Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi T911 and welcome to CAG. As you say, an interesting screw up. So much for quality control! Anyway, our regular advice is to ignore all of their increasingly threatening missives... UNLESS you get a letter of claim, then come back here and we'll help you write a "snotty letter" to help them decide whether to take it any further with their stoopid pics. If you get mail you're unsure of, just upload it for the team to have a look.
    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capital one HELP..


mudbutt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4450 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You basically take court action seeking :-

 

1. An order that the bank must disclose your data in response to your SAR.

 

2. Compensation (just a nominal amount) for the bank's failure to supply the data as originally required.

 

Examples:-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?286215-Barclays-want-to-start-court-action-help-please!&p=3219188&viewfull=1#post3219188

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?206050-Webby-v-Barclaycard-**WON-with-CCI-and-Older-Charges**

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

........or you can follow through your threat and take county court action seeking token compensation at the court's discretion, plus the disclosure of the data they've failed to supply.

 

@ DonkeyB - did you mean the FOS and not the OFT as I don't think the OFT will involve themselves in such issues on an individual case.

 

:-)

 

Indeed slick, but every complaint to the OFT is racked up against a company’s licence application. If we don’t complain, nothing will happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Donkey,

 

Now I see where you're coming from.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got a reply claiming that they sent my data recorded delivery on the 12/11/11 (NOT) and that if i want them to sent me another batch i have to pay another £10 .. what do do now im beyond upset...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MB, I feel your pain and frustration where these people are concerned! It's all designed to waste time, drag it out and put you off! :tsk:

 

So they say they sent it RD on the 12th November? I would find that hard to believe given the 12th was a Saturday! But as DB says, they must proof it by providing you with a copy of the track and trace confirmation!

 

This may seem a silly question, but did you send your SAR by RD/track and trace? If you did have you checked online to see when it was delivered? If you can get that information, print off a copy. Also call the Post Office and find out if your postal order has been cashed and ask them to send you proof. Armed with this information, take them to court and get the Judge to force compliance as they are taking the mick - they have had 68 days to comply which is more than enough time!

 

Also as DB says, Complain!

 

Don't let them fob you off.

 

Best,

 

Coffeeangel

Link to post
Share on other sites

DB, why doesn't that surprise Coffee! I'm sure they must have a lucky dip for the bog standard template letter of the day they are going to send out designed to confuse or annoy or both and pick a date to enter into it that they will either respond to you or tell you have they have responded by sticking the calendar for the month on the wall and throwing darts at it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update####

update####

 

i don't have a scanner so i will type the letter verbatim.

 

I sent cap1 a refund charge letter and my spreadsheet with the charges and they sent me this reply.

 

" thank you for your letter dated 27 dec 2011 regarding £12 default sums added to your account. As a responsible lender cap 1 has an obligation to ensure that the information it reports is accurate and that it will not mislead future lenders. There is a consistent approach for financial institutions to record acc management activity in order to assess a customers credit worthiness. This practise is in accordance with data protection principles, guidelines issued by the information commissioner . As your account has been reported correctly, i cannot agree to remove the default from your credit file as you have requested.

 

I have reviewed your acc and considered the merit of your complaint. The oft has not challenged the right of banks to charge default sums, just the level of those defaults sums. Following the publication of the oft's report , cap 1 , in line with other banks, reduced the level of default sums to £12 each in sep 2006. I can see the default sums have all been correctly applied to your acc as a result of the way you managed your acc. Cap 1 believes these charges are both fair and lawful and as a result, no refund is due. We also note you have requested that cap1 pays statutory interest at 8% on the default sums pursuant to section 69 of the county court act 1984.however, statutory interest only becomes payable once judgement has been given , and any amount awarded is entirely at the discretion of the courts. You are therefore not entitled to ant statutory interest whilst the matter remains pre-action. Furthermore, refusal to accept a reasonable offer of settlement purely on the basis that you wish to recover statutory interest could be seen as a breach of the pre action protocol, making you potentially liable to cost sanctions"

 

need some advice on what to do next if anything... Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your tired letter, I will pay you the sum of £1 a month less for any charges you have applied and state you will not refund, up and until I have paid what I owe, no charges will be paid.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Muddy,

 

Have they still failed to supply the data required by your SAR or has this now been provided to you. If not, and you think further default charges are likley to have been made, you should pursue the SAR issue by a court claim as mentioned before.

 

If you do, in fact, now have all the default charges data, you will have to file a court claim to get them back.

 

Before this, please remind me:-

 

1. Over what period have the default charges been made.

 

2. Is there an outstanding a/c balance.

 

3. Is it being paid currently or is it in arrears.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Slick132 thank you for your reply.

 

I got my SAR reply from them. I put together a spreadsheet of all late and over limit charges which came up to a total of £168.00 plus £99.22 interest at statutory rate... The card its self was closed in 2010 I have default registered on my credit score because of this stupid card. It is in arrears of £119 which I have been fighting with debit collectors since, I told them to prove how I owe this money. The letter above was a reply to my request for charges to be refunded to me..I have not made a payment to this account for about 2yrs. the charges are from may 2009 to march 2010.

Edited by mudbutt
Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume Cap1 finally sent you the data which you needed to do your spreadsheet so there's no data outstanding. Is this right ?

 

On the basis of their refusal to refund, I think you should update your spreadsheet but leave off the entry for Stat'y Int't. Send it with the Prelim Claim letter, this time headed Letter Before Action.

 

If they fail to refund in the 14 days you give them, file a claim at your local court enclosing your (again updated) spreadsheet which will include Stat'y Int't at 8%.

 

You can also ask the court to order the removal of the default and any adverse credit data on the basis that it includes unfair penalty charges.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...