Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Block and bounce back all emails.   Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • Dave if I run you by a different analogy.  Imagine you are doing 45 mph down Park Lane and a police car has clocked you doing that. When you get the Notice of Intended Prosecution they claim you were speeding in Piccadilly. So although you were speeding you weren't speeding in Piccadilly. Result -case would be thrown out. Same thing here. The contract refers to an area in Ruislip with a postcode  of HA4 OFY. On every  pcn  they have put the car in HA4 OEY. I admit that they have the correct postcode on the claimform but the car cannot be in two places at once. By pursuing Rocky on the wrong postcode means they had no reasonable cause to ask the DVLA for his details.Met does not have a contract to issue PCNs in that postcode. It is not desperation though it would be embarrassing for Met in Court and the case should be thrown out. The NTD can say whatever it wants but the NTK fails to specify the parking period and fails to ask the driver to pay S9[2][b] so that PCN does not comply with the Act so only the driver liable. And times on the photographs on the PCN are just that. Times on a photograph not on the PCN as stated in the Act.   Your strongest point is the PCN [the NTK ] is not compliant and as you were not the driver you are not liable so should go first.  Not only is it not compliant but the postcode on the NTK is different from the one on the Claim form. If the one on the NTK was wrong then Met have breached Rocky's GDPR since they had no reasonable cause to contact the DVLA as they did not have a contract  that covered that postcode and so misled the DVLA. That should be sufficient to win.  With regards to their WS sometimes the rogues leave it till the last moment to send to prevent Defendants being able to respond to what has been said. So don't send your WS until the last day. If theirs hasn't arrived by then add to your WS that their WS not received and ask that it be ignored.If it does arrive in time, then you can still amend your WS to answer any of their spurious points. As a lay person you will be granted a days latitude at least. PS do not foret to include S9[2][b] in your WS
    • Quote of the day “Head in hands and reviewing how useful my contact book will be in five weeks' time.” a Tory lobbyist, who’s not doing so good - Marie Le Conte
    • Another email ( they are coming thick and fast now) - slightly more threatening, telling me how great they are for trying to help me find a solution and how bad i am for ignoring them.     
    • I also started getting OTPs to a mobile number that I since have had to change after 10 years in case it was compromised.  The only card that I had provided to Lyca was a virtual card that they had stored for payment processing.   TLDR - Lyca are claiming no breach, there is definitely a breach. ICO are useless and havent heard from Lyca.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Vodafone refusal to put through to manager.


CKenny
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4567 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've just gotten off the phone with vodafone customer services, and I am absolutely fuming! :mad2:

I signed up to a contract 6 months ago and was sold a Nexus S, which I was told at the time had a Super AMOLED display. Basically, I didn't realise it at the time, but there's more than one kind of Nexus S!:roll: I was sold an i9023 model, which does NOT have an Amoled display, but something else which doesn't seem to be as bright or as clear compared with my friend, who has a different Samsung phone. Other than that, the phones seem identical so I didn't realise it until very recently. I rang vodafone today about something else, but figured when I was on the phone to them, I would tell them about this problem to see what they could do about it. The guy on the phone was really quite rude. He told me I'd have to take the phone back to the shop to complain about being mis-sold and so-called "customer services" could do nothing over the phone. When I pointed out that I bought it in a Vodafone shop and had now moved house, meaning it wasn't at all convenient to go back there, he basically told me that was tough luck. He then implied that I was totally stupid to not have realised that I was sold the wrong phone and was being completely ridiculous to bring it up at this stage!! (Possibly he was right, but not appreciated!:-x) When I asked him to speak to his supervisor, he simply said "No"!!!! Nothing else, no reason why, just "No".

I realise that 6 months down the line is kind of late to be complaining that I was sold the wrong phone, but are they allowed to refuse to escalate my complaint like that??:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have a member of the vodafone webteam that comes on this forum, go to http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/telecoms-mobile-fixed-internet/213340-vodafone-webteam-customers-problems.html and contact them, you will receive a response which will include a reference number, post it back here and lee_vodaphone will look into it for you. ;)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a big difference between the LCD screen and the AMOLED screen, were you assured you would get the AMOLED screen at the point of sale?

 

Personally, having worked in call centers, I can tell you that a "Manager" or a "Supervisor" are no higher trained than the CSAs, and in a lot of cases have only received basic training on the products as they hare hired to manage the staff NOT solve customers disputes. However I would add that the Vodafone "complaints code" does state you can escalate your complaint to a "team manager", so the CSA in question does need reminding of that.

 

Follow Cerb's advice and contact the web relations team using code WRT135, give them a link to this thread, then post the automated reply number here just so all the details marry up. I would expect Lee to reach an agreement with you quickly :)

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, I will try that!

I was definitely told that it had an AMOLED display when I was sold the phone. It was only when I saw somebody else's phone that I realised how rubbish the display on mine was!.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just to update, someone from Vodafone got back to me mid-week last week and apologised for the actions of the customer services operator. Said they are going to handle the phone problem directly so that I don't have to go back to the store, and I'm waiting to hear from them further with regards to this (he did say that it might take a few days). We'll see what happens!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Cliona,

 

Whilst it's a shame to hear about your recent experience with us I'm pleased to see that one of my colleagues has since been in touch while I was away.

 

As you've quoted your email reference number I'll locate your account to make sure that everything has been addressed for you.

 

Kind regards,

 

Lee

 

Web Relations Team

 

Vodafone UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...