Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 2 foot of sea level rise   The Thwaites Glacier — dubbed the “Doomsday” glacier because of the grave impacts for global sea level rise if it melts — is breaking down “much faster” than expected, according to a peer-reviewed study published on Monday in the academic journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Using satellite imagery, scientists determined that widespread contact between the glacier and warm ocean water is speeding up the melting process. The climate crisis is interrupting natural processes across large parts of the continent, according to the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition. The glacier, roughly the size of the United Kingdom, could cause global sea levels to rise more than two feet if it melts completely, according to the study. “Thwaites is the most unstable place in the Antarctic and contains the equivalent of 60 centimeters of sea level rise,” study co-author Christine Dow said in a statement. “The worry is that we are underestimating the speed that the glacier is changing, which would be devastating for coastal communities around the world,” she continued. Read the full story here.       or here ... from the India civil service currents affairs exam Doomsday glacier Antarctica‘s Thwaites Glacier, roughly the size of Britain, is a fast-moving glacier in West Antarctica. Because of the risk it faces — and poses — Thwaites is often called the Doomsday Glacier. Because of its size (1.9 lakh square km), it contains enough water to raise the sea level by more than half a metre. Thwaites’s melting already contributes 4% to global sea level rise each year. Thwaites are important for Antarctica as it slows the ice behind it from freely flowing into the ocean. Credits: BBC Vigorous melting Salty and relatively warm ocean water is infiltrating beneath Thwaites Glacier, leading to significantly speedy melting. This process, termed as “vigorous melting“, is eroding its stability. However, its potential collapse could lead to a staggering 10-foot rise in sea levels, posing a dire threat to coastal communities worldwide. Previous studies discovered a deep connection to the east through which deep water flows from Pine Island Bay. That study also attributed the melting to the heat transport caused by channels bringing warm water towards the glacier from the north. With melting, glaciers become light and float off the land where they used to be situated. The resulting retreating grounding line exposes more of a glacier’s base to seawater, increasing the risk of melting. Since the late 1990s, the glacier has seen a 14km retreat of its “grounding line.” The grounding line is the point where the ice flowing off the land and along the seabed floats up to form a huge platform.   https://www.pmfias.com/current-affairs-for-upsc-civil-services-exam-may-28-2024/   or here Satellite data reveals Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier is melting faster than we thought | Space WWW.SPACE.COM Seawater rushing miles beneath the glacier makes the ice more vulnerable to melting.  
    • I have notified all parties and will start a new thread.
    • The messaging app's boss has taken to social media to deny Mr Musk's claim it "exports user data."View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DWP Interview Under Caution


sinkinghelp
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3769 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The magistrates probably thought, holy moly that dude wants to be crucified..

 

Only kidding , crown court is risky because one thing they can do is impose a greater sentence than magistrates. But then again issues where magistrates would be ok with, crown court wouldnt. Then there is the costs involved , magistrates is cheap.

 

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070706102737AAFPuVh

 

bad monkey answer is rough and ready approximation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 520
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello

 

Thanks for the reply

 

I opted for Crown Court it is a risk but I need the input of professional people and ordinary jurors to look openly at this case

 

The shock of today being told that it was a private prosecution brought by the Council and they were also including the DWP portion as well - especially nothing was stated on the summons

 

That did knock the wind out of my sails

 

I thought the DWP may have sent me a letter stating they intended to prosecute - but I never received one

 

regards

 

sinkinghelp

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been on 3 jury,s sinkinghelp,I would say its your best option because unless you have uncontravertable evidence magistrates just take the prosecuters word and convict,whereas a jury looks at the evidence or should do.I was also on your side of a jury some 20 odd years ago and they saw right through the prosecution,s case and I won 12-0.

Living in the wild windy west of Ireland

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello wobbly

 

Thanks for the reply

 

I am hoping that the crown court system will be better than the local hang em and flog em magistrates we have locally

 

I am also suprised the Crown Prosecution Service were not the prosecution today but a private solicitor on behalf of the council

 

thanks again

 

sinkinghelp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello folks

 

I have tried to gain some information from the DWP

 

I telephone my local jobcentre plus and also the Debt Management Centre at Mitcheldean

 

The staff were polite but both stated that with the limited information on the screen they had no information they could reveal as to why if I should or should not have been notified regarding the intended prosecution

 

I queried the fact that as I am in the Appeal stage of the decision yet they have pushed ahead for prosecution - again they could not answer

 

I also asked as to why the council were paying for a private prosecution and not using the CPS and the reply was the same

 

I expected as much but the staff were polite and suggested that it may be a case of writing in

 

I also challenged taking so much of my Incapacity Benefit and aagin I have to write in with an income and expenditure sheet so that I will get sorted

