Dayglo's mission to get his life back!

[dayglo]

Do I sound like Rory Mcgarth!!!!!!

 

I don't know - who is Rory Mcgarth?

[aardvark the lecturer]

Hi busy boy!

 

Me too after reading all that!:o

 

You are so lucky to have a friend who can help you in this way!

 

Wxx

 

That's right, and Mr D should be reminded more often in my opinion

 

don't let him get more smug than he already is!

 

you should see 'the beard'

 

we went into town today to get our chinese visas, which is near the universities and he blended right into studentville and he's off watching some student-indie band tonight as well - I promise you he's still 15!

 

Listen Dude, don't diss the band, they rock......big time.

 

I'll tell my mum on you if you keep being nasty as well.

 

15.....with a beard???? lol....are you sure it's not a tuft?

 

I would like to confirm, for the avoidance of doubt, that the beard in question is in no way 'tufty'.

 

I just noticed, is the leery bearded face in the background Mr Aardvark??

 

Pete

 

No way, not leery enough, and the beards not as nice....

 

Of course chit chat is still ok here!

 

Posting in this thread is allowable provided that least one of the conditions listed in section 1.0 of Schedule 1.0 below are met.

 

Section 1.0

Schedule 1.0

1) The post makes someone, preferably dayglo, laugh or smile.

2) The post furthers dayglo's mission to get his life back

3) The post is complimentary to dayglo

4) The post is not about bringing down the CRAs, the government or other such activity

5) The post contains the majority of its words spelt correctly

6) The post contains other such comments demonstrating how much better at things Dayglo is compared to Aardvark the Lecturer

 

Section 2.0

1. Subject to Section 2(2) Any individual is entitled to post a notice requesting that posting by an individual member ceases in that it causes or is likely to cause Dayglo (or others as arbitrially chosen by Dayglo) to sigh, frown or smack their head on the table in irritation or anguish.

2. If any of the conditions described in pragraphs 1 to 4 of Section 1.0 are met then tough luck buster - Dayglo will waggle his finger in your general direction

 

I contend that this post is in accordance with the following rules,

 

1.1 - namely me

1.4 - nowhere in this post did I state that 'the man' needs to be taught a lesson, and therefore brought down.

1.5 - Any contentions that this is otherwise must be backed up with examples (so I can edit quietly them)

1.6 - Oh, maybe not that one, I wouldn't want to commit perjury....

 

[dayglo]

I like. I like it a lot. Good evening my friend. very nice!

[aardvark the lecturer]

I'm wondering if you intend to appoint a group/organisation to act as the advisory body who regulates the posting rules?

 

My fear is that although I understand the rules and arguments at present, there may be a new perception of them that muddles it all up....

[dayglo]

I have done - both Dayglo Pirates & Dayglo's gang take it in turns.

[aardvark the lecturer]

I demand their address('s) so I can complain and request clarification in the event of unfair finger-wagging....

[dayglo]

just a quick update, in terms of the overall 'mission' I reached another milestone today.

 

One of the defaults came to the end of it's natural life yesterday and dropped off my file as it had just passed it's 6 year anniversary.

 

So. My credit file is starting to look reasonable now. The one blot is the remaining default from vodafone.

 

No word yet from the courts regarding the statements sent 2 weeks ago.

 

It's likely I'll have to amend my PoC from the 'poor version' I started with that had 'consent' as the main issue to the updated argument concerning failure to comply with their obligations S.10(3) and arguing over whether or not the conditions described in Schedule 2 paragraph 6 are met or not.

[dayglo]

guess where JamesJ went after here?

 

MoneySavingExpert.com Forums - View Profile: JamesJones

[aardvark the lecturer]

lol

 

I'm tempted to go and register!!!!

[dayglo]

morning sir, you well?

[dayglo]

I have a sneaky suspicision that the banks (and others) are using secret codes to warn each other about certain customer behaviours and that they are using 'user defined' data fields within the various databases to do this.

 

 

for example, you may fix your file to reflect your improved credit status that you deserve, you still be declined credit though as someone has put a secret entry in your file that warns others that you have 'removed default via legal process' or other such.

 

I am certain that this is done via the 'notes' on your account via current accounts.

 

more investigation needed methinks if I' am to suceed in getting my life back

[Allyxia]

Sorry to sound dispondant but after reading that DTi report I m starting to feel my life is never gona get back!

 

I feel like the Gov is handing more power to the CRA not less!!!

 

And following our conversation last week Day aboutthe effects or a defaiult without a trail or appeal I cant ebleive they have this much power in the first place!

 

Anyway I relise this may have slightly gone off track off your thread and I apologise!!

 

Ive just woken up today very grumpy over the default and CRA issue!

[dayglo]

Sorry to sound dispondant but after reading that DTi report I m starting to feel my life is never gona get back!

 

I feel like the Gov is handing more power to the CRA not less!!!

 

And following our conversation last week Day aboutthe effects or a defaiult without a trail or appeal I cant ebleive they have this much power in the first place!

 

Anyway I relise this may have slightly gone off track off your thread and I apologise!!

 

Ive just woken up today very grumpy over the default and CRA issue!

 

no I agree - btw i think your post complies with the conditions described in section 1(2)!!!

 

There was another amazing story in the news last week that didn't get much coverage and the spin that was put on it was incredible.

 

"following the investigation by the competition commission into doorstep lending practices, conclusion 'no cap' on massive interest rates and credit reference agenices must be given access to customer account details to build a 'better picture' of the UK's borrowing scene' :o

 

coupled with the report you mentioned - CRAs are 'loved' by the government (It's not pary specific either)

 

The CRAs will become even more powerful than ever before and that is not a good thing.

