Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It is essential that you find out where the car is.  It is also essential to find out whether what you signed was an authorisation What precisely it was that you authorised.  I expect it was an authorisation and it certainly is going to be a big problem that you didn't read what you signed.  However you must find out and you must do it as quickly as possible.  If necessary start telephoning people but read our customer services guide first.  But then render everything in writing  
    • There are 19 documents received from SARS request, spread out over 2 messages too big to put all on one. I have also received the Notification of allocation to the small claims track hearing for beginning nov 2024 SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-11.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-12.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-13.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-14.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-15.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-16.pdf
    • 050124 DcbLegal-1_1.pdf 050124 DcbLegal-2_1.pdf 121223 DCbLegal_1.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-1.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-2.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-3.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-4.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-5.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-6.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-7.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-8.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-9.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-10.pdf
    • From the Law Gazette. Paula Vennells had faith in her lawyers - and threw them under the bus. Post Office Inquiry: Paula Vennells trusted her lawyers and then threw them under the bus | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK If we are to believe the former chief executive, she was simply too trusting of her general counsel.  
    • Thank you dx. Not very nice reading, but I have learnt a bit, I will need to go over some of them again later.  Something I picked up from those posts are Auxillis use of tick boxes and electronic signatures.   I need to find out what the tow truck driver made me sign for.  He put the car on the trailer and locked it down, then got a phone in a big protective case out and just handed it to me. I didn't even think what I was signing, I presumed it was related to the condition of the car on retrieval from the ditch and their collection and assumption of responsibility for the insurance company.    unclebulgaria67, I struggle to easily write concise, to the point posts.  I thought that my initial post was already too long and wordy so tried to keep it brief and to the point. I didn't write every moment of the accident the way I told the police or insurers because most of it would be a waste of your time as my innocence is not my concern. The other party fled the scene.  My immediate concern is my car being taken without consent, stored where it will accrue charges, get treated in any manner of ways because they assume its getting written off and dont need to look after it and then possibly taken to a car auction site where I will have to pay additional fees to get it back if it is declared a write off. I am also in increasing amounts of pain in my lower back and neck and ever increasing sense of injustice and foreboding.    I do not see how my original post could go 50/50 personally, but I am reading my words with the images I have in my head, so have taken your warning on board and will make sure I don't mess up on any other documents.    So as far as I know someone from Vizion who have been hired by Auxillis is going to assess my vehicle at some point in the future.  The form I filled in for Vizion said that an approved assessor would attend my house to assess if the car is worthy of being repaired.  My car is not at my house, why the discrepancy? I agree that it is likely that they are not going to want to repair my car, I think it is worth it, I know what I have done to keep it sound, but market value and the astronomical cost of repairs...  Which is why I am worried that my car has been pulled in to a scam against my consent. How much is it going to cost me to get it back when it could be sitting on my drive.  It is just being used to charge someone storage, then will go to copart and they will charge someone storage, then they will charge me a release fee and I will have to find a way to get it back to my house which will cost more money.  All when I repeatedly requested that the car be taken off the truck when it was outside my house.    I have advised Auxillis that I repeatedly requested my car be taken off the tow truck outside my house and was not listened to.  I stated that I was left feeling that my car had been taken without my consent and was not provided a valid reason for them keeping the car.  I want to know where my car is, why it is there and would like it brought back to my house to await their assessor who already thinks the car is at my house.  Sorry bankfodder i forgot to ask who authorised it, but i will ask. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Disciplinary hearing decision and sick leave - does it suspend the appeal?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4595 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

my company is to issue their disciplinary hearing decision in writting while i am not there (monday). The decision is very likely dismissal. I will have 5 days to appeal.

 

Since I am on sick leave while the decision is given, does this suspend the decision issue and the appeal? The latter is most important: if sick, and unfit to review my case, do they have to wait for me to return to work and give me another 5 days to consider the appeal? Or do I have to still take the 5 days while sick to make my decision, re: appeal?

 

This is for Monday 31st Oct, so fairly urgent! many thks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

tks for the reply. I started feeling unwell on Fri, due to the stress and emotional toll. My employer is to issue the decision on Monday, regardless i am there or not. They will give me 5 days to appeal. But since I am sick and unable to work, does this suspends the appeal process until I resume normal work?

 

tks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doubt it. If it was a long term illness and one which the Equality Act applied then reasonable adjustments could have been asked for. But in your circumstances I would have thought they would plough on regardless.

 

I would write to them and ask that the 5 days start from when you receive the letter or email. Employers will want to be seen to be fair, despite the fact that they are not fair, the appearance of fairness is what they want so they have something to hang their reputation on. So it would mean nothing to them to extend it by a day or so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, could I write to them and ask them to wait for my return from illness to start the appeal from there? If so, i could therefore extend my employment by 5 days (the sick leave). I could justify this on fairness and the grounds that i am unfit to be able to carry the work associated with the appeal, due to my work related stress and injuries?

