Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Unsure what would be classed as appeal I first contacted the applicant then IAS. I am not aware I could appeal again as Bank state I was informed that is news to me. I would have to look through the paper work, I apologise I forget so much due to my caring duties wish I had quality time to get so much done. Will try and look tomorrow, appreciate everyone's time and input.
    • Regular savings accounts are accounts designed for savers who put money aside every month and reward them with a generous interest rate.View the full article
    • Hi, I've been reading the invaluable advice on this forum and reading about the problems with Evri and lost delivery of items.  From what I gather the initial steps after having exhausted every's own lost item claim process is to draft a Letter of Claim, I think it is called and to register with the government Money Claims.  I have got a login for Money Claims and have made an initial stab at the letter but I'm not certain I have got it right. Am I right to assume that having exhausted Evri customer service's claims process and having received the denial of any compensation because the laptop I was sending is on the non-compensatory list that my next step would be to send the Letter of Claim to them? Let me provide some basic details which I hopefully have addressed in the letter. I purchased a laptop through Amazon.co.uk which a business in Belfast sold refurbished laptops through.  They had a 30 day money back guarantee for a full refund if you have any issues with the laptop.  I have the invoice from Amazon showing the purchase.  On 27 April, 2024 before the end of the 30 day period I used their ParcelShop (inside a Tesco) to send the laptop back and have the tracking reference mentioned in the letter.  As mentioned in the letter there was they advised they could not give me or sell me any insurance because laptops are on the non-compensatory list so I just paid the normal delivery cost.  It was scanned as leaving the ParcelShop on 29 April and the tracking has been like that ever since.  After a 28 working day Evri claim process they gave the expected response that they could not provide any compensation and simply could not proceed with my claim. I was hoping to get some advice on whether I go ahead now and email this to Customer Services straightaway and should I send a hard-copy to the Evri address as well?  Or are there any steps I have missed out on first?  I believe 14 days is the reasonable period of time for them to respond so if I were to send it tomorrow, for example 12 June then I should expect a reply by 26 June, is that correct and fair?  And assuming they don't reply with a full refund then I would then go down the government Money Claims site to proceed with that? Sorry for all the questions, I want to make sure I go about it properly.  I'll continue to read through other cases on here so I can get an even better handle on the process. I attached a LOC, happy for any edits or updates that will make it even better. Thanks so much for anyone's help! Regards, Matt Evri letter of claim.docx
    • The date was 3 June. Get on MCOL now. The legal principle is that, even if you defence is late, if the other party hasn't requested judgement, then your defence takes priority and is accepted. You might be in time. When I say now I mean now.  Recently we had someone who was nine days' late and this was pointed out to them at 5:30pm.  They faffed around till 11pm.  When they went on MCOl they saw that judgement had been entered at 7pm. Every minute is vital. File the below standard defence if you still can - 1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of [motor vehicle]. 2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.    4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.  6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
    • Hi friends,  I’m a bit worried I may have got confused with timings here. I thought I had 33 days from my acknowledgment to submit a defence but the date added above says 3/6/24.   have I missed the date?   if so how can I apply for an exception due to my disability and problems with deadlines and dates etc (ADHD)?   what should I submit as a defence?   I’ve had no reply from BW so far    just been back on MCOL and it says 28 days from service if I completed an acknowledgment of service so does that mean 28 days from that of acknowledgement (I.e. 16/5) which would make deadline for defence 14/6?   Thanks! Panicking here.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Premium numbers on phone bill


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4784 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was checking my online banking tonight and noticed that BT took 4 times the amount of the usual direct debit!! I very rarely use my phone and am always in credit with BT.

 

So I check my BT account online to find heaps of 09 numbers, each lasting about half a minute, several times a day. My bill has gone from £50 odd in credit to £120 odd in debit! Haven't been able to check all the numbers because the bloody BT billing service went down.

