Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Do you have broadband at home? A permanent move to e.g. Sky Glass may not fit with your desire to keep your digibox,, but can you move the items you most want off the digibox? If so, Sky Glass might suit you. You might ask Sky to loan you a “puck” and provide access as an interim measure. another option might be using Sky Go, at least short term, to give you access to some of the Sky programming while awaiting the dish being sorted.
    • £85PCM to sky, what!! why are you paying so much, what did you watch on sky thats not on freeview?  
    • Between yourself and Dave you have produced a very good WS. However if you were to do a harder hitting WS it may be that VCS would be more likely to cancel prior to a hearing. The Contract . VCS [Jake Burgess?] are trying to conflate parking in a car park to driving along a road in order to defend the indefensible. It is well known that "NO Stopping " cannot form a contract as it is prohibitory. VCS know that well as they lose time and again in Court when claiming it is contractual. By mixing up parking with driving they hope to deflect from the fact trying to claim that No Stopping is contractual is tantamount to perjury. No wonder mr Burgess doesn't want to appear in Court. Conflation also disguises the fact that while parking in a car park for a period of time can be interpreted as the acceptance of the contract that is not the case while driving down a road. The Defendant was going to the airport so it is ludicrous to suggest that driving by a No Stopping  sign is tacitly accepting  the  contract -especially as no contract is even being offered. And even if a motorist did not wish to be bound by the so called contract what could they do? Forfeit their flight and still have to stop their car to turn around? Put like that the whole scenario posed by Mr Burgess that the Defendant accepted the contract by driving past the sign is absolutely absurd and indefensible. I certainly would not want to appear in Court defending that statement either. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I will do the contract itself later.
    • Yes - ignore. Because of another MET victim today I looked at all our MET cases back to June 2014 ... yes, 10 years. They have never dared take a motorist to court and argue their case before a judge.  They have started the odd court case, but as a means of trying to intimidate the motorist into coughing up, when the motorist defended and refused to give in it was MET who bottled it and discontinued.
    • Unpaid wages should be pretty straightforward if you did the work. Don't be intimidated. You need only show you were due money, and did not get money.   The risk is that they have no money to pay you (and legal fees) - frankly a solicitor maybe be costing them more than your claim is for and I might have expected them to make a commercial decision to settle before this point regardless of the merits of the case.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lloyds claimform - old tsb debt - Lost Case - agreed variation order - but DCa's keep still chasing to up agreed payments


Dorabell
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1115 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 554
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I could call them worse than that:)

Hi

HH can i ask your advice please:)

i have an hearing next week:

i have to send my objections this week

is there any forms i have to fill in or do i just put in writing,

do i have to put copies of proof of payments and a copy of the court order as well

or do i have to take them just on the day,

also will my OH have to send objections will it make any different

your advice is most appreciated thank you:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dora,

This is your OH's objection letter - short and sweet I know but I was told to keep it that way.

Send it to the court and ask him/her to sign it at the bottom.

I would be grateful if this letter could be placed before the Judge at the hearing on

I object to a charging order being placed in that I have a beneficial interest in that I jointly own this property.

When the house was purchased I solely paid the deposit and I am maintaining the mortgage payments. In the present economic climate and due to the fact there are a number of secured creditors we at the present time have negative equity.

At the same time but not in the same envelope, send a statement.

This was my objection statement. You must edit to suit (some bits you will need to take out) but bears similarities to your own. Hope it helps.

I, Hammyhound of hereby make this statement from my own knowledge and belief detailing the chronology of events and why I believe a charging order should not be placed on our property.

 1. On District Judge made an order that Judgment be entered and that at the same time the case be listed on to consider instalment payments, a copy of which I enclose marked “A”

 2. On District Judge ordered that I pay instalment payments at the rate of £ per month.

 3. I received a letter from the Claimant’s solicitors enclosing an Interim Charging Order together with their application for a charging order. District Judge made that order on . I can only assume that District Judge was unaware of any instalment order in place when making that charging order as case law states that

 Section 86(1) The County Courts Act 1984:

 ' Where the court has made an order for payment of any sum of money by instalments, execution on the order shall not be issued until after default in payment of some instalment according to the order '

 This was further considered in the case of Mercantile Credit v Ellis in The Court of Appeal 1987. It was found that the wording of the Charging Orders Act states quite clearly that no further action could be taken without a default in payment.

