarterdeck Law Ltd


DonkeyB
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4226 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 306
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I had a letter in the post two days ago from Roxburghe, the account is still in dispute with HFO Services.

 

Can you report this to OFT - think that you may have already made a complaint to them. Also update your own thread if you like.

 

Thanks for the info!

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning all,

 

reading this thread, confused and annoyed that a company that is barely in existence can still take me to court tomorrow and have my money held by court.

Anyway to update on turnbull/rutherfords location , I have cut and pasted from the email they sent 5 days ago to my email address kindest in frustration Soaringheights :roll:

 

We ask that you note our change of address, which can be found below.

 

Kindest regards

 

James Bolton

 

Trainee Solicitor

Turnbull Rutherford Solicitors Direct Line: 0208 899 6010

Fax: 0208 849 5719

Email: [email protected]: www.turnbullrutherford.com This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information.In the event of any technical difficulty with this e-mail, please contact the sender or [email protected] Turnbull Rutherford SolicitorsBuilding 3, Chiswick Park566 Chiswick High RoadLondonW4 5YA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get to the court early and give the Court Clerk the details of the change of company and the trainee solicitors details and ask for them to be put in front of the judge. The judge may strike the case out but you never know. Wonder who will represent this company in court and will they have the full 'facts'?

 

Don't forget to let us know of the result and the name of the person representing HFO/Roxburghe. I am almost certain they cannot use Rox to bring HFO cases to court as Rox was not the original assignee, and their assignee notices only state HFO Services and not Rox... plus the fact that Rox has been dormant for ages. Something rather fishy here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Silly girl,

thanks for reply- gosh you are up early on a sun.

 

I wish I could get to the court, but I am working offshore. ( which they know I do)

I can phone first thing.

 

The email I got informing me of court date was from T/R - James Bolton on behalf of HFO below is the email.

 

HFO Services v

Inboxx

James BoltonFeb 1 (4 days ago)

Our client: HFO Services Ltd Claim No: 6 Dear , Please find...

 

James Bolton [email protected]

Feb 1 (4 days ago)

to me, Laurence

 

Our client: HFO Services Ltd

Claim No:

Dear,

 

Please find attached a scanned copy of the hearing notice listing our client's application for a third party debt order ......................... , Guildford County Court.

 

We ask that you note our change of address, which can be found below.

 

Kindest regards

 

James Bolton

 

Trainee Solicitor

Turnbull Rutherford Solicitors Direct Line: 0208 899 6010

Fax: 0208 849 5719

Email: [email protected]: www.turnbullrutherford.com This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information.In the event of any technical difficulty with this e-mail, please contact the sender or [email protected] Turnbull Rutherford SolicitorsBuilding 3, Chiswick Park566 Chiswick High RoadLondonW4 5YA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a separate thread on this issue, third party debt orders are very dubious ways of getting hold of your funds and I hope you have filed a strong defence against it.

 

I would also apply for a set aside of the original judgement so it can be re-examined in light of the TR issue and the varying HFO companies not having title to the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I received letters from Roxburghe saying that they have been instructed by their client HFO and are now dealing with "my" account.

They are making an offer because they are "unlike other Debt Collection Agencies would like to assist ...in bringing this matter to a conclusion".

 

Jenny - I think that you need to start your own new thread about this and give us the details of this debt and what has been happening in the past. That way we can advise you properly on how to deal with it. This thread will get very confusing if we start covering different cases

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Interesting. It appears that this company had a lot of employees. They clearly did not work for HFO Services (as Michelle Kuhler signed herself on witness statements – owed over £3,000) or Turnbull Rutherford (Diana Nelson, whose Linked In profile clearly states Turnbull Rutherford as employer – http://www.linkedin.com/pub/diana-nelson-micm/1b/41a/770 – owed over £7,000).

 

Someone is being economical with the actualité. Some questions need to be asked here.

 

There’s also an inter-company loan from HFO Capital Ltd (Ireland) of nigh on £375,000.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here’s the Companies House PDFs regarding the company’s trading situation. The interesting one with all the figures is the Statement of Affairs.

 

I repeat that this document is in the public domain as a matter of public record.

 

Please be very careful with any comments if you’re not used to looking at documents like this.

Notice of Liquidators.pdf

Statement of Affairs.pdf

Special Resolution.pdf

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well said DB,yes everyone please take great care

if making any comment, I'm sure the ''Fan Club,''

and others asscociated with will know how to respod

if needed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...