Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays acknowledge claim so now what!!!


Hayley Hill
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6297 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Having been inspired by various articles in the press and, of course, this great website I have taken the path of no return.

I have gone through the various stages - sending the letter to the bank, getting an offer of half the money back, rejecting it as full and final settlement etc, etc and today - having received another letter from Barclays saying that I should have taken their offer because now I'll have to take them to court - I have done exactly that!

So, I have submitted my money claim form to the court, paid my £120 fee, and now wait, nervously, to find out what will happen next! Fingers crossed - I shall keep you posted.:confused:

edit.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi there

 

I have looked at various messages from other members and kind of know the answer but need a bit of reassurance!

 

Having got to the money claim online stage (i.e. potentially taking Barclays to court!!! v. scary!!!) I was under the impression that it would be settled within 14 days. Today is the deadline but, having tracked my claim online, I now see that Barclays have acknowledged my claim!!

 

Does this mean that they now have a further 14 days to sit on this? Do I need to take any action or do I just wait for this further period to lapse? Are there lots of other people who have got this far i.e. is this quite a standard thing that Barclays like to do to hold on to our money just that little bit longer?

 

Any advice or comments gratefully received.

 

H x :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, first, can you please not start a new thread every time you have a question or update, or we'll never be able to follow as things develop. I have merged your threads, from now on, please post on here, ok? Thanks.

 

If you were under the impression that your claim would be settled within 14 days, I am sorry to say you have a lot more reading to do.

 

Barclays in particular are absolute swines when it comes to holding things up, and they have never ever settled straight away. It is only in the last couple of months that we have seen the conclusion of Barclays cases that got started in the spring. I started mine in April and am still waiting.

 

Yes, they have acknowledged, they always do. They now have 28 days to enter a defence, and they will do so on the 28th day, if they run true to form.

 

Have a read of Icefall's thread, Twinkle's thread, mine, and others where you see there's lots of posts, it will give you an indication of how Barclays play.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

Thanks for your comments and sorry about the whole 'thread' thing. Bit new to all this and didn't understand how it worked.

 

Having read icefall's experiences I am even more determined to see this through to the end. I have brought myself up to speed with how the process works and feel a lot more prepared. So, Barclays, Bring it on!!! I'm ready for you.

 

Thank you for your support and I shall keep you posted (without starting a new thread!!!!)

 

Barclays - we are coming for you!!!!!!!!!!!!! :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes thats the spirit......keep at em !:)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi there

Not sure whether I am doing this right - am totally confused by the whole 'thread' thing but hopefully this will appear in the same section so you can see my history. Anyway, have today received a letter from the court saying that Barclays have filed a defence and I have to complete an allocation questionnaire on or before 23rd October and pay a further £100 court fee.

Any advice please on how I proceed now?

Obviously having come this far I am committed to seeing this through to the end but just need a little encouragement as the defence that Barclays is legal jargon that I don't really understand!!

Help and advice from anyone gratefully received!! !:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hayley.

 

Take a look here and read that thread from post #33 onward to give you an idea of what others have done. Then go along to here which gives you guidance to filling the AQ. Finally, I have seen many posts from claimants asking what on earth to put in section G in the AQ. The following has been the the text claimants have been putting there:

 

"I would respectfully ask that the court in this case, not withstanding allocation to the small claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in the courts discretion to do so. I believe such an order would bring a rapid end to this litigation."

 

Hope that helps you and Good Luck.

To follow my case progress, click here to see where I'm at right now.

 

Welshman

Link to post
Share on other sites

this will all fit if you write it small enough

 

I am respectfully requesting that my claim be allocated to the small claims track. This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the Defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their actual costs and I am surprised the Defendant did not counterclaim for these, because I would have paid them without argument.

 

However, the continuing problem is (in common with the 100s of other cases currently being brought by other bank customers) that the banks refuse to reveal the details of their penalty-charging regime. As the banks have a fiduciary duty towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly and in utmost good faith.

 

Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that the court in this case, not withstanding allocation to the small claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in the courts discretion to do so. I believe this would bring a rapid end to this litigation

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello scary isn't it.You are one step ahead of me.They offered me part payment which i was tempted to take but now im posting my letter before action.Out of interest do you get the first offer and then take them to court for the rest?Good luck but i wont know how to find you again thats what worries me its a bit confusing!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that you have responded to this thread, you will get an e.mail when anyone contributes to it so you'll not lose it.

 

By rejecting their offer using the template letter, they will tell you that they won't play ball. It's a full and final settlement - all or nothing, so you file for the lot in MCOL or your local County Court.

 

Good Luck

To follow my case progress, click here to see where I'm at right now.

 

Welshman

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

Thanks for your helpful advice - have now read all the relevant threads and have completed the questionnaire form I received from my local court.

 

Your advice and guidance has been absolutely brilliant - there is no way I could have got this far (or to be honest would have stuck with it for so long) without this site and I shall definitely donate some money if I ever reach the end of this journey!

 

I am off to Southend now to deliver my questionnaire. Will keep you posted.

 

If anyone is reading this thread my only advice would be, DON'T GIVE UP!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Its so good to read about someone going through the same worries and doubts and being reassured. I am waiting for notification from the court to see what happens next. Ill keep an eye on this thread. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Please help!

Yesterday I received a "general form of judgement or order" from my local court.

It says that the claim is to be stayed until 13 december. The matter will then be referred to a judge in paperwork on that date.

Have I missed something crucial??

