Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Engage Trying to evict me- Help+ lots of Fees to get back ! EVICTION STOPPED


Pupter
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3328 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Sometime ago you all helped me get a suspended possession order. When I went to court the Judge looked through our finances and said what I was offering per month was a little too generous so he fixed a figure of CMI plus £170 per month.

 

We have been paying this faithfully ever since and have never missed a single payment if CMI or arrears amount. The mortgage company have been absolutely fine until end of last month when I went to pay my mortgage. Suddenly I was told my agreement had come to an end and they were looking at us to increase our payments to clear the arrears sooner. I said nothing has changed I cannot pay any extra. The person said I would have to fill in new I&E forms and they would review it.

I have now received what I would call a threat-o-gram. In it they state fill in the forms and return with supporting evidence within five business days or "we will expect a payment to clear the remaining arrears within 5 working days"

 

They then mention about me incurring a fee for every month I'm in arrears, well we haven't been charged one all this time, but it does add "Where a performing arrangement fee is in place we will waive this fee"

 

Can they do this? Surely the arrangement, as put in place by the judge, stands until and unless I either clear the arrears or I default on payments?

 

Can they suddenly demand more if the Judge set the figures as per our I&E which hasn't significantly changed?

 

I must add the arrears are due to be cleared completely within the next 5 months so this seems a bit daft to start fussing about it now. But what should I do!

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 175
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm sure Lea or Ell-enn will help you here, but they generally come on later in the day.

 

If you have a Court Order it is not up to them to change it, unless the Judge stated that there could be a review after a specific time period, but from what you say the Judge would have worked out that the arrears would all be paid off in the period due to end in five months' time?

 

I'll make sure Ell-enn or Lea sees your thread later.

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure Lea or Ell-enn will help you here, but they generally come on later in the day.

 

If you have a Court Order it is not up to them to change it, unless the Judge stated that there could be a review after a specific time period, but from what you say the Judge would have worked out that the arrears would all be paid off in the period due to end in five months' time?

 

I'll make sure Ell-enn or Lea sees your thread later.

 

DD

 

Thank you, as far as I remember there was no review on it and the first I heard there would be was when I phoned to make my payment, it was almost has if they though 'oh this person has been paying without problems,we can't have that' and decided to fiddle around with it. I am confident that having paid it for so long without problems we will make the final 5 no problems, so what are they trying to do? Grab my house now before they lose their chance AND they aren't exactly playing fair Re they, only giving me 5 working days to write and send them an I&E or pay the full arrears?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the arrears outstanding are £850 and you've paid as the judge ordered. Of course they would love to grab your house, which is why they are stirring things up now. As Lea said on another thread recently, you won't lose your house for that amount of money, especially as you've been paying as agreed.

 

Wait to see how she or Ell-enn suggest you should reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Daniella is spot on: they're not in a position to think they can usurp a court order. Bad form on them for trying to even suggest that to you.

 

Write to them - inform them that there is a court order in force allowing you to pay CMI plus £170 per month towards the arrears and that if they wish to vary this court order, that they will need to return to court and ask the judge to vary it. Tell them that they are not in a position to do this unilaterally and that you take their attempt at misleading you into believing that they have this power as unfair and will report any further such attempts to the relevant financial ombudsman. Tell them to treat the letter that you write as an official complaint which requires a response within 14 days from the date of the letter and that you will reclaim any charges they illegally add to your account as once a court order is in place they are not at liberty to add charges unless the order is broken (which it has not been).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, and try not to worry - you've done well keeping to the court order, so even if there was a blip now with a missed payment, the court would take into account your excellent attempts at reducing the arrears, rather than pay too much attention to the fact that you've had a minor blip.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason we got behind originally was because we had both within the space of something like two months been forced onto reduced hours at work on a temporary basis. We always made clear that it was short term due to the needs of our work in the tough financial times. But we paid the CMI and arrears then and haven't missed a payment ever since. So we have proved it was a short term problem and we're ok but £170 is a lot to find each month so I can't really afford more than that, even though I'd be happier to clear the arrears even quicker.

 

Quite bizarre, to me there must be people far easier to chase than us!

 

So I should write to them within the 5 working days they mention just to be safe and state the above? Thanks, I will get onto it right away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are definitely safe...don't worry, they can't do a thing without the agreement of the court and on the facts as you presented them, they simply won't be able to persaude a court that you should pay more, or that they be allowed to execute the warrant.

