Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Engage Trying to evict me- Help+ lots of Fees to get back ! EVICTION STOPPED


Pupter
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3328 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No Ell-enn, the first we knew of it was a hand delivered envelope through our front door saying this man had visited us but we were out. As it was connected to our mortgage, the following morning I called the mortgage company and was told "Oh yes our solicitors send him to go through your I&E and discuss options with you, we are obliged to send him and you are charged whether you see him or not, its an automatic charge!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 175
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

No Ell-enn, the first we knew of it was a hand delivered envelope through our front door saying this man had visited us but we were out. As it was connected to our mortgage, the following morning I called the mortgage company and was told "Oh yes our solicitors send him to go through your I&E and discuss options with you, we are obliged to send him and you are charged whether you see him or not, its an automatic charge!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

They'll tell you anything ! Get the hearing overwith tomorrow and we'll tackle that next.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They'll tell you anything ! Get the hearing overwith tomorrow and we'll tackle that next.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck with your hearing, your case looks good to me too.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck with your hearing, your case looks good to me too.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

 

I arrived at court in plenty of time to find there were no advisers there to assist. Found the usher and signed in, at which point I was introduced to the representive from the other side, he looked about 20 but was a really nice man and said, "Having looked through your papers I can't see why the mortgage company haven't accepted your proposal but they are requesting that I oppose it on the basis that if the warrant was suspended you might default further down the line. This gave me a bit of a boost because it seemed a rather limited arguement. He ran through a couple of points with me, which I was easily able to clarify and then we chatted about general non case stuff as the judge was 20 mins late calling us.

 

On entry I found it was not to intimidating, just a room with the judge behind a desk, friendly smiles all around. The judge said he knew he was supposed to let me speak first as I am the bringer of the hearing but was it ok if the rep went first to just explain current conduct on the account. The poor man had been given several facts wrong, included the actual arrears amount. I let him speak though and waited my turn. Once I could speak I explained the actual figure, why the problems had arisen, my reasons for asking to stay put in the house and my plans to combat and clear the arrears.

 

The rep was still claiming the payments were the higher amount which included the insurance premiums but the judge said he was mistaken and it should be without that.

 

Then the judge said that he was going to suspend the warrant and not allow eviction because of two things:

 

1) He was very impressed with the pack I had presented to court and how I had conducted myself. He said if everyone presented their pack as well as mine a district judge's job would be so easy. He could see clearly all the facts and figures from my budget sheet (thank you CAG!) and my well presented statement (Thank You Ell-enn!) and my charges schedule (Thank you ukaviator!)

 

2) He could see that we were only in this position due to some unfortunate circumstances and that we were making every effort to right ourselves again, that our payment proposal was a reasonable, sensible offer and he felt we would be able to clear the arrears easily. He actually made the order for a lower amount than in our payment proposal but said if we wanted to pay the higher amount he suggested we did when we could.

 

As we left the room, he actually smiled and I think winked at me, what a lovely man he was. Once outside, the rep was also lovely and said he was happy for us that the outcome meant we could move on with our lives.

 

So first battle won and it is all down to you fantastic people for helping us. I went to collect my children and just hugged them all, I know it sounds a bit Hollywood but the relief of knowing we can stay in our home and the kids won't have to deal with all of this feels amazing.

 

So next battle is to get the mortgage company to refund us all the insurance premiums and I am going after them for all those charges.

 

To anyone going through this, the Caggers are right, I think a judge will try and keep you in your home if he possibly can

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

 

I arrived at court in plenty of time to find there were no advisers there to assist. Found the usher and signed in, at which point I was introduced to the representive from the other side, he looked about 20 but was a really nice man and said, "Having looked through your papers I can't see why the mortgage company haven't accepted your proposal but they are requesting that I oppose it on the basis that if the warrant was suspended you might default further down the line. This gave me a bit of a boost because it seemed a rather limited arguement. He ran through a couple of points with me, which I was easily able to clarify and then we chatted about general non case stuff as the judge was 20 mins late calling us.

 

On entry I found it was not to intimidating, just a room with the judge behind a desk, friendly smiles all around. The judge said he knew he was supposed to let me speak first as I am the bringer of the hearing but was it ok if the rep went first to just explain current conduct on the account. The poor man had been given several facts wrong, included the actual arrears amount. I let him speak though and waited my turn. Once I could speak I explained the actual figure, why the problems had arisen, my reasons for asking to stay put in the house and my plans to combat and clear the arrears.

 

The rep was still claiming the payments were the higher amount which included the insurance premiums but the judge said he was mistaken and it should be without that.