 4. Before the charging order application was heard on the Claimant’s representative handed to me case law which he said “this case law takes precedence over Mercantile Credit v Ellis. I was unaware of this case law Ropaigealach v Allied Irish Bank and asked District Judge for an adjournment so I could take advice.

 5. I am advised that this case bears no relevance to my own as my instalment order was made before District Judge considered the Claimant’s application.

 6. I respectfully request that the Judge considers this statement and dismisses the Claimant’s application as an instalment order was already in place before the Claimant’s application for a charging order and that I have not defaulted on any payment.

 8. I believe the contents of this statement are true.

 Dora, don't forget the heading at the top.

 You can put in a copy of your statements as an exhibit say at 3.

 I exhibit hereto copy bank statements showing that all instalment payments as per the Order dated have been made and that they are all up to date.

 Send them separately or even better take them to the court and get a receipt.

 Any questions come back.

 

HH x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi HH thanks for the above

this went to court last week

unfortunately i could not make it through illness:

 i have received a letter from the court today:-

it is ordered that the application for charging order is struck out and the charge created by the interim charging order is discharged

thanks once again for your help:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Horray, another one in the eye for SCM and they can't even claim their costs for it, even better.:D

 

Even though you didnt attend their claim for a CO was struck out - I love it.

 

Dora, I only helped a little at the end, I have followed your post from the beginning and it is all the other Caggers who helped you through this that need the thanks.

 

Ring up the Land Registry in a few weeks and ask if the restriction has been removed, if not send a letter to SCM with a copy of the court order asking them to remove it. Make sure once you get the Office Copies from the Land Registry that it is in exactly the same form before SCM made their application.

 

Never miss a payment - not even by a couple of days because as you know SCM will try anything.

 

I am so pleased for you.

 

Hopefully the site team will change it to a "Won".

 

HH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks HH :) and yes i do thank all the Caggers that have helped me:) with out there great help i would not have got through this:) and also a big thank you to Andy who i have been badgering aswell:lol: so once again all a big thank you:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dorabell

 

Have read your thread today & realised I am in a similar situation to you now. Having read what Andy said at #412 just makes me wonder now myself if I should accept my miscarriage of justice done to me aswell with my judgement I was served this week for a hearing next week.

 

Your information posted is giving me food for thought & wanted to say how admired I am on being so accepting of it, you are truly remarkable. I wish you well MDAW x

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much :)

as i said with out the help off Andy:) and the other Caggers:)

i would have not come this far it has not been easy as you now a lot off worry and stress but dont let the buggers get you down fight all the way because you can only pay what you can afford:) good luck :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Dora I trust you and yours are keeping well

 

Are you all sorted out on this now?

 

Regards

 

Andy;)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

hi

all i need another bit off advice please again:???:

I have just checked my credit report,

i have found the account that i had with lloyds who took this to court and won ccj in 2009:{did defend but lost}

this account has not been updated since 2008:???:

they have started to update it now:???:

it does not say ccj,

just says it was defaulted balance, current balance, and the date it was defaulted on 2008, and file updated for the period xx xx 2011

i would have thought they would put a ccj on the account:???:

i hope i have,nt confused you all lol:-)

advice would be appreciated thanks:-)

 

Bump:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any CCJ will be shown in the Public Information

Section of your CRA report, if you are sure that

a judgement was made and it is not on the files

check with Trustonline(there is a charge).

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brigadier thanks for your reply:-) its not showing up on my public information part, i have checked with trustonline guess what its not registered on there

either:???: im baffeled its to whats happening to all that money i have been paying monthly since november 2009:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Silly question are you sure a CCJ was granted, it would most certainly

be on Trustonline.

Is any one chasing you for this??

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think now the only approach is

a SAR to LloydsTSB , strange Carters

letter makes no mention of a CCJ.

Use the template letter from the CAG

library and amend it to suit, there is a

statutory fee of £10 and they have 40 days

to supply all the information they hold.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi sent for all the information on the above no joy yet still got a week or so thou still up are dating information on my file does,nt correspond with what i have paid to date

very confused:???: lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't say I'm surprised at that Dora, there are many odd variations on debts on each

CRA file, so the info should give us some clear (I hope) as to what the real situation is.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is actually getting out of hand the number of variations on individuals

credit reports is I think going to cause some very severe headaches.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...