Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lewisham PCN - contravention 82-parked after the expiry of paid for time. increased from £40 to £120+


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4622 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received a parking ticket from Lewisham council for £40, I appealed as i explained i had a dizzy spell due to exhaustion/dehydration and whilst i felt uneasy to drive and waited 10 mins for the symptoms to subside a traffic warden decided to still give me a ticket, even though i explained i was not well enough to even move it and give me 10 mins to compose myself with water!

 

I appealed and lost as they said i should have got a doctor certificate to verify this!! understandably for a dizzy spell and its not due to on-going medical issue the doctor was unable to verify anything, rightly so.....

 

As i lost the appeal i was informed my fine had increased to £80, i then told the council that i was unable to pay this and would pay in instalments (as on JSA!), i was told i would have to wait for bailiffs to write to arrange this as the council do not take instalments and only FULL PAYMENT!!

 

Today, I received a letter "charge certificate" stating my fine is now £120 (£80 plus £40 charge certificate!) and if i do not settle in full then bailiffs will be obtaining a warrant and will be their charges plus £7............

 

I am annoyed that i let my original appeal go but i was informed that was the adjudicator final decision......what can i do regarding this whole mess, how can i avoid all this increase in fee's, so unfair.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the ticket doubles if not paid, then they add another 50% so 40 turns to 80 then 120, then you will get charged for warrant , then 28% for every visit 3 visits max

My respect to people who post regularly and help people out on here. Without your help alot of wrongs would have been committed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a parking ticket from Lewisham council for £80, I appealed as i explained i had a dizzy spell due to exhaustion/dehydration and whilst i felt uneasy to drive and waited 10 mins for the symptoms to subside a traffic warden decided to still give me a ticket, even though i explained i was not well enough to even move it and give me 10 mins to compose myself with water!
 
I appealed and lost as the adjudicator said in the photographic evidence he could not see me behind the wheel!! ( I replied back to state that at the time the traffic warden was taking the photo, i had got out the car to ask him to be abit more sympathetic to me and this explains while at that very moment i was not inside the vehicle!! (no response!!)
 
As i lost the appeal
 
i was informed my fine would still remain at £80, i then told the council that i was unable to pay this and would pay in instalments (as on JSA!), i was told i would have to wait for bailiffs to write to arrange this as the council do not take instalments and only FULL PAYMENT!!
 
In their letter they never mentioned anything about making instalments via a bailiff (AFTER the bailiff have added their fee's!) all they mentioned was a additional £7 fee for the court!.......
 
Today, I receive a letter "charge certificate" stating my fine is now £120 (£80 plus £40 charge certificate!) and if i do not settle in full then bailiffs will be obtaining a warrant and will be their charges plus £7 in court fee's????............
 
I am annoyed that i let my original appeal go but i was informed that was the adjudicator final decision......what can i do regarding this whole mess, how can i avoid all this increase in fee's from bailiffs and just pay in instalments via the bailiff for the £80?
 
I am not refusing to pay, but i just do not see why, i will penalised with bailiff fee's because i cannot pay all at once.....do they have every right to add whatever fee's they wish?
 
 
 
Link to post
Share on other sites

..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very confusing.

 

This case is nothing to do with bailiffs, so don't confuse the issue. At the moment it is with the council and it's between you and them.

 

When you asked for a payment plan, did you put it in writing, and did the council reply to you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i didnt say it was with bailiffs, i was asking how to avoid bailiff cost and pay in instalements,which is next stage!

 

i explained this early on in this thread, i did write to council and they wrote back saying they do not except instalement directly and await bailiffs contact to arrange this....i realise i wil have to pay £127 via the bailiff but how do i avoid paying bailiff costs too?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not very good advice from the council, if it does go as far as the bailiffs there will be a large increase when they add their fees - which will make it much more than £127, and not all bailiffs will accept a payment plan either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how can they give such untrue advice! i just called them and they said as long as i respond to the 1st bailiff letter, i can arrange payment plan of the £127 and the bailiff wil NOT add their charges unless i miss a payment, is this not the case? im confused!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i didnt say it was with bailiffs, i was asking how to avoid bailiff cost and pay in instalements,which is next stage!

