Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update - Still receiving emails and letters - but have been getting text messages too. nothing aggressive just asking me to get in touch.    the text makes it look like it from the bank on first glance - it reads -   'the banks name' would like to dicuss our recent communication...etc... then lists IDR phone number and email FYI - reporting them as spam
    • Hello, After seeing all of the posts about BMW on here I really wish I hadn't even considered them! I bought a used car from them over the weekend, one specifically which had a reversing camera and cruise control in the advert. I was foolish at the time of purchase and didn't check to see these functions work on the test drive (totally my fault). Now that the car is home I've checked and checked and neither of these functions are available. I even checked on Parkers and it seems that no Skoda Kamiq '21 models come with any parking cameras at all. When buying the car, I was told all that was needed was 'Four signatures and £500' to secure it. I was never shown any of the documents, and instead the sales rep opened a box on his iPad and asked me to sign. He had been complaining about the length of time some customers take these days all throughout my time with him. (Again) foolishly I signed. In my email inbox I now have four attachments from BMW, one of which is my signature under a letter which basically says that the cars don't need to match the advertisements online, or have any of the features that a sales rep talks about. I realise that I've made mistakes in not doing my due diligence here, but thought I might as well ask the experts here if I have any rights left to claim that the car was miss-advertised, or if I unknowingly signed them away? Thanks in advance
    • where was this PCN:? please complete: pers i cant see the point in an sar yet await/if they ever send a letter of claim. as long as you've not moved since 2022 you are OK to totally ignore . dx  
    • ah this is a B2B PCP then as your are sending the SAR as a private individual and not as repping the co. you need to prove to them. unfortunately, i think that will also reset the 30 days. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Equity Red Star/Drive Assist Write Off Pay Out


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4385 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone!

 

I would like some advice if you could help me!

 

I had an accident a couple of months ago, a car pulled out from a side road into my vehicle. I've contacted my insurance and told them it was the 3rd partys fault but they are now disputing liability.

 

The problem I am having is that my insurers have written off my vehicle and I am now without a car. I sent back the hire car as the liability eventually would be with me if the insurers couldn't recover costs, so at £50+ a day I didnt want to risk it. I have agreed a write off settlement with my insurers and the registration of the car has now been passed over to them. But as the liability is now in dispute I have been told I wont get any payment until it is resolved with the 3rd party!

 

Is this correct? It seems wrong that my insurers have my car and will be selling it for scrab and I'm left with nothing until this is resolved. Who knows how long it will take...months, over a year!? Can my insurers not give me the fee we agreed, then when the case is resolved request it from the 3rd party or request the excess from me?

 

To give an overview, my insurers are Santander the underwriters/administrators are Equity Red Star. They have passed it onto Drive Assist who are now dealing with it and Incident Management Solutions scrapped the car and agreed a write off fee with me, and my solicitor is through Minster Law. This is all new to me so a bit confusing that soo many partys are involved!

 

Sorry if this is a bit long winded, but any advice would be much appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have comp cover, once a settlement for the write off has been agreed, the Insurers will normally pay you the settlement less the excess. The Insurers would continue to pursue liability with the third party Insurers and you would also pursue your excess at the same time via your legal expenses people. If your Insurers managed to make the case the third party was liable, then they would recover their outlay and any loss of no claims would be reinstated, plus your excess would be paid back to you separately.

 

If this is not the way it is working, then I suggest that you ask Santander to look into this. Santander use BISL as the intermediary and they are usually about as useful as a chocolate teapot, so you might have to be insistent that they make enquiries for you.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Drive Assist have been appointed by your broker EDBL (Equity direct broking ltd) to deal with your claim on a non fault basis, which is fine when it is, but as soon as a discpute comes in it goes t-up. I doubt your underwriters ERS have been involved at all.

The reason the payment is being withheld is Drive Assist can only recover from the third party insurer, not pay you out, and when there's a dispute there's no payout from the third party insurer. At this point as you are now out of hire, I doubt drive assist could care less.

You need to complain and complain hard to the broker. They are stiffing you, all the whilst getting a kickback from drive assist and minster law for your claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thanks alot guys (sorry for the late reply), this is a real help. Been bogged under with other things...I'll get onto equity and transfer it over to them. What a load of hassle!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Hi slapmiheed, very interested to read your thread. I know it was a long time ago but I am curious to know the outcome. I am in a similar situation (however I kept hold of the hire car from Drive Assist and kicked up one hell of a fuss with my broker The Post Office. Likewise Incident Management Solutions said my car was a "write off" (but they changed ownership and never wrote it off) but TPI refused to pay their ridiculously inflated repair costs. Drive Assist sent me a reduced amount from TPI after 8months of them battling it out and expected me to pay the garage directly for the repairs - for a car that didn't even belong to me anymore. I refused, saying I wanted ownership reinstating first. This didn't happen. Drive Assist paid the garage for the repairs and then "snatched back" their hire car.

 

Hence I do not own or possess a vehicle or any total loss settlement. What a shower of ****.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...