Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
    • I am extremely apprehensive about burning our files.... I do not know why, so it is becoming an endless feedback loop. Scared to pull the trigger to speak in the desire not to mess up my file. 
    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Group after me for debt from back in 2007 !!


Mady
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4061 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Agreed they do this to make you think the account has been passed to a ''higher authority''.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 194
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi again guys,

 

Thanks again for your kind advise.

 

I received a letter from Scotcall today talking about home visits! slightly worried as I never been in this position before! any ideas where this going to end? I have a year to go till the Debt becomes barred (6 years)

 

Any ideas?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore snotcall, send them nothing.

 

If any random stranger does turn up on your private property then you can simply laugh at them and tell them to clear off or you'll call the police.

 

They are debt collectors, they have exactly zero legal powers to be going around knocking on peoples doors, so don't be worried, keep a camera by the front door too, and take their mug shot, laugh then slam the door in their face.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
ps when was your last payment/acknowledgement if not since 2007 then its close to being stat barred

Hi Mikey,

 

I am actually a bit confused if the 6 years kicks from the date of the default (13/12/2007) or last payment i made to T-mobile 19/05/2007?! which one of the two dates?

 

I have sent few letters out to lowell offering them F&F and i believe i didn't acknowledge the debt.

Kindly let me know guy so I can prepare myself

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is your last financial 'use' of the account

 

have you ever had any discount letters?

 

if so, safe to ignore

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is your last financial 'use' of the account

 

have you ever had any discount letters?

 

if so, safe to ignore

 

dx

 

What you mean?

 

I last use the mobile until May 2007 before they cut the line! I received letteres from lowell asking for setting up DD & I replied with F&F letters every time.

 

Last bill payment was in April 2007.

 

kindly advise.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm part of my msg missing.......

 

SB is from last use of the account so in your case payment.

 

IMHO i would be ignoring lowlife

 

have you ever had any discount letters?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm part of my msg missing.......

 

SB is from last use of the account so in your case payment.

 

IMHO i would be ignoring lowlife

 

have you ever had any discount letters?

 

dx

 

Yes 2 offering 15% discount!

Link to post
Share on other sites

safe to ignore me thinks

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mikey,

 

I am actually a bit confused if the 6 years kicks from the date of the default (13/12/2007) or last payment i made to T-mobile 19/05/2007?! which one of the two dates?

 

I have sent few letters out to lowell offering them F&F and i believe i didn't acknowledge the debt.

Kindly let me know guy so I can prepare myself

 

It will be statute barred from the point where you did not pay the amount due. If you made a payment on 19/5/007, I am guessing this was payment for the April statement. You then defaulted on the May statement and therefore I would think the account would be statute barred sometime in June 2013.

 

So it is up to you what you do. The default date is wrong on your credit record, if it is showing as 13/12/07. Once you start sending letters to Lowells or other DCA's, it does mean that they will spend more time researching your account and in my opinion there is more chance they would take enforcement action.

 

Are you happy that there is a debt and with the amount ? If not then you should think about making a complaint to T-Mobile and to help with this perhaps send them an SAR.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok guys,

 

I just went through my info I have, I requested a SAR back in 2010 already and the bill was just over 1K (call made from abroad that's why such a high bill!!) and of course T-mobile/lowell had to add around 275 to cancel the contract!

 

Just reliased that the exact last payment was made on 15th March 2007, when I requested a SAR from T-mobile it came with all the bills and memo records which shows that they sold the debt to lowell on 24/03/2007 and they suspended the account on 27/03/2007.

 

so what SB date exactly? and what letter to send to them when SB is on?

 

thank you ever so much guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

15/4/7 about

 

i'd sit tight

 

 

did you say you've had discount letters?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go by the last date of payment 15/3/07, as you already appear to be in arrears by then, hence them selling the debt so quickly to Lowell. So SB date would be 16/3/13. Strange that the account was not suspended until after they had sold the account on to Lowells. Think the suspension date is probably wrong.

 

So if you are going to sit this out until the debt is SB, then respond with the SB letter in regard to any debt collection letters received from April 2013 onwards

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?408-Letter-sent-when-debt-is-statute-barred

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go by the last date of payment 15/3/07, as you already appear to be in arrears by then, hence them selling the debt so quickly to Lowell. So SB date would be 16/3/13. Strange that the account was not suspended until after they had sold the account on to Lowells. Think the suspension date is probably wrong.

 

So if you are going to sit this out until the debt is SB, then respond with the SB letter in regard to any debt collection letters received from April 2013 onwards

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?408-Letter-sent-when-debt-is-statute-barred

 

Yes I found that strange too, would they remove it from my credit records after I send them the SB letter? or do i have to send a different letter to Experian asking them to remove the default?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes twice offering 15% off but just ignored them. what does that got to do with it?

 

 

means there is something up with the debt

 

another good pointer for you

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

means there is something up with the debt

 

another good pointer for you

 

dx

 

I am sorry but I am bit thick what you mean by "means there is something up with the debt"?

 

do you mean because soon will SB that's why they offering the discount?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I found that strange too, would they remove it from my credit records after I send them the SB letter? or do i have to send a different letter to Experian asking them to remove the default?

 

Once the debt is clearly statute barred, then raise a complaint about the default date being wrong. You could do this via Experian or with the DCA compliance department that is dealing with the debt. If you contact Experian, they will raise a query with the debt owner, so you could do it that way.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry but I am bit thick what you mean by "means there is something up with the debt"?

 

do you mean because soon will SB that's why they offering the discount?

 

could be that

 

or they know its not a viable court case

 

typically though they dont offer discounts on almost sb debts.

 

should be in the sar if you look hard

 

PENALTY charges?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go by the last date of payment 15/3/07, as you already appear to be in arrears by then

 

I wasn't in Arrears when I made the payment on 15/03/2007 its the few days between the payment and when they sold the debt. ( my grandad passed away I had to make phone calls on my way to Trinidad and from there) I used my phone a lot in that small period!

Link to post
Share on other sites

could be that

 

or they know its not a viable court case

 

typically though they dont offer discounts on almost sb debts.

 

should be in the sar if you look hard

 

PENALTY charges?

 

dx

 

No Pens

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wasn't in Arrears when I made the payment on 15/03/2007 its the few days between the payment and when they sold the debt. ( my grandad passed away I had to make phone calls on my way to Trinidad and from there) I used my phone a lot in that small period!

 

I think some of your dates may be wrong. I doubt that Lowell bought this debt in March 07, so near to your last payment to T-Mobile, when there was not a period of arrears. Also it is really odd for T-Mobile to terminate the account within 2 weeks of your last payment.

 

Suggest that you have a look through the paperwork again.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...