 

You are focussing on the bailiff issue but you don't need to - they aren't involved and you can probably still sort this out directly with the council - or at least try, without bailiffs ever getting involved.

 

i did write to council and they wrote back saying they do not except instalement directly and await bailiffs contact to arrange this

 

I can't believe you have a letter from the council advising you to await bailiff action in order to set up a payment plan. It's absurd.

 

What I think you should do is ask for a meeting with someone at the council to discuss the situation. Take with you evidence of your income and rent etc so they can see that you aren't in a position to pay in one go. Ask them to agree regular payments with you. There is no reason why they will not, as long as they see that you are genuine.

 

This is a far better way to approach matters than letting the debt get registered at court then have a bailiff warrant against you - and as Raykay says, not only will the debt get higher, but the bailiff might not allow a payment plan either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get that in writing from the council!! Remember the saying 'If it's not in writing, it never happened'.

 

I agree with Jamberson, try to resolve the problem without involving bailiffs because once they do get involved, it can be very expensive.

Edited by Raykay
Link to post
Share on other sites

i have just spoken to lewisham parking services again, they clearly state they will not accept instalements, only FULL! and they say they have not instructed the bailiff yet til they register the debt and said there bailiffs have been told to accept instalement as long as i respond to first letter no bailiff costs wil be added! they declined to put it in writing! they said if bailiff tries to add fee's then call them back! i offered the first payment now with my debit card, they declined and said i cant speak with no-one, its their procedure!

 

i do have letter stating instalement via bailiff, not them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are not being straight up with you - the council has no ability to decide whether bailiffs will arrange payment plans, or on what terms. Also they won't stop the bailiff charging you for anything they do.

 

If I were you I wouldn't take "no" for an answer right now. I would get onto someone senior and see them in person, and put formal requests to them in writing. That's what I'd do ... up to you how you want to play it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are not being straight up with you - the council has no ability to decide whether bailiffs will arrange payment plans, or on what terms. Also they won't stop the bailiff charging you for anything they do.

 

The baliffs are agents of the Council they can instruct them to do anything they like as long as its legal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bailiffs are private firms and they aren't under orders from the council. They often cooperate with the council's wishes because it suits their mutual relationship, but I have never heard of a council instructing a bailiff as to what terms of payment they have to accept. And anyway, why would the council want to pass it on at all, if payment is being offered? It's a bizarre idea.

 

Also, if the council genuinely are advising the OP to wait for the bailiffs to come in, just in order to set up a payment plan, they are in my view abusing the system. TEC don't grant warrants in order to facilitate payment plans. I suspect the council is blagging it to get the case out of their hands. The OP will suffer the brunt of bailiff fees, and still no guarantee of a plan, for no good reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

green and mean, if that is indeed true and they told me they are telling the bailiff to take instalements and no bailiff fee's will be addf if i agree payment plan on reciept of 1st bailiff letter and only if i default i wil incur such costs, why wont they verify this in writing? she assured me on 3 calls today!

Link to post
Share on other sites

jamberson, do you think i should just start making instalements via there payment line? i have a gut feeling your prediction may be right! if they are sure then why not put it in writing! lewisham say its their 'policy' not to accept instalement directly! unbelievable!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bailiffs are private firms and they aren't under orders from the council. They often cooperate with the council's wishes because it suits their mutual relationship, but I have never heard of a council instructing a bailiff as to what terms of payment they have to accept. And anyway, why would the council want to pass it on at all, if payment is being offered? It's a bizarre idea.

 

Also, if the council genuinely are advising the OP to wait for the bailiffs to come in, just in order to set up a payment plan, they are in my view abusing the system. TEC don't grant warrants in order to facilitate payment plans. I suspect the council is blagging it to get the case out of their hands. The OP will suffer the brunt of bailiff fees, and still no guarantee of a plan, for no good reason.

 

Complete tosh baliffs are contracted by the Council to enforce the debts, that is why different Councils have different baliffs they don't just roam the streets looking for debtors!! What you are saying is like suggesting the Council bin men can just collect when they feel like it because they work for a private refuse collection company, or NSL can just ignore Council enforcement instructions and ticket who they like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...