 

Then the judge said that he was going to suspend the warrant and not allow eviction because of two things:

 

1) He was very impressed with the pack I had presented to court and how I had conducted myself. He said if everyone presented their pack as well as mine a district judge's job would be so easy. He could see clearly all the facts and figures from my budget sheet (thank you CAG!) and my well presented statement (Thank You Ell-enn!) and my charges schedule (Thank you ukaviator!)

 

2) He could see that we were only in this position due to some unfortunate circumstances and that we were making every effort to right ourselves again, that our payment proposal was a reasonable, sensible offer and he felt we would be able to clear the arrears easily. He actually made the order for a lower amount than in our payment proposal but said if we wanted to pay the higher amount he suggested we did when we could.

 

As we left the room, he actually smiled and I think winked at me, what a lovely man he was. Once outside, the rep was also lovely and said he was happy for us that the outcome meant we could move on with our lives.

 

So first battle won and it is all down to you fantastic people for helping us. I went to collect my children and just hugged them all, I know it sounds a bit Hollywood but the relief of knowing we can stay in our home and the kids won't have to deal with all of this feels amazing.

 

So next battle is to get the mortgage company to refund us all the insurance premiums and I am going after them for all those charges.

 

To anyone going through this, the Caggers are right, I think a judge will try and keep you in your home if he possibly can

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent result - well done ! :)

 

Thanks for posting your account of how the hearing went, I am sure it will be a great help and give some reassurance to others in the same position.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent result - well done ! :)

 

Thanks for posting your account of how the hearing went, I am sure it will be a great help and give some reassurance to others in the same position.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's thanks to you for all your help and support. I feel like a different person today and know that reading how others managed helped me, so thought I would update and help others where I can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's thanks to you for all your help and support. I feel like a different person today and know that reading how others managed helped me, so thought I would update and help others where I can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done for following this through, an excellent result. . . :-)

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right

 

The mortgage company have seen my insurance paperwork at last and have confirmed I had cover the whole time they have sent me a letter today saying that they will refund me an amount but it is £243 less than all the premiums they have actually charged me. So I need to write to them I imagined and query this, but I have one question. Can I ask for the refund to include the difference plus the interest on the amounts ie the 8%?

 

Also there are charges going back the past year or so, they have also said in the letter they normally charge a £35 for every month you are in arrears BUT won't charge it if I stick to my payment plan (which I will barring something unforeseen of course!) so again a couple of questions. Do I dare go after the current company or is that risking their wrath and if I go for it, I guess its the SAR route again?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The insurance money paid to them should be returned in full plus 8% interest on top. The £35 pounds is excessive and added to the account automatically, it is a penaltyfor being in arrears. Excessive fees.One of the clearest examples, the FSA says, is where the charge is higher than the administrative cost to the lender. If it costs £10 to send a letter but the charge is £35, that's £25 too much.

 

The Ombudsman says you can reclaim fees from as far back as you like, as long as you make the complaint within three years of realising you could. As the FSA has only got tough over the past few months, most people will still be within that three-year time-frame. You can make a request to get a list of fees charged from your lender over the past under the Data Protection Act. This will cost up to £10. First complain to your lender setting out why the charges are unfair and ask for your money back. If you are turned away or do not get a satisfactory response within eight weeks, then complain to the free Ombudsman service. Get those charges back, remember they tried to evict you, take no prisoners with this lot from now on.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi

I am with Engage credit for my mortgage and have received my annual statement today and am a bit baffled. I was in arrears originally about a year ago but have almost completely cleared them now.

So that's the good news. However there is a fees balance on there which is going up and I will have to contact them about it but want to have my facts straight first. I am being charged additional interest every month which I am guessing is for being in arrears? So in the amounts added to the balance of the loan column it shows the monthly interest charge and also the additional interest charged. In the amounts reducing the loan is my monthly payment, however this isn't for the payment plus additional interest, it's just the normal payment plus my arrears amount. So I am not being asked to pay the additional interest it's just being added to the loan every month. Is this right?

Also the payment expected and the amount I am being asked to pay is varying by about £3-4ish a month. What would that be for?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. I am looking at my annual statement for my Engage Credit mortgage and can't make sense of it!

 

Every month I pay what I'm told to pay plus an amount off of my arrears (which I've nearly cleared)

but that is always different from the instalment expected according to the statement.

 

For instance in a month I was asked to pay £879.27, the instalment due amount says £892.18.

 

What concerns me is in the statements 'amounts added to the balance of the loan column

it shows interest charge for the month and then also an 'additional interest charged' of around £30.

