Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called. I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job. However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still haven't sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

car insurance cancelled and had an accident


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4891 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i had an accident on the 19th nov a woman crashed into me however my insurance esure recovered the car as it was undrivable.

 

they took it to an accident place were the assesors looked at the damage and said it was a total loss (write off) so the car was sat in their compound.

 

the assesors got in contact with the insurace and told them it was a total loss and sent pics.

 

this is when the trouble starts.. the insurance have said cos there was a spoiler on the car and alloys wheels which were not factory fitted they have cancelled my insurance.

 

so here i am with cancelled insurance, and also had to get the car out of the compound and pay the bill myself. and a smashed up car on my driveway.

 

rang the insurance to find out what was going on and after a month of calls letters (me to them) cctv footage, photographs of the accident and also a witness to be told because the insurance has been cancelled they can no longer help me and i should get a solicitor...

 

both me and the woman who crashed into me are/was both insured by esure which makes it that little bit more complicated.

 

my question is now what do i do? i have already been to a no win no fee solicitor for my injurys as i was 22 weeks pregnant at the time of accident and also had my 2 young boys in the car with me.

 

i have pics of the actual accident and also there was a witness... however the other driver has told the insurance that i pulled out of a side street into her and there was no witnesses?? i have cctv footage to prove i never came out of the side street she is saying... the cctv shows me coming out of a side street 500 yards up the road from the one she said

 

what do i do now ? and what should i expect? have i got a case??

 

i have tried to ring my solicitor but they are closed until 4th jan :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 different aspects to deal with.

 

1) You need to pursue the claim with the solicitors help against the third party driver, It does not matter that they were also Insured by Esure. Get together as much information as possible, which you already appear to have done. The solicitor will submit the case to Esure and if Esure don't accept liability on behalf of the third party driver, then this could end up in court. This might take many months to resolve, so you also need to pursue point 2)

 

2) Complaint against your Insurers Esure for voiding the policy and refusing the claim. Find out from the cars manufacturers whether the spoiler and alloy wheels were factory fitted or sold with them as standard. Many companies will include these as standard and they are therefore not considered modifications. If the manufacturers or dealers are not much help, guides such as Parkers may reveal what extras were included with the car. Once you have the information, make a formal complaint in writing to Esure. Esure have up to 8 weeks to resolve before you can pass to the FOS, but make sure Esure are aware that you will look to get the FOS involved.

 

Proceed with this as above. Don't start thinking about what could happen in different senarios. It actually helps that both cars were Insured with Esure, so that they will know what the score is with both policies. If you have a complaint ongoing with your policy and are pursuing a claim against the third parties policy, this will give Esure plenty to deal with. There is no way any poster to this site can advise you whether you were at fault or not for the accident. You can work this out for yourself, with your own diagrams for the accident and with reference to the highway code.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your help i have found out that the spoiler and alloys did not come as standard so im a bit stuck as to what happens with that now?

 

So did you buy the car from new or second hand ?

 

If it was a second hand buy, most people would not know.

 

The FOS do have policy positions on this. From what have I have read, the FOS would view this as an inadvertent non disclosure, expecting the Insurers to deal with the claim as normal. But would require you to pay the relevant additional premium for having these car modifications included.

 

When you make the complaint to Esure about the cancellation of your policy, tell them that unless they reverse their decision, you will ask the FOS to review this. Advise them that any non disclosure of the spoiler and alloys was totally inadvertent on your part.

 

I would find it difficult to believe that Esure would not have insured the car had they known about the spoiler and alloys. It would normally only be in this situation that an Insurer would have cancelled the policy, on the basis that had they known about the risk, they would not have provided cover.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

the car was 9 years old when i bought it the car is a citroen saxo 1.4 westcoast... however the 1.6vtr is exactly the same car but bigger engine

 

just that i have now found out that the 1.4 westcoast didnt come with spolier and alloys as standard. it was my 1st car so how am i supposed to know the difference?

 

esure have said that they wouldnt have insured me if they had known about the alloys and spoiler as they class these as modifications?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does seem like a very tight underwtiting policy to not offer any increased cover for these mods? then again it is a Saxo. Esure would have to prove to the FOS they would not touch your car. It's not clear cut as only Esure could confirm this.