Should I have taken action on this - I filled out the questionnaire and posted it back well within the time period requested and I thought that was the right thing to do.

Does this mean that I should have taken further action and didn't so therefore I have messed up???

If anyone can offer some advice I would be very grateful.

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Others here have had their hearings 'stayed'. I don't think you have messed up.

 

This could be part of the court ptting claims against Barclays on to the same date - so they can all be dealt with at once.

 

If you cannot find enough information by searching through this forum, it may be worth ringing the court and asking what it means and what will happen next.

 

Spotty

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Statement request 4th May

Prelim Letter sent 24th May

LBA 7th June

Thanks but no thanks letter sent 22 June

MCOL 22nd June

Claim acknowledged 26 June

AQ sent 2nd August

17 Nov Court Date Set for 29 Jan 2007

Settled in full 12/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

received standard letter offering me half of money owed. Am just sending off letter to decline their offer. Im a little anxious that they will decline their first offer (Getting to the scarely bit now) but am datermined to see this all the way. Its Pay Back Time!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Having received a hearing date from Southend Court for next month I am preparing my paperwork. Have downloaded the brilliant 'basic court bundle' and put most of it together with correct page numbers etc. However, not being the most technically minded PC user in the world, I don't know if I have missed the last section: OFT Statement Summary. Can anyone let me know how long this section is and briefly what it is as it doesn't seem to be at the end of my bundle!!! Everything else on the template was very straightforward with the heading of each section appearing at the top of each page but I just can't see OFT Statement Summary?! Sorry to be so thick but so very nearly there now - any help gratefully received!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi hayley,

Here is the link for the OFT statement summary.

http://www.oft.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/DF19FDA9-1D31-4B18-B251-9BF5AF6A29D4/0/oft842a.pdf

Best of luck.

Claire

:pI'VE CLAIMED MY BARCLAYS CHARGES BACK.:p

£5125.60

Im no expert everything i write is what i learnt from my own experience and reading through other threads. Click my scales if you wish to!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Can anyone help me please.

I received a notice of allocation from the court giving me a hearing date and time. Unfortunately it is scheduled for when I am away on holiday (this is a Christmas present from my parents for all my family to go away together). I wrote a letter to the court manager explaining that I would be away on holiday on this date and would not be available. I explained that I started the claim in July 06 when I had no holidays scheduled and that this was an unexpected holiday given as a gift to me blah, blah, blah. I stated that I am in an impossible position as I have the opportunity of a holiday of a lifetime with my parents, sisters and their families etc but that I did not want to jeopardise my case against Barclays is this has been going on for over six months. I enclosed my supporting documentation / case bundle and asked that it would be at all possible to reschedule the hearing date given the circumstances.

Today I have received a letter from the court saying that my letter was put before the District Judge who made the following comments:

1. The hearing stands

2. Leave to claimant to appeal by letter.

I spoke to the court for an explanation of what procedure I now need to follow and what point 2 actually means but they could not advise me. They referred me to a government funded "Community Legal Services" helpline but they could not explain it either. They told me to take the letter to my local Citizens Advice Bureau.

Has anyone been in this position or can anyone help or advise me on what action I need to take. I go away on Friday and I am running out of time! My biggest concern is that having got so far from those early days back in July last year that I could potentially fall at the last fence which will be just devastating!!!! PLEASE HELP, ANYONE !!! URGENTLY!!!!!

Thank you.

Hayley aka Desperado!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Following on from my previous post, I have drafted a letter of response to the court. Does anyone have any feedback before I send it???

 

My response reads, as follows:

 

"I have received a letter dated 29th January from Mrs Sears of the Listing Section (copy attached for ease of reference) and would ask that this letter is placed before the District Judge at your earliest convenience.

 

I wish to respectfully appeal against the decision that the original hearing date stands. I enclose a copy of my airline tickets (for myself, my three children aged 9, 7 and 3 and all the other members of my family who are due to fly to Orlando, Florida this coming Saturday). As I mentioned in my previous letter dated 8th January, this is an ‘unexpected’ holiday with my whole family which was paid for by my parents as a Christmas present. When I originally started my claim, back in July 2006, I did not have any holiday scheduled and did not foresee any problems with making myself available for a hearing of the above case.

 

I am very keen to resolve the issue with Barclays, having spent a considerable amount of time in pursuing this matter. I have already prepared and submitted my supporting documentation for this case to the Court and to the Defendant. I can guarantee my availability for any other date after Monday 19th February that would suit your convenience for a rescheduled hearing date.

 

I do not want to jeopardise my case and would, again, respectfully ask that you reconsider your decision and reschedule the hearing date so that I may represent myself in my case against Barclays Bank. I hope that I have not been disrespectful in my wording but I am not too familiar with the etiquette of the law system and hope you will allow me some dispensation with the composition of my letter."

 

Any comments gratefully received!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you thought about phoning Barclays and asking if they wish to settle?

 

Have a read of page 9 in my thread to see how I did it.

 

If you DO decide to contact them, DO NOT tell them that you are going on holiday and would not be available to attend court.

 

Have your figures at the ready.

To follow my case progress, click here to see where I'm at right now.

 

Welshman

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hayley,

 

Welshman is so right. Thye don't need to know that you won't be about. They always try to settle beforehand. maybe that is what the Court sort of knows and why they have put that.

 

There is another thread just by yours from wigglywoo and they have listed points to think of when you make that call as well as Welshman's.

 

Good luck and let us know how you get on

Laineybelle

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...