Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All. A family friends car was having issues when she was on a trip visiting family up north at the begining of January.  She ended up leaving it at my friends garage in the same location, who parked it on his forecourt to investigate the issue, howver he said most likely it is beyond economical repair as its a serious gearbox fault. In the meantime i replaced her car with one of my spare cars. The insurance on the car then expired in at the end of January.  When the insurance expired, I sent a paper V890 paper as i didnt have her V5 Reference number in hand to do it online (i have a copy of this).  She didnt mention she hadnt recieved any confirmation as she didnt know if she would get one.  She then cancelled her road tax at the end of March (i think) as she was paying by DD. She then was travelling up north so didnt get her ,ail until last week. She recievd a letter dated 09/04/2024 stating she had failed to insure the vehcile and there was a £100 fine which could be reduced to £50 if she respons by 11/05/2024.  As soon as we noticed, i got her to dig  out the V5 and SORN'd the vehicle.   My friend has been a bit slow in checking the fault, however i suspect it will still be scrapped and is still on his forecourt. Is this possible to appeal?
    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
    • you made it very confusing, though i doubt any of it was ever read by the delivery franchise for DPD. your saving grace might well be you didn't select your own address (though if you are all the same postcode..??) and neither mentioned a safe space other than another neighbour. but with the actual delivery address on the parcel, it appears the driver had a choice of 3 addresses, all under the same post code with differing house numbers. so chose the label one but left it on your doorstep. play it carefully and along with the photo and the retailers requirement you should be ok.   dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA Proposed 12 month maximum WRAG - counting from when?


Error_Prone
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4594 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am currently getting contribution based ESA.

 

I was recently moved from the Support Group to the Work Related Activity Group (although I'm currently seeking a reconsideration of this decision).

 

Today I received the standard letter warning of the proposed limit of one year maximum for those in the WRAG. Despite reading the letter several times I'm still not clear when this one year period begins in my case.

 

Is it a year from the date I was moved to the WRAG?

 

or

 

Is it a year from when I started getting ESA?

 

If it is the latter then I assume my ESA will stop in the spring of 2012 unless my reconsideration is accepted?

 

If anybody can clarify I would be most grateful.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. I found this on the directgov website, hope it contains the right details.

 

My best, HB

 

When would this change take effect?

 

The earliest this change can become law is April 2012.

 

How the 12 month period would be counted

 

Should the change in the law go ahead, the 12 months would start from the first day you were paid contribution-based ESA. Any time you have spent in the Support Group would be excluded, as would any gaps in your claim.

 

If you moved from Incapacity Benefit or Severe Disablement Allowance, the 12 months would start from the date your old benefit was changed to contribution-based ESA and you were placed in the Work Related Activity Group. Again, time spent in the Support Group would be excluded.

 

If you have already been receiving contribution-based ESA for 12 months and you are in the Work Related Activity Group, you would immediately lose entitlement.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How the 12 month period would be counted

 

Should the change in the law go ahead, the 12 months would start from the first day you were paid contribution-based ESA. Any time you have spent in the Support Group would be excluded, as would any gaps in your claim.

 

 

Thanks, that is very helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What exactly are the sick and disabled expected to live on when their benefit "runs out", I can't honestly see employers giving jobs to them when there are millions of able bodied people out there.

 

Or perhaps I don't understand the point?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What exactly are the sick and disabled expected to live on when their benefit "runs out", I can't honestly see employers giving jobs to them when there are millions of able bodied people out there.

 

Or perhaps I don't understand the point?

 

Contributory based ESA is what is being limited; income related ESA will still be available to those who do not have other income or whose income is below the threshold.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What exactly are the sick and disabled expected to live on when their benefit "runs out", I can't honestly see employers giving jobs to them when there are millions of able bodied people out there.

 

Or perhaps I don't understand the point?

 

Their partner is expected to look after them. :( Moral - don't ever get sick and certainly don't go into a relationship where the other one works...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly Count Orlock, I have been in a WRAG for 6 months now. If anyone can find me an employer that is willing to take someone on that has constant pain, drops things through weak grip, needs to sleep in an afternoon due to chronic fatigue, frequent days off due to not being able to get up out of bed and move about for hours after and who would have to turn up to work in their pyjamas as their pain is too severe to complete the simplest task of dressing please let me know I would go out to work in a flash, there is no support out there from this system at all for those who suffer diseases that are not curable, but can be managed to a certain extent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I now get contibution based ESA, DLA and Industrial injuries benefit.

I have a child at home who is working.

I have no other income.

If this new time limit comes into force then what will happen to me mext April, will they put me onto income based ESA?

They can't assume that we are now fit for work.

Does any one know if employers will take on people who are taking strong medication, would we be covered by insurance?

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Norby 500, The difference between contribution based and income based esa is, income based is means tested, ie any income you or your partner have coming in, savings etc, contribution based is not. Can I ask what group you have been placed in after your successful tribunal.If you have been placed in the work related group you will have to partake in work related activities at job centre plus, also you will only be enntitled to contribution esa for 12months from when the original decsion was made if the new legislation gets passed in parliment and this will come into force from April of 2012, its not been passed yet, if you meet the criteria after this date you will be able to claim income based, think I got that right?. If you have been placed in the support group nothing will change, except maybe a reassessment to see if you are still entitled to esa. I think I got all that right? am sure someone will correct me if I"m wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...