Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • a CCJ does not 'expire' thus does not need any application to a court to 'extend it'. if a CCJ has not been enforced within 6yrs, then it is very unlikely any court would grant such should the claimant return to court, of which the defendant would be advised -( unless they have moved and not informed the court & the claimant such) .  
    • I contacted them when it happened. The caretaker came over, looked at it, and walked off with the tree chunks of mortar. Next morning, they had a roofer come over and enter our garden to inspect it. Friday they were supposed to speak with a scaffolding company. I had to bring up liability and potentially calling the council to report 'an unsafe structure' before they even got moving. They know all about the wedding, the preparations, our patio contractors etc. but their attitude doesn't instill me with confidence. My fear is it will end up being a legal matter which is why I posted here to hopefully receive some advice. As far as I can see, the roof is in a state of disrepair, even if it's just the mortar breaking lose due to the size and weight of the chunks - and even from ground level it's visibly clear that multiple pieces have fallen over time (though never this size so we haven't been able to identify the issue till now - we thought it was rubble left in the garden by the previous owner). Currently, we can't use 25% of our garden due to the risk of more falling mortar which is more than just an inconvenience, we can't proceed with our contractors, and at worst, it will run up in several thousand of extra expenses for us, if we have to find a wedding venue. Even if they do have it fixed in time, and we have to settle for renting a marquee and floor for the marquee and furniture and whatnot it will be additional costs only due to the neighbour's roof.
    • It will be years before Banks would sell to a debt buyer.  Sometimes Banks will use external debt collectors to try to collect, but generally Banks don't take Court action.  So you could be looking at 3 to 6 years, before any dca owning debt looks to take any Court action. And it is not definite that this would happen. So no need to feel pressured at this stage. In the event you found yourself unemployed, you have time to engage with Banks to advise of your situation and ask for time to deal with the situation, find new employment. As long as you inform the Banks they will offer assistance they can. E.g offer payment holiday or accept reduced payment for period. What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

rented for 6 years, now applied for housing benefit - landlord wants to serve notice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4828 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

 

We have been renting a property for nearly 6 years, always paid our rent by standing order and on time.

Unfortunately, my husband has been laid off recently and to get by until he resecures new employment we have applied for housing benefit.

we filled out the forms and sent the page to our landlord.

Now our landlord left a message on our answer machine, saying that her 'mortgage company' does not except tenants that are on housing benefit. (We have never been on benefits before).

She also claims that she has to serve us a 'section 21' notice (2 months)

 

Now obviously, we cannot afford a house move, have nowhere to move too yet and actually don't want to move. We have 3 children under the age of 10 who go to school here in the village and we hope not to stay on benefits for too long as we are actively seeking re-employment.

 

Can anyone give us some advice? Where do we legally stand with this? As far as we understand is that the landlord will not notice the difference when it comes to her monthly rent as I believe that it is fully covered.

 

We haven't phoned the landlord back yet, and want to be prepared.. so appreciate your help very much!

 

Flo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Legally - the landlord can absolutely do this I'm afraid.

 

Moreover if the mortgage company doesnt allow HB, she MUST do this.

 

Sorry but there really isnt much of a way around this...

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As MrShed said, but was the ban on claiming HB included in the AST / clearly explained at start of T?

or is it a condition of the mortgage that LL cannot offer property to Ts already claiming HB?

 

I would suggest you arrange to meet LL asap, appreciate her mortgage dilemma and decide whether she is just using it as an excuse.. Perhaps ask her who is her mortgage provider and then do some online research.

 

Technically she has already inadvertantly breached any no HB clause in her mortgage and will do so for a further 2 months so should advise them of the change to your status. She could enquire if an existing recently made redundant T of 6 yrs and now only recently claiming HB, is covered by the clause.

She may be able to negotiate a clause suspension for a 6 month period. if she doesn't want to lose a reliable tenant.

If mortgage/LL provider demands your legal eviction for claiming HB entitlement in this economic downturn they could receive an adverse press.

It is fair enough excluding HB claimants from taking new tenancies & evicting those who fail to maintain rent payments IMO

 

In this case, it is in everyones interest for LL to receive rent and make the mortgage repayments.

Is your partner claiming JSA? contribution or income-based?

What is his chances of new employment in that area?

 

It is possible LLs property insurance also contains a No HB clause.

The other reason that HB claimants are feared is that LHA rates and entitlement can change with govt policy as per Apr 2011.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would advise any T to keep LL apprised of any change in circumstance.

If the T can maintain AST condition of paying rent on due date, LL is likely non the wiser.