 

Anyone with any thoughts I would like to hear them

 

 

regards

 

sinkinghelp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who does what in the court

 

A Crown Court:

  • normally has a jury - which decides if you’re guilty or not
  • has a judge - who decides what sentence you get

from :

 

https://www.gov.uk/courts/crown-court

 

So not all cases in front of crown court have a jury, but i think fraud is one of the cases where there will be a jury, best check with you legal dude to be safe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Zonker

 

Thanks for your reply

 

Its the why did the council opt for a private prosecution as opossed to the CPS and why the DWP never told me anything about the prosecution

 

I just cant seem to find an answer at the moment

 

regards

 

sinkinghelp

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.cambridge.gov.uk/ccm/content/benefits-and-council-tax/housing-benefit/overpayments.en

 

'Housing Benefit overpayments are a civil debt for which we can sue in the county or high court.'

 

Quote taken from cambridge council website. Hence no CPS involvement.

 

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/local-authority-staff/housing-benefit/claims-processing/operational-manuals/overpayments-guide/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello zonker

 

Thanks for the reply all good stuff.

 

However the council issued a magistrates summons to be dealt with by way of a criminal prosecution

 

So I would have expected because the council have included the DWP interest a CPS prosecutor and not a local solicitor

 

thanks for the reply though

 

regards

 

sinkinghelp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sinking, Although I cant comment on why the DWP didn't summons you (because I dont know - not because I am hiding anything) it depends on who the lead organisation is.

The LA's that I am aware of have their own legal teams and solicitors who work for the council. They take the lead in magistrates in prosecuting cases. The DWP used to have their own but have recently merged with CPS.

 

When the DWP were the prosecuting authority they employed a local agent solicitor to prosecute on their behalf. Now that they are CPS, the DWP work is ringfenced and part of their duties is indeed to prosecute cases at Court. That does not mean that they are able to attend each Court and when they are not able to so they will still send a local agent solicitor to act on behalf of the CPS.

 

I wouldn't draw much inference from the appearance of a local solicitor as he could just be 'subcontracted' to work for the CPS or the LA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Many thanks for the reply and it makes sense to me which goes someway to answering my questions

 

As I am alleged to owe more to the DWP than the council I would have expected to receive documentation from DWP for prosecution but the summons was issued by the council and no where on it did it say DWP

 

I am still following the Appeal procedure with the council and DWP

 

My earlier posts regarding the telephone calls explain a bit more

 

It through my solicitor as well what happened in court

 

As time move towards the Crown Court next year I will hopefully get to grip on what is happening

 

thanks again for the reply

 

 

regards

 

sinkinghelp

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what i have understood so far, the council have been the driving force so far to get to court. Magistrates court would have been the court of choice for them. I think the council now have to go back and consider wether ther relatively small sum (you say about £2000, i think) justifies the expenses involved. I would imagine that there will now be a lot of talking by the council with the DWP to get them to take the lead from now and limit their costs. I realise that DWP are owed more, but you are paying that back already with most of your IB. Not sure if DWP wanted to go to court in the first place and not sure they would want to as they are getting money of you. I thought that would look bad in court.

 

I realise all this is alledged amounts , as you have said about this pension didnt matter according to the benfits agency at the time of applying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if DWP wanted to go to court in the first place and not sure they would want to as they are getting money of you. I thought that would look bad in court.

 

They certainly would wan it to go to court for 13k! Even if the full over payment had been paid back a year ago I expect. It doesn't look bad in court at all. If they didn't prosecute just because people paid it back, people would risk claiming fraudulantly all the time & look on it as an interest free loan?

I'm more surprised the LA wanted to prosecute if the amount is down to 500, but it's not unheard of.

 

So sorry to hear it's still going on over a year later now sinkinghelp. I think you could be right about going to crown court, I would probably want the same. It's a shame there is no record of phone calls. Although I wonder if sometimes there is, pretty sure my council knew exactly what I was talking about when I said a guy in their dept told me something over the phone. The woman interviewing me under caution asked if I remember his name, but I don't remember what time I am supposed to be places these days let along 2 years ago. And I would never have thought to ask him at the time anyway. And they didn't take any further action with me.

Your best bet in that case would be a jury, it will be a case of convincing them this DWP employer told you that.

They do make mistakes, a friend of mine was NOT told by someone at DWP he could only keep proceeds of the sale of his house for 6 months whilst looking for another & at the 11th hour they found proof that he had let them know about this money, he opted for crown court like you, & I forget all the details & haven't spoken to him for a while but I am pretty sure it got thrown out of court.

His housing benefit over payment was reduced from 11k to under 1k I think because of him pushing for months to get them to accept that he would have had to use some of that money to pay full rent etc & support him & a child, which would have put him under the threshold for savings within a month, which would have had him back on IS which would have passported him to full housing benefit.