 

It's only me and the kids in the house, the only phone is in the living room so I'd know if they were using it, so it's not them, and it certainly isn't me that's done it. Some of the phone calls are early in morning when we are all in bed, some late in the evening when it's only me up.

 

How can this happen?

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

computer?

 

sky box?

 

games console?

 

++ unless they advised you of the increased DD - you can get it back under the DD guarantee

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was checking my online banking tonight and noticed that BT took 4 times the amount of the usual direct debit!! I very rarely use my phone and am always in credit with BT.

 

So I check my BT account online to find heaps of 09 numbers, each lasting about half a minute, several times a day. My bill has gone from £50 odd in credit to £120 odd in debit! Haven't been able to check all the numbers because the bloody BT billing service went down.

 

It's only me and the kids in the house, the only phone is in the living room so I'd know if they were using it, so it's not them, and it certainly isn't me that's done it. Some of the phone calls are early in morning when we are all in bed, some late in the evening when it's only me up.

 

How can this happen?

 

My parents had a similar situation, turns out as they were introducing the new fiber optic service, they messed around in the telephone exchange and plugged a different house into my parents phone number and vice versa. They phoned their own number and someone else answered! They ended up getting that months bills completely wiped. Maybe worth a try.

 

also search the number here or in google (use the CAG search box above!) to see who it is.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

The same thing happened to my friend - she got all the money back from BT as it wasn't them making the calls. I can't remember the whole story so I'll ask her. If you have any trouble getting satisfaction from BT send an email to:

[email protected] (CEO) you get a very quick response!

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can also contact your provider and get a ban on 09 numbers being made from your account :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a case in the West Country a few months ago of engineers having access to exchange boxes illegally calling the premium rate numbers of a certain premium rate provider adding profit to the companies account. The police, local press and BT were involved and all the subscribers who complained were refunded. It does make you wonder about those who just paid the bills without checking.

 

It was posted on several forums.

 

What were the PR numbers that are on your bill?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm furious. I contacted BT today to get a man who clearly was unwilling to listen to anything I had to say. He was insistant I had made those calls. I asked him to look over my account history and he'd see that in the 5 or so years I've used them, I've never dialled a PR number and it's only recently these calls have registered from my line. He said it must be a guest or a neighbour. I advised him that nobody comes to the house other than my family on the odd visit and they haven't been up this way since last year. I asked to speak to a manager, he refused to let me do this.

 

So I asked him to bar all PR numbers and he said I already had call barring. He gave me a code *347# to bar premium numbers

 

We went over it about three times, getting nowhere. He then had the bare faced cheek to ask if I was happy with his customer service. I said no. He asked for the reason and I told him I'd already told him 3 times, he wouldn't listen to what I had to say, wouldn't put me through to a manager when asked, didn't offer me the complaints procedure. He then said he would put me through to his manager but the manager was unavailable - that I accept is not his fault - then asked me to please be happy with the service. I said no. So he said my account would be treated specially. I asked what this meant and he began to explain before cutting me off.

 

Definately emailing that CEO, thanks Ell-enn. I think it's my only hope of getting anywhere.

 

I've tried dialling that code *347# and it doesn't bar premium numbers, it bars all outgoing calls! What a flippin mess.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erika, you will get a response from that email address even at weekends! make sure you give a number you can be contacted on.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've tried dialling that code *347# and it doesn't bar premium numbers, it bars all outgoing calls! What a flippin mess.

 

that service costs £5 a month my son has it on this phone to stop the kids phoning mobile numbers when he is out

Link to post
Share on other sites

ErikaPNP,

the guy from BT is talking nonsense. Last year criminals were placing these calls on customers lines from roadside boxes in order to collect the revenue from the Networks. Her's the email reply I reived from PhonepayPlus.

Dear ********

 

Many thanks for your e-mail and the information contained within it. I have now had the opportunity to speak to both Call Republic and BT’s fraud department in relation to this matter.

