Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I was caught shoplifting 4 items £20 worth, I’m petrified the Police will come to my house now please can you help. What can I do I worried about my job. 
    • I heard nothing more from J&P but have now had an email from the bank saying they have instructed IDR to act on their behalf?  so are they just passing it back? Selling it on again? I don’t know if this is a good or bad thing 
    • I posted a couple of years ago about our debt situation and have been trying to pay off our debt as best we can. It is a possibility I maybe made redundant in a few months time, so I am trying to find out everything I can about what happens in today’s world when you can’t pay. I keep finding conflicting advice on various sites so I wanted to post this quote to get thoughts. It claims basically that the dca will likely get enforceable documents these days and therefore it’s likely you will have to pay dca at some point during the 6 year process.    on here I read a lot of comments assuming the exact opposite of this. A lot of the threads on here state the beginning of the process but I never see conclusive stuff about what happened from start to finish to get insight into whether debts post 2015 have been enforced etc. I hear a lot here not to pay dca companies but most my debts are post 2015 debts I am all up to date on our debts but if I lose my job it is likely I’ll end up where I tried to avoid in the first place. Which is destroying our files and dealing with DCA. I’ll post it below so you can see what I mean.   It is likely that any debts incurred after 2007 will end up with all the documentation being provided and being enforceable. Therefore you should use the time while awaiting responses going through your Income & Expenditure and considering any possiblity of making a full and final settlement. It can take a number of months to reach the stage of a hearing date and exchange of witness statements and normally you would be able to settle or come to an arrangement to pay before the court hearing, once documents have been provided, although this isn’t guaranteed.
    • depends who said sols state their client is. IDRWW vis~IDR(worldWide) are a debt collector regulated & registered in the UK & USA    they are not solicitors. they use various 'for hire' - here use our letterhead paper tiger solicitors. its just a case of who's stupid enough to join their folly. IDR law used to be their fav but they lost do much money, they broke ties after almost being struck off and now do Will/Probate disputes only. IDR Legal are their sols wing. moriarty law Judge and priestly Taheel - a foreign DCA that use absolutely any trick in the book to extort money even pretending to be any of the above inc being the bank themselves in phone calls.           
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

hfo services


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4646 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

latest news...

 

just received documents from citicard in response to my SAR request but this is what was included not a lot.......

1

copy of personal data which just gives name ,address nemployed or not bank acc. etc etc nothing really

2

a letter to them from me dated19/11/04requesting they cancel repayment protection...

3

montly accounts up to 8/5/06. last payment was on statement date 8/sept/05

Thats it no copy of agreement.ie terms and conditions as they state in there accompaning letter that these fall outside the definition 0f perpuses of the data protection act.

similarly . s7 (1) © only require a data controller to provide a copy the information constituting any personal data ,not the actual document on which the personal data is recorded.

 

so ive not got the agreement with terms and conditions so i cannot check if hfo services are entitled to be the way they are.

 

they state that no statements were produced fot this account after may 2006 as the account was sold to hfo..

as stated earlier i did not receive any notification of assignment from citi until hfo contacted me as per my first post on here.

 

so coledog and the others that are helping me, question.

hfo said over £4000 owed but this information shows £2543.68p so i might guess that hfo are trying to add the other £1500 as there charges. ha ha.

what do i do now as i have not had a thing back from hfo , and i have sent them the notice that they failed to provide me with the information i requested in my cca.account under dispute..

help please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Complain to the OFT, this is completely unreasonable behaviour, they have NOT complied fully with the SAR request and to have sat on this debt for 5 years is way out of line. They are aware of HFO at the moment so your complaint is merited. Also you need to complain to the Information Commissioners Office about the information they have sent in regard to your SAR request, they have not complied and a complaint to them is in order too.

 

They should have sent a statement from when they brought the account showing the interest levied, and letters sent to you about their taking over the account, none of this seems present.