Sorry that was all a bit long winded wasn't it!

Just should have said really, if you are not guilty, fight all the way. It's exausting though i'm sure. You're stronger than you ever thought though ey!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Zonker

 

Thanks for the reply

 

Absolutely correct with your reply. However in court the council prosecuter gave the council figure of just under £2,900 and the DWP amount of £14,000

 

However I do not owe the Council anything. After getting the Ombudsman involved there was some re calculation and that reduced and a friend paid the rest off so I owe them nothing

 

The DWP are indeed taking their repayments

 

I have been told that for the CPS to run there must be an 80% chance of conviction so this may be another reason the council paid for a private prosecution

 

thanks again

 

 

regards

 

sinkinghelp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello jadeybags

 

Again quite right in what you say. However posting on here has been a lifeline really. I have been so low because I was unsure of the way the systems work. Also the council have been evil. Because I refused to roll over from the beginning and bringing in the Ombudsman did not go down well at all. The council have been obstructive in everything they have done

 

The council will be begging the DWP to take the lead now I have no doubt as the cost for Crown Court will he huge looking at some court reports

 

What I have discovered along the way is that a conviction for fraud of any kind has a huge impact in other matters such as house and car insurance but that is to be researched later

 

I do take some strength from everyone who posts and I hope although this thread is long others have managed to gain some information

 

 

thanks

 

sinkinghelp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all

 

Just been looking through my Courts and Tribunal Service paperwork which is 10 days time.

 

My Appeal which I made in July against the council is just being heard cant get Legal Aid and the local welfare rights have no one available plus the CAB cant help either

 

This should be interesting especialy as its the council pushing for a criminal conviction as well. They will come represented by a the same solicitor who I met in the magistrates the other day I have no doubt

 

So its on my own for this one !

 

regards

 

sinkinghelp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all

 

Just been looking through my Courts and Tribunal Service paperwork which is 10 days time.

 

My Appeal which I made in July against the council is just being heard cant get Legal Aid and the local welfare rights have no one available plus the CAB cant help either

 

This should be interesting especialy as its the council pushing for a criminal conviction as well. They will come represented by a the same solicitor who I met in the magistrates the other day I have no doubt

 

So its on my own for this one !

 

regards

 

sinkinghelp

 

Make sure you have your case and arguments stated in writing.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Thanks for the replies

 

I have submitted as per the Tribunals direction everything in writing that I want to try and get across but not being legally trained in all this it is a nightmare

 

I even asked my MP to ask the council to suspend any magistrates fraud action until after the Appeal but basically was told " jog on " we will do as we please ! Tribunal is civil the magistrates is criminal even though I think they are connected got no where with the council

 

Also still have an Appeal pending with DWP which it was such a HUGE shock to find out in Magistrates Court the council were prosecuting that for the DWP

 

I have to leave certain meds off or I cant reason properly when I am trying to put things together

 

thanks for the comments always helpfull as usuall

 

kind regards

 

sinkinghelp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Thanks for the replies

 

I have submitted as per the Tribunals direction everything in writing that I want to try and get across but not being legally trained in all this it is a nightmare

 

I even asked my MP to ask the council to suspend any magistrates fraud action until after the Appeal but basically was told " jog on " we will do as we please ! Tribunal is civil the magistrates is criminal even though I think they are connected got no where with the council

 

Also still have an Appeal pending with DWP which it was such a HUGE shock to find out in Magistrates Court the council were prosecuting that for the DWP

 

I have to leave certain meds off or I cant reason properly when I am trying to put things together

 

thanks for the comments always helpfull as usuall

 

kind regards

 

sinkinghelp

 

If the DWP and HB tribunal are regarding the same issue, you can ask, in writing, to have them heard at the same time by the same Tribunal.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello estellyn

 

Thank you for the reply that was something else I have just learnt !

 

Sadly because of the way the council have processed my Appeal the DWP Appeal ended up way in front and was dealt with some time ago, which is why I am now waiting for a statement of reason from the Tribunal Judge so that decision can be challenged.

 

 

 

kind regards

 

sinkinghelp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nick

 

This is something I know zero about, but at a guess, I would wonder if the council would send a criminal solicitor to a civil appeal. I would say: no. I stand to be corrected on this.

 

Also, and again it is only based on the vaguest of impressions, but because civil and criminal matters are separate but linked streams, I was under the impression that it is quite possible for a criminal matter to be heard before a civil matter, which is why it is important to get your appeal in ASAP.

 

Which is academic in your situation, I know. Still, if you have a separate council civil appeal coming up, then it might be worth trying to dissect what went wrong in your previous appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...