 

BT have confirmed they have been investigating this for some time and have now passed their report to the police to review. They are aware that this problem has affected a number of their customers and believe that a form of ‘hacking’ into personal lines has taken place. BT are aware of all their consumers that have been affected by this problem and are refunding upon request. They have also been in recent contact with the PhonepayPlus Investigations team to obtain further information about the companies contracted on the numbers generating any charges.

 

PhonepayPlus will assist both BT and the police in providing any information that may assist their enquiries as requested but will not open a formal investigation as no breach of the Code of Practice has taken place – this appears to be fraud and this is therefore a matter for the police to investigate. Any link between Call Republic and similar problems that may have previously occurred (such as in 1995) will hopefully be discovered as part of the police investigation. We will not be in a position to provide any further information, such as any company that may have sub-contracted with Call Republic to anyone other than BT or the police as part of their investigation.

 

I can assure you that I have discussed this matter in detail with Paul Whiteing, Chief Executive of PhonepayPlus who is in full agreement with this course of action. Mr Whiteing has regular meetings with Sir Alistair Graham and an update will be added to the next agenda.

 

If you do have any further questions please do not hesitate to contact me.

 

Regards

 

*************

Head of Consumer Support

could you post the numbers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally, BT billing service is working again. The numbers are

 

09016550003

09016550001

09040430000

09012250008

They are always less than a minute but have been called hundreds of times since January (I get quarterly bills online) and it's cost me a fortune. A google search shows that they are connected to Sky, but I still dispute them because I have only ever called 08 numbers when calling Sky and it can't be through the remote because I have a bar on Sky purchases, it needs a PIN which I know my kids don't know because it was asked for when they tried to watch an over 18 programme I'd recorded and it asked for a PIN, and also because the times of day the number appears on my bill when no-one is near the TV. Had Sky for years too without these numbers appearing on my BT bill until lately.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Holy cow!

 

I emailed as Ell-en said and my god I got a phone call within a few minutes! I told the gent the numbers appear to be Sky but that it is still not possible to have come from my line and given the reasons why. They are going to look into it.

 

I didn't expect a response that quickly. Can't fault that.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry i told you earlier it was the sky box.

 

http://whocallsme.com/Phone-Number.aspx/09016550003

 

not been looking at this thread.

 

its when it tries to register for the premium chat stuff on late at night on the adult channels

it can be done with the press of a single wrong button

it can also happen when a channel you were watcging early goes over to the 'latenight' stuff [changes use]

interactive and PPV channel does it too.

 

if you dont watch and PPV TV or 'pay' for movies

simple answer is to unplug the sky box from the phone socket.

 

if you look on the skybox log

you'll see it wants to do it to 'confirm' a purchase

just delete it.

from the log

 

more later i've gotta pop out

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.phonepayplus.org.uk/Number-Checker/Check-a-Number-Results.aspx?ncn=09012250008

Check A Number - Result

Unfortunately PhonepayPlus does not have any information about the number 09012250008.

If you want to log a complaint to PhonepayPlus online please click here.

Alternatively, you can call our helpline on 0800 500 212 (Mon-Fri, 0900-1700).

You could alternatively contact your mobile phone network and ask them for details about this number and advice about what to do next.

Want to find out more about Phone Paid Services?

all four numbers give the above which is a bit odd if they were Sky numbers

 

from this

http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/numbering/index.htm#geog1

all four numbers belong to Thus Plc

 

so I'm guessing they may be 'free' to play games from the Sky box but not Sky.

 

http://whocallsme.com/Phone-Number.aspx/09016550003

http://whocallsme.com/Phone-Number.aspx/09016550001

http://whocallsme.com/Phone-Number.aspx/09040430000

http://whocallsme.com/Phone-Number.aspx/09012250008

 

I wouldn't necessarily blame your kids at this point...there really are some very unscrupulous companies about

 

sorry I can't be much help but keep us updated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...