Worth a challenge I'd say, you have nothing to loose. What UB67 said upstairs may be the winning formula.

good luck, let us know what the outcome is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks very much for your help ;) and can i just ask what you meant by saying "but then again it is a saxo" ??? im confused as to what you mean?

 

as far as im aware a car is a car!!!?? does it being a saxo make any difference?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I don't want to come across as being rude. I drive a pretty average car.

A Saxo is a higher statistic for having a crash or being more attractive to theives than say a people carrier. Certain cars are more attractive to certain demographics, they appeal more to a younger driver who on whole have more accidents, I'm not commenting,or being an old (ish) fuddy duddy, it's just the way it goes. Some insurers just don't want them on their books, insurance is a giant gamble.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ahh right i see. so obviously a saxo isnt a car to have then??!!

 

just received a letter this morning off ESURE... they are asking for 318.00 off us (which sounds like the rest of the policy for this year)

 

do we actually have to pay this to them?

 

they have said if it isnt paid it will go to debt collections?? :-x:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would write to them disputing any amounts owed on the policy as you have a on going dispute with them.

 

Also Sara it might be an idea to type 'Esure Complaints' into Google and see what it throws up, have there been similar situations of Esure getting out of paying claims. Send all letters Recorded.

 

 

ahh right i see. so obviously a saxo isnt a car to have then??!!

 

just received a letter this morning off ESURE... they are asking for 318.00 off us (which sounds like the rest of the policy for this year)

 

do we actually have to pay this to them?

 

they have said if it isnt paid it will go to debt collections?? :-x:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

ahh right i see. so obviously a saxo isnt a car to have then??!!

 

just received a letter this morning off ESURE... they are asking for 318.00 off us (which sounds like the rest of the policy for this year)

 

do we actually have to pay this to them?

 

they have said if it isnt paid it will go to debt collections?? :-x:-x

 

Think Esure have messed up here.

 

If they wouldn't cover the Saxo with the spoiler and alloys, then the policy should have been voided from inception of cover for this car and all premiums refunded.

 

If they have decided to cancel using the 7 days notice clause in the policy and are asking for the remaining premium, this means that they could be open to claim from yourself as well as the third party.

 

I think I would be sending a complaint by recorded delivery to Esures CEO asking what they are playing at. This is clearly a case of an inadvertent non disclosure of the spoiler and alloys, for which the FOS would take a dim view of the cancellation. These mods to the car have nothing to do with the claim loss event. The mods had no bearing on whether you had the accident or not.

 

Before you write, do a quote on Esures website to see if they would cover the car with the spoiler and alloys added. If they would cover, this is more ammunition to help with your complaint.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the amount is for the balance of the account and you pay it based on their request, they will have a very hard time voiding your insurance because by sending the letter requesting the balance they are in fact making the contract vaild again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the amount is for the balance of the account and you pay it based on their request, they will have a very hard time voiding your insurance because by sending the letter requesting the balance they are in fact making the contract vaild again.

 

Except that they have received or expect to receive a claim from the third party, so they want the premium paid. Under the RTA the Insurers would be liable to pay out to the third party, even if they voided the policy. So what they have decided to do is cancel the policy, but just refuse to pay their policholder for damage to their own vehicle.

 

I think I would be making the complaint first and then coming to an agreement to pay the premium if the Insurers review their decision.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

also they cancelled the insurance on the 1st dec... and we recived the cacelation letter 2 weeks later...

 

now when insurance is cancelld aint they supposed to give 7 days notice? as we had no notice the only way we knew they had cancelled it was becasue it never came out of the bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

also they cancelled the insurance on the 1st dec... and we recived the cacelation letter 2 weeks later...

 

now when insurance is cancelld aint they supposed to give 7 days notice? as we had no notice the only way we knew they had cancelled it was becasue it never came out of the bank.

 

Yes they have to give a minimum of 7 days notice in writing of the cancellation.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

i put no as i didnt know alloys and a spoiler were classed as modifications... how many cars come with alloys and spoilers as factory fitted these days?

 

 

all i wanted to know in this post was have i got a case were i will be able to claim for the car and my injurys or will it get thrown out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...