Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lost tribunal today :(


subwoofer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4743 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I lost my DLA tribunal today

 

I have chronic arthritis in my hips and awaiting a hip replacement

 

i told them i could not take a single step without sever pain and had a report from my gp which stated i could not walk any distance at all without pain but they said this report was dated 16 days after the decision was made on my claim and that it would not be accepted because it was not related to the time of the claim! instead they choose to use evidence from a 2 year old esa medical which stated i could walk over 100 meter's!!

 

so a 2 year old medical is more relevant than a 2 week late one?

 

im totally gutted i cant think straight at the moment i dont know what to do!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sub

 

Welcome to CAG

 

The guys will be happy to advise as soon as they are available.

 

Its cleary not right, it seems like they wanted your claim to fail. It's disappointing, but I'm sure it can be fought.

Don't let them get you down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They basicaly said all of my evidence was after the original decision was made and therefore it was not to be accepted they said if were to re apply today i could use my current evidence but could not use it for this current claim. i did not sent any of my own evidence at 1st as i thought the dwp would ask my gp for it themselves as they ask in the claim form to give your gp's details but they didn't do this.

 

i arrived in a wheel chair and showed them my letter stating i was waiting for a hip replacement which is due to the same condition i applied for in the original claim but again they said it was dated after the original claim and not relevant

 

i can maby understand the letter which says im awaiting a hip replacement as it was dated 5 months after but the letter from my gp which states im in pain at all times when walking was only 16 days after the original decision surely that is more relevant than a esa report that was 12 months old at the time!

 

They also said that i should not need as much time to get in and out of the bed and bath as i stated in my claim form which was 30 minutes, i explained that this was because it is so painfull it takes several attemps to get in and our of bed i have to stop due to the pain then try again later and they said that if i had to stop due to pain and try again that the time i stopped shold not be counted as you are not reviving help in the time and that the time counted should start when you attempt the task again. i argued that i still needed somebody to wait with me before i attempted it again but they just moved onto the next questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear you lost.

 

The first step is to write to the tribunal service and ask for a statement of reasons - this can take several months. I don't know how they will logically justify using the older report, so this should give you grounds to request an appeal to the upper tribunal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I lost my ESA tribunal and the panel will not consider ANY evidence whatsoever if it is dated after the date of the initial claim. I suspect the law doesn't allow them too. I requsted a statement of reasons a day after my tribunal and then simply made a fresh claim for ESA the following day for the same conditions. Then the process begins all over again.

 

You must make a fresh claim (assuming the 6 month rule as been satisfied). I could have gone to the upper tribunal but then you don't get the ESA assessment rate while this is taking place so that wasn't an option and can only be instigated on a point of law..it's a long shot in my opinion

 

gl

 

SD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your tribunal is based on how you were at the time of the claim - any evidence dated after that is useless.

 

SD - there's no 6 month rule for DLA. You can make a new claim whilst appealing too. (I think I've misunderstood you!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your tribunal is based on how you were at the time of the claim - any evidence dated after that is useless.

 

SD - there's no 6 month rule for DLA. You can make a new claim whilst appealing too. (I think I've misunderstood you!)

 

Is this correct, there is no waiting period.

So if someone gets turned down for DLA they can immediatley apply again.

I was not aware of this.

Wouldnt this make the whole process go round and round for ever?

What would the point be of appealing then?

So if I was awarded mobility and not care, could I safely apply for the care element with out an appeal which could put my whole claim in danger of being changed for the worse.

Hope this makes sense, just taken a sleeping tablet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you can apply again. Your new claim must be based on what you're like now.

 

The point of appealing - if you don't appeal and just put in a new claim, your money will only be backdated to the date your new claim started. Appeal and the money is backdated to the date of that claim.

 

If you already receive DLA and put in a new claim, your current award would be in danger. However, that's not to say you'll lose your current DLA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you ,something to think about.

My husband was turned down after two years on high mob and care to zero but all the same illnesses plus deafness.

He tells doctor of his joint pains and gets prescribred painkillers and anti inflammatorie for 3 years.

He has hearing aids and needs help to cope.now has a letter from his gp backing him up, hes a cortezone, athroscopy, mri, physio, blood tests and xrays

He is waiting for a paper appeal as it will be quicker, he had a date of Nov for the oral tribunal.

He has pain, depression,iliteracy, anxiety, innsomsia .

He doesnt feel ready to face a tribunal face to face si I will let you know what happens, whenit happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I lost my ESA tribunal and the panel will not consider ANY evidence whatsoever if it is dated after the date of the initial claim. I suspect the law doesn't allow them too. I requsted a statement of reasons a day after my tribunal and then simply made a fresh claim for ESA the following day for the same conditions. Then the process begins all over again.

 

You must make a fresh claim (assuming the 6 month rule as been satisfied). I could have gone to the upper tribunal but then you don't get the ESA assessment rate while this is taking place so that wasn't an option and can only be instigated on a point of law..it's a long shot in my opinion

 

gl

 

SD

 

Not so. I've repped and won plenty of appeals where the evidence is post decision - the only thing that needs to be pointed out is that the evidence represented how you were at the time of the decision. What I'm guessing happened is they did the old 'how you were then, how you are now' confusion which leads in my experience to inevitable failure of the appeal. Admitting to deterioration without being incredibly clear in a written statement (submission) about when the deterioration occured only leads to confusion and failure.

 

Even so, with evidence 16 days after the decision, it will be very difficult to deny that this is representative of condition at the time of decision. As long as all evidence was presented well, and there were no contradictory statements on the record of proceedings, this is one that I would have been confident of arguing to an upper tribunal.

 

Forgot to say - also ask for a record of proceedings - it should be, but isn't always, included with the statement of reasons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you ,something to think about.

My husband was turned down after two years on high mob and care to zero but all the same illnesses plus deafness.

He tells doctor of his joint pains and gets prescribred painkillers and anti inflammatorie for 3 years.

He has hearing aids and needs help to cope.now has a letter from his gp backing him up, hes a cortezone, athroscopy, mri, physio, blood tests and xrays

He is waiting for a paper appeal as it will be quicker, he had a date of Nov for the oral tribunal.

He has pain, depression,iliteracy, anxiety, innsomsia .

He doesnt feel ready to face a tribunal face to face si I will let you know what happens, whenit happens.

 

Unfortunately paper DLA appeals are much more likely to fail as the tribunal members won't be able to ask questions - but if he's not up to it there is little else to be done. Just make sure that you write a submission (statement) putting your case forward and arguing against the DWP's reasons for refusing benefit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leemack,

Is it correct that he can reapply for DLA before his tribunal date with the same medical condition before 6 months of being turned down?

Thank you.

 

The medical condition doesn't matter, it's the needs that arise from it. So if needs have changed then you can apply ASAP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leemack,

Is it correct that he can reapply for DLA before his tribunal date with the same medical condition before 6 months of being turned down?

Thank you.

 

Yes he can reapply again, its not like ESA and doesn't have the same 6 month rule.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...