 

Yes, write to them.. No reason to be courteous and give the standard 14 days for a response since they haven't bothered to allow you even a week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. It is worrying to receive a letter like this, especially when we have been vigilant in paying every month since we got back on track. The end was in sight of all the arrears business until this letter arrived. Makes me wonder what their next attempt will be!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a phone call from them. No mention of their letter, they said they just wanted to check all out details are the same. So they are sending it off to the team to confirm our arrangement is still in place...er...it's a court supported judgement so how can the mortgage company not agree to it?

 

Then he asked me if we had ever tried to sell or were planning to sell in the future. Why suddenly mention this? What are they planning by asking this? We're they trying to see if I'd say, "no but it would be easy to sell" and then they would try and evict me. I don't know what to think now.

 

Do they think their threat-o-gram didn't work so they will try a different tactic?

 

Any thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi,

 

Please can someone just confirm whether a mortgage company can add anything to the arrears balance other than actual arrears?

 

I was in arrears (now cleared) so had to additional balance amounts other than the main mortgage account, one fees balance and one arrears balance.

 

Each month I was paying off the arrears then suddenly the balance was going up each month slightly. It seems even though I have my own buildings insurance they were charging me for their own version. As I refused to pay for this insurance when I made my monthly payments and arrears payment they decided to add it to my arrears balance. Is this legal?

I have sent them several documents proving I have the insurance which they were happy to accept last year. Are they in the right!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apart from the fact you cannot be insured for the same risk twice, if you have sent proof of cover they should not continue adding the charges.

 

I suggest a Formal Complaint Letter to director level of the mortgage provider, this must be properly investigated and responded to within 56 days.

 

Use recorded signed for post check date delivered, Do Not use an address with a PO Box Number.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apart from the fact you cannot be insured for the same risk twice, if you have sent proof of cover they should not continue adding the charges.

 

I suggest a Formal Complaint Letter to director level of the mortgage provider, this must be properly investigated and responded to within 56 days.

 

Use recorded signed for post check date delivered, Do Not use an address with a PO Box Number.

Thank you, I was sure this couldn't be right. Plus they are charging me £51pm for just buildings cover. I'm getting insurance including contents and accidental cover for half that! Greedy, grasping idiots! I'll take your advice and get writing. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

put in a claim for the excess buildings insurance

 

and don't forget at THEIR int rate too.

 

and if they've added any PENALTY [arrears/letter/late/phone call] fees

get them back too!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can we guess who this is please ?

 

I think I already know/

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah so its ben sold on

 

engage buy mortgages that have had problems or firms books that have closed.

 

who was the original with?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

put in a claim for the excess buildings insurance

 

and don't forget at THEIR int rate too.

 

and if they've added any PENALTY [arrears/letter/late/phone call] fees

get them back too!

 

dx

The premiums have just sat there while the arrears were being cleared.

 

Each month I paid the amount I agreed with the SPO to clear the arrears

but they were using £51 of that each month to pay off these premiums,

which I don't think can be right.

 

So could I actually claim any interest back or just a refund?

 

Another question actually now I think of it. Now the arrears are cleared do I need to do anything/should they do something to show the arrears are cleared? I mean does this mean the Suspended Possession Order is now voided and do I need to get proof of that so they can't ever try anything in the future?

I don't foresee any future problems as this was from a time when we were both on reduced salaries. I am so pleased we are arrears free at last.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes of course you can claim back the payments at their int rate.

 

I bet they've levied it on you.

 

CISheet v101.xls

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I am resurrecting this thread because I have been looking at all my old statements today and

 

 

it definitely shows their buildings insurance premiums being added every month (which I refused to pay)

 

 

so they kept adding them to the arrears balance.

 

 

The refunds were made but sometimes months and months later, so I would imagine I was charged interest in the interim.

 

Additionally, when we had some financial difficulties a few years ago, this lot were charging us a lot of arrears admin fees etc.

It got to the point of litigation.

 

 

Up until then the statements show one debit each month for the interest charge (it is an interest only mortgage)

but after the solicitor costs went onto the account things changed.

 

 

Since then it shows interest charge for each month and then underneath that 'Additional interest charge' of around £35 - 40 every month.

 

 

Our account was in arrears for months before hand and no additional interest charge appears,

then suddenly post the court case, additional interest is now a separate charge,

which gradually reduced as the arrears did (now long since cleared completely)

There is still a fee balance of the account but no arrears anymore.

 

What is that additional interest thing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

int on the arrears and penalty charges and sols fees

 

 

they cannot do that.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

int on the arrears and penalty charges and sols fees

 

 

they cannot do that.

 

 

dx

Well every month it's there for a year or more. Averaging around £35 pm. When they refunded me some of the buildings insurance premiums this came off the arrears balance. But I didn't think it should have ever been added to the arrears balance in the first place?

 

So would these amounts be claim able too? I'm sorry to ask but I find this all very confusing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...