Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance Default


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4575 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I'm new on here and was looking for some help regarding Welcome Finance. I'm trying to sort out my husbands finances (as he's no good at this sort of thing!) and after recently checking his credit report, noticed that Welcome Finance had defaulted both of his accounts on 31/3/08 (HP and personal loan, opened in 2002).

 

He never used to be great with his finances (before he met his nagging wife!) and there were a few missed payments at the beginning of the agreements (numerous default/conversion fees were added to his account?!) but from looking at statements, all was sorted out at the beginning of 2005 and since then has been making payments by direct debit every month.

 

Neither of us recall ever receiving the default notices (for which he has written to them requesting copies) although I do vaguely remember them contacting him a while ago (possibly back in 2008) to tell him he wasn't paying enough every month. Could this be the reason for the defaults? The payments he was making from 2005 were in fact lower than what he had been paying at the beginning but surely as he was paying by DD, Welcome Finance would be controlling them? Both accounts are now fully paid off.

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

 

Thanks

Nikki

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Have you submitted a Subject Access Request yet? If not then this is the first step.

˙os op oʇ pǝʞsɐ ssǝlun ǝƃɐssǝɯ ǝʇɐʌıɹd ʎq ǝɯ ʇɔɐʇuoɔ ʇou op ǝsɐǝlԀ ˙pǝɹnɔɔo sǝssol ʎuɐ ɹo ǝɹnlıɐɟ ɟo ʇlnsǝɹ ɐ sɐ ǝlqɐıl plǝɥ ǝq ʇou llɐɥs I ˙llıʍpooƃ ɟo ǝɹnʇsǝƃ ɐ sɐ os ǝuop sı uǝʌıƃ ǝɔıʌpɐ ʎu∀

Link to post
Share on other sites

the 'default 8' status is prob down to the cra system itself

after a creditor marks a file with about 6-8 'markers' [late/no/under] payments

the system automatically marks it '8' - default

 

that could be the answer here i suspect.

 

now as has been advised, you need all the statements via an sar

 

once you've got that

 

me thinks he's in for a reclaiming winfall

 

welcome are renound for adding unlawful charges for every reason under the sum

 

late/letter/phone/cats died etc etc

 

so once reclaimed, it might well be possible to get these markers and thus the default removed, if it can be proved, they were solely due to their fees.

 

don't forget insurances like PPI etc etc

 

you can get these reclaimed too!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your responses, much appreciated.

 

He did submit a SAR request, asking for copies of agreements, full statements and copies of default notices. They have recently replied enclosing the agreement for one of the accounts (which has a very small balance which will be settled with next months DD) but said regarding the other agreement (which is fully paid off):

 

"there is no copy of agreement XXX available due to the account being closed" (??!!)

 

They also said that statement of account(s) has been requested and follow separately, but no mention of copies of default notices.

 

A couple of things don't seem quite right here:

 

1. Surely they still should provide agreement copies even if the account is paid off?

2. On the agreement they did provide, should this be a copy of the original signed version? As the one they have sent has no date or signature and also has our current address on it...we didn't live at this address when the account was originally opened in 2002.

 

Referring to your comment on reclaiming windfall for fees, how will we know if they are unlawful?? They seem to all just have 'default/conversion fee' as the description (looking at previous statements)

 

Also I don't see how his later default (in 2008) could be due to fees? All the fees are near the beginning of the agreement, and his DD amount dropped later on (in 2005) which I'm guessing is the reason for the 'default 8' status as you describe above. Would he be right in saying to them that, as this lower monthly amount was a DD, it was then obviously setup by them so therefore how can they default the account for not paying enough?

 

Sorry for the length of this and probably my naivety!

 

Thanks very much!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, A couple of points the creditor is no obliged to

supply a copy of the agreement (s) with a SAR which

is a DATA PROTECTION ACT matter, the agreement

it's format and regulation is covered by the CONSUMER

CREDIT ACT 1974/2006, a CCA request cost £1 and

is sent to the last company to contact you.

The agreement supplied is not compliant, and is

not even a good attempt at a reconstruction.

 

I suggest you now send the account in dispute

letter from the CAG library and a CCA request with

a £1 payment for each signed and executed agreement,

I'd send it RD so you can trace delivery, they have 12+2 days to

respond.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply Brigadier2JCS.

 

He did in fact originally send a CCA request with £1 fee for each account so the agreement they have sent is not compliant...

 

He also requested true copies of the default notices (with a 28 day deadline) which was not mentioned atall in the previous letter, and they are now over the deadline.

 

Can I just also just confirm that, even if one of the accounts has been closed as it is fully paid off, they still have to provide a copy of the original agreement with a CCA request?

 

Basically, all we want is to try and get these defaults removed. Now that they have failed to comply with the CCA request and also failed to supply default notices within the timeframe, do we have a chance??

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, you can ask for the CCA at any time,

but please don't rely on a non compliance

on a CCA request to remove defaults before

the six years is up it rarely is that easy.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks guys, if only it was that easy!

 

Both accounts are actually now fully paid off. Yes his payments were below the agreed amount for a period of time a while back (which he then increased at a later date - I do remember them turning up at the door to tell him he wasnt paying enough) but we dont recall ever receiving default notices.

 

And also, the lower payments were paid by DD so surely WF would have set them up? Its a long time ago so we're struggling to recall what happened, and cant find any paperwork. Am I right in thinking that if he submitted an SAR request with £10 for each accounts, they have to provide full information on the accounts, commuincation, notes, fees etc etc? Would that be the next step?

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion yes, if you do

the SAR to Welcome ensure you

make it clear that the £10.00 fee

is just that and not a payment to

the account.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default is about correctly reporting the management of the account (irrespective as to whether a DN was sent by the provider or not). If this is accurate it is highly unlikley that they will be removed. The issue of claiming back charges is sompletely separate unless the account holder would not have defaulted if the charges hardn't been applied. Even then it will be a long and difficult battle!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The accounts are closed, the DN is now not relevant,

the task is to get the default removed and to get all the data

on the accounts for charges and PPI.

Nikki send the SAR off addressed to the compliance manager,

together with a ''polite'' enquiry as to if the would remove the deafult

as the accounts are clear and closed.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Thank you all for your help so far on this.

 

So an SAR request was sent off and we have just received back the info. Just as we thought, NO default notices in there, so I assume this puts us in a much better position to get them removed? There are also some letters in there dated the 11th October 2011 (ie the date they did the SAR)?! It makes me think they are trying to forge them, but they are only settlement advices (definitely not default notices) and letters put through the door when they've visited and we weren't in, so I'm not sure what they would be hoping to gain by doing this.

 

With regards to the fees on the accounts, how do I go about trying to reclaim these? As I'm not sure how to work out which ones are unlawful.

 

Thanks again

Nikki

Link to post
Share on other sites

H Nikki,

Yes it should be much easier to get

the defaults removed.

As to reclaiming, have a read

through some of the threads on the

subject I'm sure you'll find all you

need, sorry I cant post links at present

as I am reduced to newbie status as

my e-mail was hacked.

Brig.

BRIGADIER2JCS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I am sorry to jump on your thread but i have a similar problem and have been trying to get copies of my statements from Welcome Finance. I have sent off 2 SAR requests and both times they have sent documents back with a letter saying statements will follow after. I rang their head office and have it documented with who i spoke to, what time, date etc (it was 1 month ago) asking for copies of my statements and explaining that i had sent to SAR letters off and i was told they would take 'around 2 weeks'...still no statements. Is there anything else i can do to get these or dispute the account.. Thank you (sorry again for jumping on).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...