 

tough one, i know. My employer has been manufacturing my exit, so i have no remorse bending the rules and playing street smart.... Shame, i know...

 

tk you

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey

 

it's a long story.... But my employer has been using a variety of petty facts, feedback, notes, timings, etc to be able to twist thgs to their favour and manufacture the fact i was performing under performance. I went thru a 3 months process which happened to be biased and unfair. I tried to agree on a compromise agreement but they gave me nothing better than what i would get if dismissed. Since then, I have played against the clock and tried to grab as many paid days as possible... Even solicitors arent sure how to qualify my exit as unfair dismissal, so it's too expensive to fight on- even on a no win no fee basis.

 

All in all, i would like to grab those 5 extra days, pretending i am sick and therefore suspending the appeal until i resume work.

 

If that doesnt work, I will appeal and the process will start from scratch again- giving me more stress, more wasted time, but more money....

 

crazy!

Link to post
Share on other sites

well- it is stressful, and facing dismissal isnt fun. Especially when I have a mortgage with my ex partner and that she is threatening me with legal proceedings to force the sale!

 

Hence the reason is it is all over the place at the moment, and having the chance to delay things is helpful as it gives me time and money to fight on all fronts.

 

I am not sure i understand your point, though. So what are you suggesting, re: sick leave and appeal suspension?

 

Tk you :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say that, as you are off sick, they should notify you in writing of their decision (in fact they should in any case as it's good practice!) I woukd also say that, even though they are reaching their decision on Monday, they should send you written notification of the outcome and the 5 days should run from when you receive written confirmation - 2 days from posting letter if sent 1st class (and, IMHO, they should send by registered/signed for post).

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I doubt being off sick will stop the 5 days appeal time frame however, it may well be that, having received your appeal they may not carry out any further meetings while your on sick leave but that's not guaranteed.

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok - i see. It wasnt my initial intention to appeal, on the basis that I have beyond enough of the cloack and dagger situation. I was hoping to hold the process on for 5 days, and not appeal. This would have given me enough time / benefits to carry on with the situation.

 

However, if they were to no hold the process on until I resume employment, then i may have to appeal. In which case, we are talking about another 2 wks or so...Minimum!

 

this has been dragging on since end of Aug....

 

Crazy!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The other thing to consider,

 

If they do dismiss you your entitlement to salary and benefits will stop from that date.

 

If you appeal against the dismissal they won't automatically start paying or continue paying you. You would have to wait for the conclusion of the appeal process and will only receive payment for the time of the appeal process if they re-instate you.

 

Sorry if this isn't what you want to hear,

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello

 

thank you- i had not considered that they may stop payment right by the time they issue their decision. Given I have 5 days to appeal, i'll be surprised if they do stop, indeed. However that is something to consider.

 

what they are goiing to issue is a warning for under performance. This will push me to dismissal, having received final written warning already.

 

From the company's guidelines, I have the right to appeal, in which case a new hearing will take place.

 

To be noted, I was systematically invited to the hearings on Fridays. I had the chance to postpone at times, but i really think my company wants my employment to terminate on a friday!!! For example, I was very pressured to attend the hearing last friday, and they had used all sort of power words for me to comply. Sadly, i couldnt do it as i advised the day before.

 

All in all they are ****ed off... and they want me out... on a friday... with minimal damages and costs to them.

 

I'll be surprised if my entitlement to salary and benefits will stop right by their decision but i will investigate. Many thanks for the pointer.

 

cheers

 

frog

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are there any issues regarding disability or discrimination?

 

Also, you have obviously taken some legal advice which may or may not help you. Many lawyers hedge there advice and look at things in a black and white way, so the advice you have been given from your side may on the flip of a coin also be problematic for the employer.

 

If you 'feel' that they have been unfair then there may be a case to consider at an Employment Tribunal. You have already tried a compromise agreement but the employer didn't have anything to lose by offering you nothing. If you issued an ET1 against them they then HAVE to reply to the court. They would normally have solicitors do this for you. Once you get to that stage ....they have something to lose ie the compensation package + their own solicitor costs, which could be considerable. Employers are normally advised by solicitors as to the CHEAPEST way out of a problem.... that is when you compromise not when they have nothing to lose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello papa

 

tks for the reply, as always

 

No disability or discrimination. Albeit i am from French origins...

 

I will research the ET1, that is not something brought to my knowledge. However they had nothing to lose on the compromise agreement and therefore used their legal team internally, to basically offer the same compensation as in dismissal. They even refused to support the cost of my legal fees while dealing with the compromise agreement.