 

IMHO you tell them to get knotted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have just looked at hfo 72 hour letter it states citicard and the account number and is for just over £4000 so it is there interest ie the £1500 .but this is not valid is it cos even today ive not had a notice of assignment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The SAR is pretty standard for Citi actually you will not get much more out of them. Did the covering letter say anything about them not retaining documents or some such rubbish? Did they say who the account was sold to and when? They are very unlikely to have an application form or credit agreement or will not reveal it if they have. Read some of the threads on the Citi forum about why they have not retained documents. What they are trying to say is that they will not cobble together a re-con agreement, basically sets of T and Cs, which they would have to do if you sent them a CCA request but they may do this for HFO in response to your CCA request to them.

 

Have you sent HFO the 'Account in Dispute' letter yet? This is very important and will stop them sending you letters.

 

You are correct about the HFO 'interest' added, it is very unlikely that they can justify this.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

coledog

citi do not mention not retained documents .

no they only state there were no statements produced for this account after may 2006 as the account was sold to hfo......

no date it was sold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will have to wait the full 40 days from making the SAR request to see if they send anything else. If not, you can write and ask them for anything else and put the pressure on.

 

Did it just say it was sold to 'HFO', what exactly was the wording?

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

i have just received from hfo a so called copy of my agreement with citicard, it appears to be 2 copies one 11 pages long the other 12 pages, but it has no dates on it and no signature, so it could have been cobbled together last week. and it says a lot but at the same time tells me nothing.

i have no dates it went in default no amounts, and haw do they get £4000 when citicard statements show £2500. what do i do now. please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have received e-mail from the oft concerning my complaint to them about hfo services it was a form to sign to give the oft to use it against them.

i have given them my permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the agreement is a 'recon' send them this, recorded do not sign

 

Address

 

Date

 

Dear sir/madam

 

I acknowledge no debt to your company.

 

Thank you for your response to my request under the Consumer Credit Act section 78.

 

As you have forwarded a reconstituted agreement, you will need to confirm that you have the original signed Agreement, and in what form, ie microfiche, together with the reason this has not been sent at this request.

 

I consider that this account is still in dispute.

 

As you must realise this agreement does not conform to sections 60(1) and 61(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and would therefore only be enforceable by a court under s65. However, the absence of any personal details and signature means that a court would be prevented from enforcing it under s127(3).

 

I am granting to you a further 21 days to produce a copy of an executable agreement. After that I will consider that the above account is closed and that you will no longer pursue the alleged debt.

 

After this period you should close the file and cease processing any personal data relating to me on this matter.

 

Yours faithfully

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi

Welcome to The Consumer Action Group.

 

 

I am just letting you know that as you haven't had any replies to your post yet, it might be better if you post your message again in an appropriate sub-forum. You will get lots of help there.

 

Also take some time to read around the forum and get used to the layout. It is a big forum and takes a lot of getting used to.

 

 

Once you start to find your way, you will soon realise that it is fairly easy to get round and to get the help you need.

 

It can be bit confusing at first.

Please be advised that my time will be limited for the next few weeks.Thanks for your understanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

the letter hfo have sent me ie the noa is dated 20th march 2006 but this is the first i have known of it.

there is no terms and conditions attached.

they have sent another letter with it it states

please be advised that monument do not provide copies of the original agreement, only provide copies of the reply card which holds your personal details, and signature to which show you agree for the monument account.....

the reply card card they refer to does not mention monument it is a request for a credit card on 21/06/04 and was supposedly returned to me with barclays stamped over it and dated 23/july 2004. but no terms and conditions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First thing is to find out the last payment, phone no for Barclaycard is 0844 556 0066, you also need to ask on what date the account was sold and to who.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well nearly stat barred, you should still phone to confirm this, I bet the sale date is different to what is on the NoA, don,t forget that NoA was produced by HFO.........

Edited by broken arrow

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

r hfo allowed to charge there high interest after they sit on an account for over 5 years with no correspondence to you .

 

Only once they have given notice, hence the back dated notice.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...