Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help needed with Resolvecall doorsteppers and SLC 'debt'


nonymouse
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4568 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please could someone offer some advice urgently?

 

Two weeks ago I came home to find a card from Resolvecall saying they had visited my home while I was out and asking me to contact them.

I immediately sent the letter from on here about doorstep visits by recorded delivery, and it was signed for the next day.

I have now had the following response from Resolvecall, dated 28th November and received yesterday 3rd December:

 

Dear xxxx

 

I write in response to your recent correspondence.

The case you have referred to is not applicable in your circumstances.

As part of the credit agreement that you signed and entered into,

you agreed to repay the full outstanding balance and that where necessary,

the creditor could recover the debt by outsourcing the debt to a third party,

which included by way of doorstep collection.

 

Therefore the licence you state that has been revoked is irrelevant,

which for the avoidance of doubt we do not agree to,

is not binding on us as it does not fulfill the principles of contract law.

 

We are entitled by law and under contract to recover monies outstanding

and we are allowed to take reasonable steps in accordance with regulatory guidance to recover such monies.

 

Yours sincerely

 

XXXX, Special Services Administration Manager

 

The creditor is apparently SLC for a student loan from 1996.

 

I am now terrified that Resolvecall will keep on trying to come round.

I know they have no powers and if they were to come when I answered the door

I'd happily tell them to 'go away' and slam the door,

but I'm rarely in during the day and the people I live with are not aware I am in debt

and would naturally start asking questions if they answered the door to someone asking for me who is,

to all intents and purposes pretending to be a bailiff.

 

Any ideas of what I do next, please??

Link to post
Share on other sites

no believe what they say

 

total borrocks!

 

you really should have ignored them and not responded

 

as for the loan

if its 1996 and you not acked it in 6yrs

 

then its statute barred

they are probably trying to diddle you

anyway on a debt you do not owe.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi nony

 

As DX says it's total rubbish. If they do come around and your not there, under the OFT Guidelines and Data Protection laws they can't discuss the matter with anyone but you. If they do you can take action.

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/OFT664Rev.pdf

http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_the_public.aspx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask them what law they are referring to?

There is only one Law and that is common law, no harm loss or fraud. Puerile fools, I'd be sending a copy of that letter to the OFT&TS and firmly placing it in the ignore pile!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all - although I'm still convinced they are going to turn up at my home which is scary I am relieved to hear you all say they are in the wrong. DX100UK - I do regret sending them the doorstep letter now but I felt I had to as they had visited my home once already when they left the card, and the general advice on here to anyone who's being threatened with a doostep visit is to sent the doorstep letter, hence I did. I'll be contacting the OFT and Trading Standards today. Do I contact my local branch of TS or should I contact the branch in Glasgow where Reslovecall are based, or both??

Link to post
Share on other sites

would not hurt to do you local one

they will prob know who has the file running on resolvescawl

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure they visited, they sometimes get the postman to deliver.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I'm certain they visited because the card was delivered in an envelope with only my name written on it, i.e. someone had turned up and pushed it through the letterbox. No address, so cannot have come by post.

 

I have reported them to both my local branch and their local branch of TS today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

good time to ignore

 

it was not served properly anyhow

so stuff 'em

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've just arrived home and there is another card in an envelope with my name on - obviously hand-delivered - stating this is the 2nd!!! (sic) time they have called. Clearly they have ignored my letter as above. What on earth do I do now? I CANNOT carry on ignoring these people as advised above if they are going to keep calling at my house and leaving cards which anyone in the household could see, but clearly they are going to disregard the doorstep letter if I send it again. Help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats the nature of the game they play sadly

 

they can do nowt to you

sadly you've just got to ride it out or complain to the oft and ts

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Complain to Trading Standards and the OFT, let the OFT know they have had more than 14 days to call their caller off and you are now formally complaining.

 

http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk for the OFT

http://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk for Trading Standards

 

They are out of order and need to be told off. Your complaint could be vitally important at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been reading your thread and It`s disgusting ....On the doorstep letter did you put that you would have a Tort of Trespass taken out against them if they called again and that the police would be informed and if at any chance you were in when they called there could even be intervention by the police to remove them ?

 

Seems to me they haven`t the guts to call when your in anyway so they must know you are out !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spots1 the letter I sent was the standard one from here which I adapted slightly and yes, does mention the tort of trespass: I note from the card left through my door today that you have visited with the aim of speaking to me urgently about the above account number. Please be advised that I do not hold an account with you, and I have no wish to speak with anyone from your company or any company you claim to represent either in person or by telephone. Correspondence will be entered into IN WRITING ONLY. Furthermore, should it be your intention to arrange any further visits to my address, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can ONLY visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make such an appointment with you. There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v Sheppard & Short Ltd [1959] 2 QB 384. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and, if you do so, you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken. To be clear, ANY action by a representative of Resolvecall to approach my home, to ring the doorbell or knock the door, to attempt to gain access or sight into my home though windows, to loiter outside or near to my home or sit in a vehicle outside or near my home, or to attempt to speak to me or to those with whom I share my home in my home or in the street WILL RESULT IN POLICE BEING CALLED AND A REPORT OF HARASSMENT MADE AGAINST YOU. This letter is sent by Recorded Delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...