 

I am not being asked to pay this amount each month but it is being added to my loan balance and shows as part of the fees balance each month.

 

Is this right?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

all PENALTY fees can be reclaimed.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition to the fees I can try and reclaim,

can anyone explain why I am being asked to pay one amount (and do pay it) and yet the instalment due on their statement is actually higher every single month.

 

This has probably added around £330 to my arrears balance over the past few months.

 

Should their buildings insurance premiums be included in their arrears balance?

 

I know I got a partially refund of these,

I will have to ask for a further reduction as they didn't refund me two months worth

but shouldn't they only be going on the account balance NOT the arrears balance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they charged you building ins when you

ALREADY HAD IT.

 

they thats a total mis sale

 

can you scan up the statements please

 

can the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

'

BUT......

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc. barcodes etc using paint program

but leave all figures and dates. {DO NOT USE A BIRO OR PEN]

convert existing PC files to PDF [office has an installable print to PDF option]

..

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites [http://docupub.com/pdfconvert/]

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

try and logically name your file so people know what it is.

i'e Default notice dd-mm-yyyy

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify. I kept phoning to tell them I didn't need it as I was already covered. I then sent them several copies of my policy and this year after seven months of being charged it they stopped charging and refunded me 5 months worth. I am now sending a copy of the previous policy to claim back those two months which I hope they will do. However this is happening every year and in the past I know I haven't been fully refunded.

I was also charged a insurance lapse fee at one point!

 

There is a fees balance too which includes solicitors costs but also monthly arrears fees of £35pm at various times and £55 monthly litigation fee at times.

 

This balance is going up by around £25 per month due to interest? But on each months statement breakdown I am seeing

Interest charge (monthly payment)

Additional interest charged (the amount roughly being added to the fees)

Then instalment due underneath. This instalment due should surely be the same as the interest charged amount? But it isn't. It's always more. I have queried it now with two staff members who fudged and seemed as baffled as me, the first said "oh that because you are being charged interest on the additional borrowing" (ie the arrears and fees) but the second person couldn't give me any explanation at all!

 

Am I being charged twice then for the same interest?

 

Also they've asked me to put the query in writing and enclose a photocopy of the mortgage statement. I find it dubious they would need that when it came from them originally?

Link to post
Share on other sites

go back to day one when they charged you buildings ins

 

enter every payment you made in this sheet:

 

This fourth spreadsheet is useful in calculating a regulatory based compound interest award for PPI on a Revolving Credit Account. Not all statements are required for this sheet because it will work out the compound interest on the PPI payments you do know about. It will not work out the additional 8% interest, to do that you will need spreadsheet three above AND all of your statements.

 

FosCISheet v101.xls

 

 

and put in the extra int too associated with these or ANY fees

 

put the fees in too [arrears fees] & monthly lit fees

 

then from the total deduct and refunds they have given.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi

 

Usual Engage complaint. We got into mortgage arrears awhile ago for various reasons since resolved. They rushed us off to court, the Judge took a dim view of them trying to repossess us as we had young children and could prove we could now offer to pay the whole payment every month plus gradually clear the arrears.

 

We offered to pay £275 additionally per month but the Judge said he felt we were offering more than was comfortable so said he preferred £225 per month. We have been paying that faithfully for the past 14 months.

 

Last Friday I called to make my monthly payment and got a nosey jobsworth (I swear they keep you ages on the phone anyway so that they can rack up the call charges) who said the arrangement was up for review. Hmmm thats odd I thought, there had been no mention of this at any point and why do it at 14 months and not 12 or 18?

 

She said I would have to complete a new income and expenditure form, which I am not inclined to do. She said it was to see if I could start paying more each month to clear them sooner. As we are already keeping up on the plan, I can't see that I need to entertain them. She said it was because we seem to have income free every month. With young children? Yeah right I wish!

 

So I said I found it odd because the Judge had looked at our case at the time and he had decided the amount per month and I was sticking to that. She seemed to back down a little bit then.

 

However could I have some advice please? Can they force me to supply a new I&E form? I'm not afraid to as nothing has changed I would just prefer not to as I don't trust them. Neither do I really fancy going back to court.

 

The situation is that the arrears will be cleared before the end of the year anyway so why are they making a fuss with probably 5 months left to go? Is this part of a bigger picture? We are on interest only with them at the moment, should I be worried they are up to something there too?

 

In addition to the interest they charge me every month on the mortgage they are also charging me about £26 per month additional interest on the arrears and fees balance, is that right?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...