[aardvark the lecturer]

morning sir, you well?

 

I'm gradually recovering............head's stopped pounding now at least.

 

Sorry to sound dispondant but after reading that DTi report I m starting to feel my life is never gona get back!

 

I feel like the Gov is handing more power to the CRA not less!!!

 

And following our conversation last week Day aboutthe effects or a defaiult without a trail or appeal I cant ebleive they have this much power in the first place!

 

Anyway I relise this may have slightly gone off track off your thread and I apologise!!

 

Ive just woken up today very grumpy over the default and CRA issue!

 

hmmm.....checking rules........

 

1.1 Nope, no-one smiling

1.2 Definately not

1.3 Not specifically

1.4 Borderline on this one

 

 

Oh Oh,

 

definately doesn't meet 1-4, you could argue under 1.5 but Schedule 2 clearly gives precedent to 1-4 as the prime conditions.

 

If 'Dayglo Pirates or Dayglo's gang' are watching you could be in trouble....

[dayglo]

sorry aardvark, in that it informs us of our enemies intentions and, as you know, information is power (reminds me - must send another letter to the ico), it could be argued, and it has, that 1(2) is relevant here!

[Allyxia]

I have a cat on my shoulder (dont ask) which could be my version of a parrot therefore Im a pirate Arrr Arrr Arrr

 

Gawd Im finally losing it now!!!!

 

But back to what we were discussing - there is no way over my dead body are any CRA having access to my financail dealings I will stick my cash under my bed if thats the cash - its typical of this government (however I stress - I no affilation to any of the so called muppets in westminster - and I have no doubt that they would all be bringing this in), futher to the Dti report it states that it is to do with reponsible lending due to a minority of people - what is really scary is the blanketing of legisaltion due to the minortity that affects the majority of poeple!!!

 

Also how they slipping this under the back door is unreal can you imagine how many other pieces of legislation are going through that we havent come across!!

 

ally Mad ally gone bad!!!!

[aardvark the lecturer]

Right,

for the purpose of clarity, here are the original rules....

 

new rules!

 

Posting in this thread is allowable provided that least one of the conditions listed in section 1.0 of Schedule 1.0 below are met.

 

Section 1.0

Schedule 1.0

1) The post makes someone, preferably dayglo, laugh or smile.

2) The post furthers dayglo's mission to get his life back

3) The post is complimentary to dayglo

4) The post is not about bringing down the CRAs, the government or other such activity

5) The post contains the majority of its words spelt correctly

6) The post contains other such comments demonstrating how much better at things Dayglo is compared to Aardvark the Lecturer

 

Section 2.0

1. Subject to Section 2(2) Any individual is entitled to post a notice requesting that posting by an individual member ceases in that it causes or is likely to cause Dayglo (or others as arbitrially chosen by Dayglo) to sigh, frown or smack their head on the table in irritation or anguish.

2. If any of the conditions described in pragraphs 1 to 4 of Section 1.0 are met then tough luck buster - Dayglo will waggle his finger in your general direction

 

- btw i think your post complies with the conditions described in section 1(2)!!!

 

hmmm.....checking rules........

 

1.1 Nope, no-one smiling

1.2 Definately not

1.3 Not specifically

1.4 Borderline on this one

 

 

Oh Oh,

 

definately doesn't meet 1-4, you could argue under 1.5 but Schedule 2 clearly gives precedent to 1-4 as the prime conditions.

 

If 'Dayglo Pirates or Dayglo's gang' are watching you could be in trouble....

 

sorry aardvark, in that it informs us of our enemies intentions and, as you know, information is power (reminds me - must send another letter to the Information Commissioners Office), it could be argued, and it has, that 1(2) is relevant here!

 

Right, lets remind ourselves of the original post...........

 

Originally Posted by Allyxia

Sorry to sound dispondant but after reading that DTi report I m starting to feel my life is never gona get back!

 

I feel like the Gov is handing more power to the CRA not less!!!

 

And following our conversation last week Day aboutthe effects or a defaiult without a trail or appeal I cant ebleive they have this much power in the first place!

 

Anyway I relise this may have slightly gone off track off your thread and I apologise!!

 

Ive just woken up today very grumpy over the default and CRA issue!

 

 

In response to your assertions that 1(2) is relevant:

 

There is no new information in this post, and therefore does not inform us of anything.

 

It does not discuss or seek to understand the behaviour of 'our enemies', but simply states the defendants own state of mind at the time.

 

I see no grounds that this post in any way furthered your mission to "get your life back".

 

Case ruled in favour of Mr Aarvark.

[dayglo]

yeah but I like her!

[aardvark the lecturer]

There is no provision for that in the rules........

[aardvark the lecturer]

Dayglo, Go back to willows abbey thread now, and read the last post.

[dayglo]

well if there was, I suspect Ally is a non-conformist rule breaker anyway (ring any bells? remind you of anyone?) so any rules i set, would just be seen as a tempting challenge.

[Allyxia]

:o Blush

 

Hey I never put that smiley there I cliked the blushing one not the shocked one!!!!!!

[aardvark the lecturer]

It's a conspiracy!

[Guest willowb]

yeah but I like her!

me too!

 

Anyone gonna make me a cup of tea?

 

I'm going to drink it whilst I let all this sink in.......should we refer to the CRAs as 'Big Brother'???:o

 

 

Wxxx

[dayglo]

me too!

 

Anyone gonna make me a cup of tea?

 

I'm going to drink it whilst I let all this sink in.......should we refer to the CRAs as 'Big Brother'???:o

 

 

Wxxx

 

ahhhh - I like you too!