Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CRS Credit Recovery Services chasing


Hallahn
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4504 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yesterday, I receive a letter from CRS (It was a slightly soggy letter, what with all the rain lately.) informing me that an amount of £463.65 has been passed from Springslite gym to CRS. I admit fault on that part, I lost my job, and not long after my house (rented, also had my partner leave, so suddenly the rent and bills were a bit too much. Got to laugh at it all.) and paying my gym membership got relegated to the bottom of the list. Anyway, I have no issues admitting that debt, but do take issue with the £202.91 charge they've added to it! That's nigh on a 44% increase, seemingly because they want to! I've already spoken to them via the phone (May have been a mistake?) saying I'm willing to offer £40 a month, the most I can afford, and yes, okay, you'll be taking a percentage of that as your cut, and yes, alright, there's a one off fee. Fine, take all that. I did state that I would not pay their added charge however, and it was on this basis that they refused, along with stating that they can't contact me any other way aside from mail (I asked if they can use email, as I'm back with my family for the time being and don't want to get them involved in this, they've got enough on their plate), nor could they even use telephone!

 

Is there any advice anyone can offer for this situation? I've made my offer to them via the phone, and I'd rather not drag this out any more than I have to and chance letting anyone else in the household know (As I said, they've all got enough going on.) Thank you in advance!

 

Also, while I'm thinking on it, I'll copy the letter they sent me here, too! Please try to keep in mind that I received this letter -yesterday- when noting the date on it!

 

-------------------------------------------------

 

29th December 2011

 

(Name, address etc here)

 

Dear Mr Campbell

 

IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ VERY CAREFULLY

 

Re: CRS Ref No: (Number here)

Springslite Ref. No: (Reference here)

 

An amount of £463.65 with Springslite has now been passed to us for collection.

 

In accordance with the terms and conditions of your contract with Springslite, you have now also become responsible for our fees in recovering this amount. Our standard charge of £ 202.91 has therefore been applied bringing the full account balance to £ 666.56.

 

You can now only speak to use about this balance. Springslite will simply refer you back to us if you contact them.

 

Please call us on 01444 449 165 to arrange payment of your balance over the telephone.

 

If you are unable to settle the balance straight away, please still call us as we will help you resolve any problems you have in paying.

 

A collector will be used to recover your balance if you do not call us by 5 January 2012, which may lead to you being taken to Court.

 

We want to help you clear this balance but failure to address the matter may result in further fees being applied, so please call today.

 

Yours sincerely

For Credit Resolution Services

 

(Signature)

 

Charlotte Edwards

Collections Department

 

-------------------------------------------------

 

I've tried to keep the format of the letter intact, and the typos (Spaces between pound and amount) intact. I don't mind admitting, I'm feeling more than a little worried here : /

Edited by Hallahn
Removed the Springlite ref. number, and edited the title.
Link to post
Share on other sites

What a childish letter!

 

Er, IMO only pay the GYM, not these clowns, and as for their charges, they can forget those, where did they think up the figure of £202.91??

 

Keep everything in writing, stay off the phone, this is not a priority debt, and I very strongly doubt these fools will go anywhere near a court!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forward their letter to the OFT.

d. 'threatening' to refer the debt to a third party debt collection business, with potential cost implications for the debtor, under circumstances in which the evidence suggests that, in reality, the creditor has, or can be reasonably concluded as having, no current intention of doing so.

 

Charging for debt recovery

3.10 Charges should not be levied inappropriately or unfairly.

 

a. misleading debtors into believing they are legally liable to pay recovery charges when this is not the case

 

b. claiming recovery costs from a debtor in the absence of express contractual provision to be able to do so

 

c. not giving a clear indication in credit agreements of the amount of any charges payable on default

 

d. applying unreasonable charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hallahn - you've posted this in the right place this time !! :wink:

 

First off, do not speak to CRS or anyone else about this by phone. Keep everything in writing only. If they call you, tell them to put anything they have to say in writing, and hang up.

 

Just to see if they have a right to collect anything in respect of your gym membership, please confirm how long your initial membership period was.

 

If it was 12 months or less, then you probably owe them for unpaid fees.

 

However, they have no right in law to make any penalty charges, admin charges, late payment fees, etc.

 

Therefore, all you will have to pay CRS is the amount of outstanding gym m/ship fees that you failed to pay.

 

Once you've told us about the initial contract length, I will probably suggest you write to CRS saying :-

 

Dear sir or madam,

 

Do not attempt to discuss this matter with me by phone. I require all communication to be in writing only.

 

I have taken advice in this matter and now understand you have no contractual right in law to make any admin or penalty charges in respect of my gym membership.

 

I acknowledge that I owe £xxx.xx in membership fees but I will pay you nothing more than this amount.

 

I require your written confirmation that you will accept the amount of £xxx.xx in full and final settlement of all monies owed by me to Springslite gym.

 

Until this is resolved, you must consider the matter to be in clear dispute and you should not make any further demands, nor should you pass the matter on to any "solicitor" for collection purposes. If you do, reports about your conduct will be made to the OFT and to Trading Standards without further warning.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

But don't send anything off until we've clarified the contract length position please.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should have also said that CRS will argue the hind legs off a donkey, saying all sorts about why you DO owe their stupid admin fees.

 

They will threaten to take court action, to pass the matter on to solicitors, etc, etc. But they will NOT take court action as they have no legal basis to do so !!

 

Once they agree to accept the amount you are prepared to pay, you can then decide if you can settle it in one go, or in instalments.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

theads and links tidied

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again! Thank you very much for the responses and assistance, all of you. Alas, sadly, it was a 2 year contract (We both took one out at the same-ish time - it worked out as a better deal, and getting healthy seemed like such a good idea!) so I've honestly no idea where that stands me. Should I go ahead with that letter, now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, if the initial or minimum contract period was for 2 years, it is considered to be be unfair to the consumer. See the case of the OFT -v- AMSL in the High Court last year. The contract is not enforceable and you pretty much owe the gym nothing.

 

Read more about this here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?320766-Ashbourne-Management-Services-Ltd-Contracts-longer-than-12-months

 

If you read other threads here, you should find letters which you can adapt to tell CRS. If I come across one, I'll come back here and give you a link to it.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Edit: I've spoken with my ex, who has also been contacted by a DCA and has begun paying them back. Turns out we took out 36 month contracts, not 24! Ho hum.

 

That... is... marvelous news, Slick, thank you!

Edited by Hallahn
Link to post
Share on other sites

36 months !! You won't have to pay them a penny more. The Judges rulings in the AMSL case will apply for sure. Get reading and follow the links through to the OFT site.

 

Also read the ruling itself - http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2011/1237.html

 

Tell your ex she can stop paying immediately. If she wants help, she can start her own thread or you can tell her the same advice that we give to you. Even though she started, or resumed, paying them, she has done so in error and can stop.

 

CRS will whinge like babies but, with a 36 month contract, the haven't a legal leg to stand on.

 

:wink:

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any letters that you find and want to use should always be adapted to reflect your own case.

 

See here. Take the time to read this all the way through - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?291124-Ashbourne-management&p=3453336&viewfull=1#post3453336

 

Another post here that applies - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?325854-Ashbourne-24-Month-Contract&p=3607025&viewfull=1#post3607025

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...