However many HB claimants expect rent to be covered by Council although any claim can take several weeks to process and may be refused.

HB is always paid 2-4 weeks in arrears and T may not use it to pay rent.

The T can quickly become 2 months behind in due rent and open to a s8 repossession Notice whilst awaiting HB

LL is entitled to direct payment of HB if T is >8wks in arrears.

If HB claim has been submitted I would suggest the T provides the LL with DPA consent form allowing LL to discuss certain aspects of claim with Council.

 

Recently I had a T required to claim HB due to redundany. HB dept refused payment on the basis the AST had expired (beyond fixed term) Only the LL could confirm applicant was still T and the AST was now a Statutory Periodic, a concept alien to HB dept.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My claim has been approved for my full rent on the basis of an expired (the fixed term has) AST lease. They did require an electric/water/gas bill from the last month to prove I still lived there.

 

Fortunately I am in the position to pay this and next months rent.

 

I can see how a tenant could get into arrears if they are unable to cover those 4 weeks before the first payment + the time taken to complete a claim. My claim again was straight forward and I had all details to hand.

 

My LL is a large commercial company that owns the entire block I live in, and which is considered 'exclusive'. Fortunately I share the flat with another joint tenant so my rent is halved, and again fortunately my half of rent is covered by the LHA.

 

I feel if my landlord had found out about my claim I would have been served notice to leave or I would have had to provide a guarentor. I have no intention in telling them of my claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The council will not contact LL if you do not want them to.

HB is paid directly to you when approved and you can do what ever you like with it, but is usualy paid to LL to cover the rent or towards it if rent is more than the hb.

In other words the LL need never know if you do not want them to. As long as the rent is paid on time you nothing to worry about.

Some LL like the HB paid direct to them from the council so at least they know they are getting a regular payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The council will not contact LL if you do not want them to.

HB is paid directly to you when approved and you can do what ever you like with it, but (is usualy)
should be
paid to LL to cover the rent or towards it if rent is more than the hb.

In other words the LL need never know if you do not want them to. As long as the rent is paid on time you nothing to worry about.

Some LL (like)
reluctantly accept
the HB paid direct to them from the council so at least they know they are getting a regular payment.
albeit 4 weeks in arrears.
LL can request direct HB payments if T is more than 8 weeks in arrears or a 'vulnerable' T (incapable of managing rent payments?)

 

General observations, consider

1 LL may have mortgage or Ins on property which specifically excludes tenants claiming HB

2 If such exclusion is highlighted in the AST, the T could be in breach of contract, with the Council complicit if they have copy of AST

3 HB is payable to an individual and for a specific address/tenancy, otherwise why require copy of AST?

4 IMO HB should not be transferrable to new address until T can show they have complied with legal requirements to vacate (due Notice) and would remain payable to current LL. The corrollary being the LL cannot effect a s21 unless any deposit is protected, T given prescribed information before s21 Notice served with correct dates specified.

5 IMO DPA does not prevent a Council providing the names & registered addresses only of any HB claimants. This could be restricted online to Council registered LLs and T consent be inc in any HB application (see electoral register reqs)

Best advice is to keep any mortgage provider/LL apprised of reduced finanacial circumstance

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The council will not contact LL if you do not want them to.

.

Unfortunately this is incorrect,Councils have a legal duty to protect tax payers money and can by law contact a LL,to confirm the tenant lives there,confirm how much the rent is and so on,but mainly to prevent Fraud...

 

When you claim HB

 

you have to give the LL/agents address on the HB form,if you don't they can refuse to pay HB..

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

true about putting LL name etc. on application, but you also have to give the council permission to contact them!!

Have any of you filled one of these forms out recently, I have for a friend and thats what it says.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I filled one in last month.

 

They do ask for the Landlord details.

 

The council does not normally contact the LL unless you cannot provide any recent documents showing you still live at the property or a valid original signed lease. They might contact your LL if they believe you to be in arrears or that your LL is a family relation.

 

At my last meeting I asked if they contact my LL as I feared I would be evicted. They said no aslong as the above criteria is met.

 

I have checked my lease and there is no covenant relating to HB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

true about putting LL name etc. on application, but you also have to give the council permission to contact them!!

Have any of you filled one of these forms out recently, I have for a friend and thats what it says.

 

Its true they dont have to contact LL if the tenant has given correct details on HB form and shown council original document,but

 

Councils can and do contact LL/agents without tenant's permission for routine checks,mainly to prevent HB/CT fraud..

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...