Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Disciplinary for not working over contracted hours..advice please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4776 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On behalf of a friend...

 

Annual leave booked and approved. 4 days before due to go on holiday, friend has been told he has to work for 2 days of the leave period, as there is no one else to cover, and the 'supervisor' has a social event that they wish to attend and not forgo. Part time contract, the hours at the end of the week will take them over the contracted hours, friend has been told that if he doesn't turn up to do the hours they will be facing disciplinary. (holiday all booked, leaving during time now expected to work)

 

Advice please? where do they stand on the contracted hours/extra issue?

 

thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your friend could always hope they do take disciplinary action then they can sue the ar**se of the employer.

Unless there is specific mention in the contract that they must drop all and bend over .....then they are within their rights to work the hours they are contracted to work and not a second longer.

People who work over and above the hours contracted do so as a favour(and extra cash) but it cannot be taken for granted by the employer they will do so every time they are asked.

 

wd

Link to post
Share on other sites

Complicated. What does the contract of employment say about holidays? What does it also say about the need to work overtime on occasion to cover unexpected periods of demand? If not stated in the contract, then what has been the position in the past, ie has your friend previously worked above his contracted hours without complaint in similar circumstances.

 

As far as the holiday goes, it is a tricky one, as once a holiday is booked and agreed, this would be a contractual matter and if the employer were to force a cancellation, this may well be considered a breach of contract, however there would be little that the employee could do except to resign and claim Constructive Dismissal - a drastic, and VERY risky course of action with little realistic chance of success.

 

The normal practice would be to try and work out the grievance before the event, perhaps by negotiation. Agree to work one but not both days? Agree to work both days in return for time and a half back (cancel two days holiday to get three back later)? Extra pay? If the friend were to be going away, or if the cancellation were to result in a financial loss, there is also the matter of compensation.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the help so far.

The 'supervisor' is asking/demanding my friend to work the first two days of the 'leave' that was asked for and agreed. The holiday is booked to begin then, hence a cancellation fee will be incrued. There have been several occasions before when a weekend off has been owed, and changed, almost always due to the supervisor wanting to attend their own personal nights/social events. This time, it is because the supervisor has a social event that they can't/don't want to miss.Seems to always be fitted around them and no 'give and take for anyone else' Concerns have been expressed before to the supervisor, who has become verbally aggressive, and upon taking it verbally to the next level of management, usually has been sorted...until the next time.

The contract is part time, but hours have varied, and even with protestations about doing more than contracted has always been threatened with sanctions/warnings etc if not compliant.

 

Just checking the contract. Thanks for support, friend in bits over this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can quite understand your friend's anxiety. Things like this are what separates good and considerate employers from bad ones.

 

Insofar as the law is concerned, an employer does have the right to dictate when holiday can and cannot be taken, however once booked and agreed this represents a contract, and as with any contract, there have to be remedies for a breach. As already stated, a breach of an employment contract would normally be remedied through an Employment Tribunal, and the cancellation of a pre-booked holiday may well be grounds for Constructive Dismissal on the grounds that it (together with 'enforced' overtime, unless covered by an agreement in the contract) represents a fundamental breach which makes it impossible for the employee to continue working there. The problem with that is that an ET firstly do not like to interfere with the running of a business, and in the current environment of businesses trying to stay afloat may determine that the requirement was not 'unreasonable' in the circumstances, however even if the decision was to be in your friend's favour, the compensation for the breach would be limited and unlikely to adequately make amends - and there would still be the issue of finding new employment.

 

There are also remedies for contractual breaches through the County Court, and that would be where the issue of compensation for cancellation may come in, however if a legal route were to be the desired option, then this would undoubtedly cause irreparable harm to the employment relationship and your friend would still be on a slippery slope towards finding another job. That is why these matters, where possible should be resolved informally. Your friend will therefore need to raise a grievance, outlining the unreasonable nature of the request to cancel holiday and work over and above the contractual hours. If there is nothing in his contract to say that 'additional hours may be required...in the interests of the business' (a fairly standard clause), then he may quite rightly protest, although if he has done so without protest in the past (hence why I asked) then this would weaken the argument.

 

He is really stuck between the devil and the deep blue with this one, so it all comes down to how angry he feels, how far he is prepared to push the point, and how likely it would be that another job might be available in the near future. A threat of legal redress might well fire a shot across the employer's bows, but equally it may well damage the relationship beyond repair. Not to say that he doesn't have right on his side, but ultimately the employer pays the wages...

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...