Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you to you all, you guys are amazing!! Yes of course i will be making a donation, i am very grateful to you all. Keep up the good work
    • I'm not quite out of the woods yet. The email they sent me also said that I have £290 of arrears and it has been passed onto their collections department. If anything my account should be £10 in credit.  They haven't taken into account the trainers that were returned back in October. The other items have been credited to my account so it looks like I've still got work to do.  They are not very quick to reply to emails, although I've only sent one trying to find more information, and I have no idea what happens next. Half of me want's to get it sorted properly the other half just wants it over with, if that means a default then so be it. 
    • No. It's a public (council maintained) road with some houses in it.   Some other houses back onto it too and those owners have right of way down the road to access the back of their properties.  Theres a few garages with private osp - so one drives out the garage, over the osp, and onto the public side road and then out on to the public main road.  Irrespective of whether the garages are used - the local businesses parking their cars on the private osp are ostensibly preventing cars from accessing the public roads.
    • is the side street solely for access to your garages? who owns the land and thus the road? dx  
    • A local business has been parking on an off-street parking space in front of my garages (in a side street).  I wasn't using them for a while so didnt bother to do anything.  But now a second local business is also using the osp - taking it in turns with the 1st biz.  This has started to nark me.    The employees choose to drive to work.  There is no private parking in their business's street.  But there are some underground secure garages in their street - which cost apx £2.4k/y to rent - which works out apx £6.60/d. (I believe one of the biz owners already rent one for storage purposes).  If the employee had to park on a meter it would cost them £6.60/h - £66 for 10h and have to move every 4h.  They just don't want to pay for parking. I haven't confronted either of them.  Instead I just put 2 clear "no parking" signs in front of the garages. And a note on one of the cars specifically saying that as they don't live or rent in the street and it's private land could they stop parking.   They ignored that.  And just put notes on their dash with a # to call if one needs the car moved.  There is a sign and they've been told in writing to stop parking. And they are just ignoring it.    I don't what a confrontation.    I don't want to go to the expense of bollards (other than maybe traffic plastic ones - but they'll probs just move them).  Council won't do zilch cos it's private land. And police won't get involved - unless I clamp/ tow the cars and then they'd be after me, not the drivers!    What's the best thing to do?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA new claim question?


ancojo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4701 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

We had the phone call from the ESA department and now await the form to fill in.

 

I am a carer for my partner, she currently receives DLA MRC and HRM, she also claims IS for us as a family including our 7 year old child, from what i can gather its the disabilty side of IS which is the reason for DWP contacting her about changing her to ESA?

 

She has suffered from arthritis for 6 years now and also has Diabetes type 1 (Injects twice dailly) She is on numerous drugs and is constantly tired due to this. After reading up on ESA on the net she is worried that they will find her "Fit" for work as there seems to be people with serious health issues that are being forced into looking for work! No surprise there then! Some of the decision making i have read is amazingly bad!

 

After reading the teletext today it seems most are "Fit" for work! 1.3 million people tested since 2008 yet 1.22 million are fit to work! So basicaly the majority of disabled claimants are cheats! (In thier eyes) I gather most of these will be put onto the work related part of ESA if not JSA, but even this is an issue for me, my partner wont be going to no meeting to help her to find work even if it is only once per month!

 

There is no way she can go back to work, the arthritis is in her hands and feet and also affects her shoulders, her right hand is curling in and her feet ache all the time, yes she can walk but pain is there and if she walks to far then the pain obviously gets worse even when she sits down! She cant use a walking stick/aid due to her hands being sore if she does for to long so its catch 22, "Shes supposed to have bad feet but doesnt use a walking stick!" She has been on Humira for about a year and that has been quite good for her but shes got realy thin hair due to the methotrexate which she gets paranoid about!

 

I'm rambling now but i'm just trying to explain the situation.

 

Ok so back to my question, if they do decide she can sit at a desk and use a computer with one hand (Sarcasm) will they force her to go to the job centre or can i take over that role? As I'm her carer I could get a part time job but thats the issue, she needs me at home!

 

Any advice on how this all works or just general advice would be very much appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

ancojo

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is useful information in the 'stickies'. If you come out of this thread and scroll to the top of the benefit subforum, you will see a section highlighted in a horrible green colour. Click on sticky: esa medicals for information on how an ESA medical works.

 

In regard to her attending the Jobcentre, she would have to attend for any appointments made at the jobcentre. You can of course, go with her but you cannot go in her place.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply

 

The job centre interview is my main issue as she cannot work wereas i can aslong as i dont need to care for her (Which i do!) I used to be a carpenter/joiner but had to quit to take care of her, i would rather be earning £500+ per week than £55.55! Why dont i go back to it? Simply because neither she or i will accept that someone else should take care of her, i'm her partner its my duty to do so.

 

Is there not a way of arranging or reclaiming IS were i am the main claimer not her so that they look at me and not her? I just dont understand how if some doctor assessing her can say "Yep you can do work in certain areas" means she has to go to interviews that will be a total waste of time just because he/she thinks they may be some sort of job she can do!

 

Its so stupid that one department of government can say she is entitled to care (DLA) and another can say she can go to work! It just doesnt add up!

 

I'm assuming this may happen and to be honest it may turn out that they dont do any of the above, these feelings are due to reading so many people being forced into appeals because of IMO and many others, stupid and incorrect decisions! Its not the first time the powers that be have done this!

 

I suppose we will fill the form in and wait to see what the decision is.

 

One question, what chances are there that they will bypass a medical examination due to the form data we provide? Or is the medical exam almost certainly going to happen no matter what?

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm really rusty on this, but couldn't you claim income support as a carer and your wife come of of incapacity before the switchover Maybe Erika could confirm if that's still a possibility.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DLA and ESA are two different benefits. Having care and /or mobility needs doesn't always stop you from working.

 

Some people won't get a medical. I do know someone who isn't in the exempt groups and managed to pass (or would that be fail?) on the basis of her ESA50.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...