Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • now do you want help or just come here to rant at the 1st chance. is this indictive of why you have this issue with BG? there isn't one really just you being pedantic? now give us a chance to decide lets have some info. we don't accept .jpg picture files as they are displayed directly to screen whereby anyone members or not can see them, hence we require a multipage pdf properly redacted. theres a good upload guide to read on that. so ball is your court... we still would help our worst enemy regardless . dx
    • doh sorry was on phone screen. i think thats all ok,  let @AndyOrch confirm 1st please. dx  
    • Same date as poc then i dont like the agreement either, it just smells to me, but i can't find a like one of that era to compare against. this is only 10yrs old, so weight that up, i'd say enforceable & most are from the ear as a whole here. it cant be a recon as they must state so, and it wouldn't/doesn't need to have a tickbox+typed name to be so either. >80% loss if you go fwd, unless you can pay the CCJ within 30 days of judgement in FULL, might be time to consider a tomlin/consent, as much as i hate link, if you don't want to gamble on a very small chance of a win or can't pay within 30 days if you lose. what date is the hearing? dx    
    • Hi T911 and welcome to CAG. As you say, an interesting screw up. So much for quality control! Anyway, our regular advice is to ignore all of their increasingly threatening missives... UNLESS you get a letter of claim, then come back here and we'll help you write a "snotty letter" to help them decide whether to take it any further with their stoopid pics. If you get mail you're unsure of, just upload it for the team to have a look.
    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car Insurance Cancelled


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4738 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Can anyone give me some advice please? About 4 years ago I stupidly ignored requests from my car insurance company to send them some paperwork (even though i had it and could easily have done so). The end result of this was they cancelled my policy. Although I'd like to just clarify i never lied ot them or became late with any payment.

 

I won't bore you with details but I was going though a very difficult time then and frankly couldn't care less about the consequences. I accept i just completely buried my head in the sand becuase i couldn't face sorting out a minor issue, and take full responsibilty for it.

 

However, my life's now back on track and since then I've been declaring each year that i have had insurance cancelled, which has been costing me a fortune.

 

My question is, do i have to do this forever, or is there a time limit? It seems a bit unfair if i still have to do this in 20 years and get lumped in with people who deliberately lied to their provider.

 

Any help please?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no time limit as such, which is worse than a criminal conviction which is covered by the rehab of offender act.

 

Without knowing the reason for cancellation, difficult to comment. If it is purely about documents not being returned, then I would not worry too much. The Insurers would have cancelled, as their procedures required this. Normally it is cases where fraud or deliberate non disclosure had been found out, where you would have a problem following a cancellation, as these would be recorded on a central database.

 

So my advice is to arrange cover normally, but to mention the cancellation in a way, that it was of no conseuquence i.e that documents they required did not get returned in time due to an admin oversight on your part. If you make a big deal of it, then they will deal with it in that way.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply

 

Right ok. It does sound unfair yes. It's a shame they don't do it in categories with the most serious kinds (involving fraud and deliberate non-disclosure) getting the lifetime thing. Although i know I've only got myself to blame.

 

Just to make sure I've got it right then, the best way is to sort insurance out over the phone, explaining that a previous insurer cancelled a policy a few years ago because I didn't return documents in time. Is that right?

 

I'm concerned that if they allow it but then don't make a note they could bring it up in the event of a claim. I wouldnt want to risk them saying i hadn't told them.

 

I don't suppose there's any likelyhood of the original insurer revoking the decision after of a big grovely apology with official records to back up the problems I was having? I guess not but I thought it's worth asking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are worrying unnecessarily about this. Some of this is caused by totally misleading posts and comments online about having to tell Insurers of every single type of cancellation, just in case they turn around and decline a claim.

 

If you can answer no to this question then I would not even bother to advise of the cancellation.

 

Have you ever had a policy cancelled due to either non disclosure or fraudulent conduct ?

 

If you are really worried about this speak to the previous Insurers who cancelled the policy. Ask for them to confirm in writing that the cancellation is not of the type that needs to be disclosed when arranging future Insurances.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't agree. The question is usually, 'have you ever had insurance declined or cancelled?' If you say no, that is untrue. Now, you are not some villain who has tried to cheat the insurers at some point, just someone who didn't send in proof that you indeed did have.

 

One would not think it significant, but we must remember that insrance companies are businesses there to make a profit. In the event of a claim they will take whatever reasoanbel steps they have at their disposal to minimise losses and that will mean going through the appliaction for insurance with a fine toothcomb. If they find you omitted any information that would or could have effected their decision to offer you insurance, they will void the policy and refund your premium paid in preference to paying for the damage caused.

 

I am reminded of the story recently of a woman who's house burned down. She had paid for insurance without claiming for something like 20 years. When she actually needed to claim they dug and boy did they dig deep. They found she had a caution for being drunk when she was 18 (now 50 something) or something equally trivial and that she did not disclose it when she originally applied for insurance, so they cancelled her insurance and refunded all her premiums - about £5k worth rather than pay for her £200k house to be rebuilt.

 

I will try to find the actual story.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dennis

 

Your view is shared by many, particularly brokers. I am not saying you are doing this, but some brokers post comments online about the cancellation issue, hoping to drive business down the broking route. i.e. if people believe that they have to inform of every cancellation, they are more likely to use a broker.

 

For the OP it is up to them what they do. If they have nothing to hide, as the cancellation was purely about documents not being returned, after the point of sale, then I can't see any Insurers using this to decline a claim. But if the OP is a cautious person then they should simply arrange cover by phone for the rest of their lives and mention that they once had a policy cancelled as they forgot to return some documents. In 5,10,20 years, this might seem a bit silly, if they have nothing to hide.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wanted to say a massive thank you for your help with this. I've been in touch with my present insurer and they agreed what happened didn't count as a cancellation as they meant it. So as i had to get a new policy anyway i did a quick price comparison search, called the best offer, explained the situation, and got a fantastic price!

 

Although I've been paying a lot extra for the last few years, I'm happy to take that on the chin as it was a stupid thing to do anyway. Regarding how i had to ring up, I think I'll do the same for the next few years just to make sure the insurance companies are happy with it. Then in maybe 4-5 years or so I'll just do it online again, providing all goes well.

 

In case you're interested, my original insurer was Sheila's Wheels, and the new policy with with Tesco's.

 

Thank you again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...