Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
    • Just be careful with your language on what you post here - Keep it above board Lets see what you send to the big boss. 
    • I made that payment on 13th Feb, then it all went down hill. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4751 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All. Friend of Hamsters has had his car damaged. It was parked on a residential street with terrace houses along both sides. During some recent windy weather a brick chimney pot collapsed and, although the bricks missed the car the TV aerial didn't. It has damaged one door and scratched to door glass. For a good repair it needs a door skin and a glass, plus two trims. About £1200 worth.

 

The householder is a tenant and the landlords insurance are refusing to pay out as it was an 'Act of God'. Is this a valid and genuine reason?

 

Friend could claim on his car insurance but can't afford his excess.

 

Which direction should we pursue this? Landlords insurance or car insurance or let car insurance fight landlords insurance.

 

Friend is a tenant somewhere else so he does not have contents insurance, thus no legal expenses insurance but we may be able to get some help from his own car insurers who I believe are Tesco's. Insurance was recently renewed with Tesco's and it's now with Tesco Bank, not RBS.

 

Hammy :-)

44 years at the pointy end of the motor trade. :eek:

GARUDALINUX.ORG

Garuda Linux comes with a variety of desktop environments like KDE, GNOME, Cinnamon, XFCE, LXQt-kwin, Wayfire, Qtile, i3wm and Sway to choose from.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hammy

 

 

"Which direction should we pursue this? Landlords insurance or car insurance or let car insurance fight landlords insurance."

 

I have had a bit of experience with an incident like this as I was asked to inspect a chimney stack that had collapsed during a storm an insurance company paid me to report on any defects to cut a very long story short it was eventually decided that the house owner was at fault due to poor maintence as they have a duty of care to ensure the property is in a good state of repair to prevent injury and damage.

Hope this helps, if I were you I would be tempted to let car insurance haggle with house insurance but this may go on for a long time

CB

Still Fighting 4 PPI claims getting there slowly :smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All. Friend of Hamsters has had his car damaged. It was parked on a residential street with terrace houses along both sides. During some recent windy weather a brick chimney pot collapsed and, although the bricks missed the car the TV aerial didn't. It has damaged one door and scratched to door glass. For a good repair it needs a door skin and a glass, plus two trims. About £1200 worth.

 

The householder is a tenant and the landlords insurance are refusing to pay out as it was an 'Act of God'. Is this a valid and genuine reason?)

I would not have considered it to be valid, as it appears intended to exculpate the mortals whose negligence may have contributed to the fall of the chimney.

 

It would not be a very good idea to use that excuse as the basis of a claim against the Church of England, even if they might once have claimed to be God's agents on Earth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Little chance of recovery, unless the owner/occupier was aware of the impending accident and it can be documented or agreed that this was brought to their attention, there is little chance of proving negligence. If the chimney withstood normal winds and it was a storm force that brought it down, then it was an act of God.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Before so readily accepting that this was an act of god, I would query the condition of the roof. If the roof looks like it has been well maintained then you might have a struggle on your hands, however, if it is pretty shabby then, as curly bob states, a reasonable landlord needs to "ensure the property is in a good state of repair to prevent injury and damage."

 

Also you state it was pretty windy - not storm conditions. Have the Insurers "proved" that the winds were strong enough to damage a well maintained chimney?

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was an "act of God".... then how can anyone successfully claim storm damage when such situations occur?

 

I've had a claim for storm damage go through on my roof before. I needed to give them the precise date of the storm and they sent someone round to assess the condition of the roof..... It went through with no probs. but I needed to get 2 estimates for repair beforehand (if I remember rightly).

 

Same principle.... in that God must have caused that weather, so to speak.... lol

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not true priorityone. You claimed for storm damage under your own insurance. You have entered a contract with your insurer, and they have agreed to pay out for damage to your property caused by storm.

 

However, we are talking about claiming under liability insurance. Hamsters friend has to prove the owner of the chimney stack was negligent in causing the house to fall under a state of disrepair, that it was obvious the chimney stack would have fallen over.

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not true priorityone. You claimed for storm damage under your own insurance. You have entered a contract with your insurer, and they have agreed to pay out for damage to your property caused by storm.

 

However, we are talking about claiming under liability insurance. Hamsters friend has to prove the owner of the chimney stack was negligent in causing the house to fall under a state of disrepair, that it was obvious the chimney stack would have fallen over.

 

Oh I see.... apologies.... :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Negligence goes beyond the state of the roof, you have to prove the roof was in a bad state, not be able to withstand normal winds and the main factor, that the landlord was aware of it and did nothing.

To prove this, he/she would have to admit to being aware and doing nothing, or you, or someone else brought it to their attention.

You may want to speak to the tennants see if they knew about it, if they did, did nothing - i.e not tell the landlord, it could be their occupiers liability under the contents that picks this up.

Leave it to your insurers, but make them aware you want them to look into this, not just give in at the first go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...