Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord charging more for electric


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4843 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I am currently renting a 1 bed flat with my fiancee and we have just recieved our first bill from the landlord (he writes his own) as he says the bill goes to him but all the flats are on sepereate meters.

 

The problem is that for 3 weeks he wants us to pay £76, we are on economy 7 and the 2 storage heaters that we have are on low (3 in 2 out) and have been checked to be working corectly i.e. times.

 

I think this is high and looking at what he is saying,the units are charged at dont really match up to what are the averages for night usage online, he is saying its 8p on a night per unit and 12p unit through day, but on line it says about 4.5 - 5p is average rate also he is charging the flat downsttairs 7p per unit on night rate and 11p day rate, so this concerns me and I think that he migh be lining his own pockets.

 

I have asked him for the itemised bill from the supplier, but I think he will try to flog us off like he did with another tennant. Just wondering what I can do.

 

Also I contacted the suspected supplier and they have told me that there is no record of the address on the national grid i.e. not on there system or over elec suppliers systems?

 

Thanks for any info

Edited by onintks
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

The most a landlord can charge for electricity is what he has paid.

 

You landlord can find himself in deep trouble if he is making a profit on it. Keep all your bills as proof as if he is charging more you will have a case against him.

 

http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/Consumers/Pages/Resaleofgasandelectricity.aspx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just recieved a message on phone with the landlord stating:

 

"I will send you an agrement with the elec company from 3 years ago for prices"

he will not send an actual bill also he says he will send another person bill around to show its a fair price?

 

think there is something deffinatly not right here.

 

contacted solicitor and they say unless it is stated in the contract he can not charge more and to file court proceedings if he still refuses.

 

Thanks for the advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I am currently renting a 1 bed flat with my fiancee and we have just recieved our first bill from the landlord (he writes his own) as he says the bill goes to him but all the flats are on sepereate meters.

 

The problem is that for 3 weeks he wants us to pay £76, we are on economy 7 and the 2 storage heaters that we have are on low (3 in 2 out) and have been checked to be working corectly i.e. times.

 

I think this is high and looking at what he is saying,the units are charged at dont really match up to what are the averages for night usage online, he is saying its 8p on a night per unit and 12p unit through day, but on line it says about 4.5 - 5p is average rate also he is charging the flat downsttairs 7p per unit on night rate and 11p day rate, so this concerns me and I think that he migh be lining his own pockets.

 

I have asked him for the itemised bill from the supplier, but I think he will try to flog us off like he did with another tennant. Just wondering what I can do.

 

Also I contacted the suspected supplier and they have told me that there is no record of the address on the national grid i.e. not on there system or over elec suppliers systems?

 

Thanks for any info

 

Are these separate meters in the flatscoin operated £1.00 or 50p'sThey are covered by this below

 

Hi,

The most a landlord can charge for electricity is what he has paid.

 

You landlord can find himself in deep trouble if he is making a profit on it. Keep all your bills as proof as if he is charging more you will have a case against him.

 

http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/Consumers/Pages/Resaleofgasandelectricity.aspx

Or

 

Are they are utility meters and in the accounts are in LL name

 

If this is so,put them in your name and then you gets the Bills,LL cant stop you doing this.

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just found out that he is supplied with commercial elctric for the shops below, but using the same electric to power the flats via seperate meters. also the supplier has told me that the price he is paid per unit are 5.28p night rate and 8.2p day rate where he is charging us 8p night rate 12p day. so again not to sure where we stand with this, solicitor told me not to pay without seeing a itemised bill (still waiting for it) and take him to court, would he be in a lot of trouble if its illegal.

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

What happesn sometimes is that there is one main meter registered to the building and at a later stage the owner then gets in a private electrician to fit seperate meters for different rooms. The LL gets one bill and should then divide it as per the meter readings. The LL cannot include a daily standing charge or the cost of fitting the meters. As mentioned previously he cannot vary the cost per unit between room/flat/shop and certainly cannot charge more than the original price per unit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All, thanks for all the advice has been very informative.

I am going to see a solicitor tomorrow at court as he has now sent me a message saying that he is charging us at the new rate he will be getting charged in March + all the vat charges, also he has sent an electrician around to change the times our heaters are on (economy 7) i.e changed them from 12:00 - 7am to the new times of 12:00 - 3:00 am only three hours charging time.

 

He has also said that he will charge us only £15 a week instead of £25 but still will not give us an itemised bill.

 

Thanks all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think of it this way. The main meter which is supplying the other meters will still be on E7 between 3am and 8am and he will be charged at off peak rates by the supplier for consumption during those times. If he then charges you peak rates then he is committing an offence as he is making a distinct policy! You could advise him of this prior to him altering your meter.

Anyway if he goes ahead, from 12am to 3am will not even get your storage heaters warm and by 10am you will have no heat, but by the same token if yoiu don't have proper heat during the day/evening then he may be breaching Health & Safety regulations and then you can nail him on that count anyway. I suggest you phone H & S and check on this aspect as if he goes ahead he will be committing two offences.

If you are paying for the electric he has no right to alter the E7 times. If possible get this alteration in writing from him by stating that as it is not in the lease, he cannot make these sort of changes. Indicate that if you get it in writing you may sign it. Pretend to be a bit thick and willing and once you have it in writing you will have him over a barrel! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again, thanks for the advice.

 

I have just realised that he was suppose to give us an Energy perfomance certificate, which he has not done.

 

sounds like he might be in a bit of trouble.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...