Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wait until you get a refund from the purchaser before accepting anything else. Please will you post up the text of the email that you received.  Make sure that you look after the text that you received from the purchaser
    • I’ve just received a letter from a debt collection agency called Intrum about an old Halifax credit card debt, they have never been in touch before and the letter says that because I have failed to contact them they are passing on to a company called Resolvecall who specialise in home visits. This debt is from about 14 years ago when I got into some financial trouble, I had a default on file but that dropped off around 4 years ago. Is there anything I can do with this as I don’t really want people coming to my house, thanks in advance? 
    • Just wanted to check if anyone knows, I'm in the process of retrieving the transcript. There was no time frame given in the appeal judges directions, does this mean none applies or is there an unwritten timeframe that applies as a default for these things? 
    • I left a trustpilot review and P2g have emailed me with the obligatory apology and have refunded the postage costs and are will to give £10 extra pre pay as a good will gesture. However,  as i wrote this the Buyer has just txt.me.to say they have received the parcel !  So obviously im now going.to suggest that she pays via Paypal ... I rang her this morning to see if it had arrived but she said she was on holiday and there was someone in her house she would have to contact to see if it had arrived which she obviously has ... So now i know its been delivered i cant go for P2g But i Can accept the exta £10 ...
    • The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go.com Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper via the Defendant's service containing which contained two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with  under  tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was The Defendant informed me that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks I was informed by the courier that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. The Claimant did not purchase the Defendant's insurance policy as requiring people to pay extra for rights already guaranteed under the consumer rights act 2015 is contrary to section 57 and 72 and therefore unenforceable. The Claimant rejected the Defendant's standard compensation offer. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   By failing to ensure the safe delivery of the Claimant's parcel the Defendant breached section 49 of the CRA 2015.   AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS £370.00 being the value of the lost goods £xx.xx being the price of shipping and interest pursuant to s69 cca 1984.   See what BF thinks but I think something like this is better. Remember you are suing P2G not evri.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Another complaint about carcraft, warranty and practices.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3729 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

there is a new thread in this forum

 

the user posted at the end of this one too.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?291358-complaint-about-carcraft-warranty

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Carcraft Customer Service Manager

Hi dx

 

Sorry for posting my number! we've been ok to in the past!

 

Thanks

Linz

 

there is a new thread in this forum

 

the user posted at the end of this one too.

 

dx

Edited by Carcraft Customer Service Manager
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi linzi I have a major problem with a particular NAC insurance... can you pm me with your telephone number and I can explain...

 

thanks fergal

Only direct action by the masses will work....

 

Look at all successes they have never come from negotiation!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Carcraft Customer Service Manager

Hi Fergal

 

I will PM you my number - look forward to hearing from you.

 

Thanks

Linzi

Link to post
Share on other sites

it would be nice to 'know' what happens on all these enquiries

 

please be aware CAG is not only here as a conduit to help please

[but objectively info should not go off being visable]

 

but many people browse without ever posting looking for how to resolve issue

 

taking things off to the phone and leave threads just dead with no conclusion or exp ABOUT WHAT THE ISSUE WAS AND HOW IT WAS RESOLVED is NOT what we are here for

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Carcraft Customer Service Manager

Hi dx

 

Fergal has not yet contacted me, but when he does I will ask him to update the thread.

I understand all you say, but first i need to go through DPA and understand the complaint to see what i can do to help resolve - hope this is ok.

I want as many helpful comments on the threads as you.

 

Thanks

Linzi

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

To Linzi,

 

Back 3/4 years ago you helped me with a warranty that at the time of sale I didn't need or ask for but sold to me under the pretence of "unable to get the full loan, this is a top up loan".

 

Now 2 months ago (I know its been 2 months but this has been playing on my mind) I part ex the old car, cleared the old finance off and took out a new car again with you but again I was sold a warranty under the same pretence as before didn't need it or want it but I was pushed into it.

 

Can this warranty be cancelled and payments refunded?

 

Regards,

 

Brian

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Carcraft Customer Service Manager

Hi BrianAll Extended Guarantee's can be cancelled within 30 days as stated in your Drive Happy Booklet. What is your current vehicle registration number?ThanksLinzi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Carcraft Customer Service Manager

Hi BrianThank you, i have responded.Linzi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Just an update, Linzi as usual did a great job and cleared up my problems and questions without fail.

 

My regards to Linzi and hence this thread is now closed.

 

Regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I take it the warranty was cancelled and payments refunded ? :)

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Carcraft Customer Service Manager

Hi MaroondevoNo, it was purely a misunderstanding, I will leave it for Brian to explain if he so wishes.ThanksLinzi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MaroondevoNo, it was purely a misunderstanding, I will leave it for Brian to explain if he so wishes.ThanksLinzi

 

Thanks Linzi,

 

Thought it may be beneficial to other users knowing the outcome :)

 

But if it was purely an misunderstanding, no explanation needed.

 

Regards,

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Carcraft Customer Service Manager

absolutely agree, however due to the personal details involved in this matter I would like to leave the ball in Brian's court in this instance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

absolutely agree, however due to the personal details involved in this matter I would like to leave the ball in Brian's court in this instance.

 

No problem :)

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Sorry.... Update.

 

 

It was my mistake as I thought an extra payment being made was for a warranty but in fact it was indeed a payment for a top up loan not a warranty.

 

 

Again thanks to Linzi for her help and sorry for my late response.

 

 

Regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...