 

The thing with the tribunal is that: 1. it may cost me lots of money? 2. there is no garantees the tribunal will turn onto my favour 3. they clearly have manufactured my exit over a long period of time (6 months +) however this is hard to prove with B&W facts. Solicitors have seen clear thru my employer's game, however they have been reluctant to help me, given the sheer number of hours needed and the money upfront.

 

All in all, i am left with postponing my dismissal time and again, using the law and a variety of tricks..... A bit of a shame, but hey, i have to support my living and my employer is very very very rich. Robin Hoods anyone??

 

tks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi froginlondon

 

Could you just confirm that this was actually a Disciplinary Hearing and was the decision made at that meeting and what the decision was?

 

1. If the decison was made at the meeting and you were informed you should also at that time have been told your rights to appeal and the procedure. Also it is good practice to send you that decision in writing with the reasons for dismissal.

 

2. If the hearing was held but no decision was reached but they were taking further advice/or still considering the decision at that time they should have informed you as good practice and that they will let you know of there decision by xx date. (If this has happen as good practice once the decison has been reached the appeal 5 days cannot start until they have actually inform you of the decision them the countdown starts and as good practice they should also send you this in writing).

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they take a dislike to you being French? Race Discrimination?

 

ET1 is the form you fill in at an Employment Tribunal to summarise what your claim is. The employer has to respond on a form ET3. Then the fun starts.

 

1. It could cost you a lot of money, or nothing if you do it yourself. Many on here will talk you through procedural steps. If your claim is vexatious you could be lumbered with costs... and of course there is the appeal process which could also cost.

 

2. Tribunals can be fickle .... but compromise agreements are normally negotiated at the doors of the court.... cheaper for the employer.

 

3. Evidence being hard to prove does not mean that you cannot actually prove it. My wife and I had enough evidence that took 2,500 pages in the bundles and 3 weeks to go through at a trial... but they negotiated on day 1 and the trial did not proceed.

 

Can't you merely get another job, or is it in the Financial services and difficult at the moment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Froginlondon:

 

You say that you are expecting the ‘disciplinary hearing decision’ in writing on Monday. Are we to take it that you actually attended the disciplinary hearing itself in person? Do we also take it that you are reconciled to the findings of that hearing being unfavourable to you?

 

You do not specify the reasons/reasons for the disciplinary action. You do not specify any solid grounds you may have for appealing against the decision that you seem convinced has been reached. Nor do you ask for any help in making a case for yourself, or supporting your appeal.

 

“All in all, i would like to grab those 5 extra days, pretending i am sick and therefore suspending the appeal until i resume work.

 

If that doesnt work, I will appeal and the process will start from scratch again- giving me more stress, more wasted time, but more money....”

 

Your main concern appears to be how to extend your employment status for another week, for personal gain, by fair means or foul. You are more or less suggesting that your ‘illness’ is a ruse to defraud your employer out of an additional week’s wages. To that end you are asking for support for, and complicity in, your deception.

 

Do you have a note from a doctor stating that your sudden illness was brought about by the events surrounding your present predicament, and that this illness is such that you cannot possibly proceed with your appeal? Scheming on here does not appear to present you with any problems.

 

Most subscribers and contributors to this site do so on the understanding that they are helping to put right a wrong, not to aid and abet underhand or illegal activities. The reputation, integrity and honesty of this site would be compromised, it may even be forced to shut down, if it became known merely as an instrument for aiding duplicity, abetting illegality and attempting to pervert the course of justice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@ conciliator I see your point. See initial question. My case is long and extensive and I benefit from professional advice. Thank you, though

 

@ stu007 the decision was meant for Friday. I managed to delay it to Monday 31st Oct. The decision has been taken, and now it is a matter of communication. Both face to face and in writing. I will receive documents. I do not plan to attend the face to face meeting on Monday.

 

@ papasmurf nothing about the race, but the frenchness didnt do me any favours. An external stakeholder turned on me, and my boss was too happy to leverage this and use it against me. I suspect my boss and the external stakeholder formed an alliance to discuss and agree on the terms of my exit and timings, however this is virtually impossible to prove... There are nonetheless written communication between the two, expressing frustration towards me, my skills, and support. For the ET1, i have little time, and with no job, I am best focussing on sorting out myself (i live alone). As much as I would love to take them to Tribunal, this is difficult, and I lack the basics knowledge to be able to do it myself, successfully. And I prefer not to limber the court and have to support the cost!

 

All in all... I keep learning! I am obviously very grateful for your time today. I wouldnt rely on your time and support if the situation was a bit tricky. Not to mention the ex partner forcing the sale of the flat! I am happy to leave my employer, however my exit is clearly unfair. It is a shame, though, that we havent agreed on a compromise agreement, and that I have difficulties proving and supporting my grievances to a tribunal. Not here to do wrong, but to restore a bit of justice/fairness into my case by abiding to employment law (that line is for you conciliator).

 

Tks all!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...