Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Misuse of My Data by Motability (probable ID theft/Benefit Fraud)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 194 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Strange one here-

Got through post a Insurance Policy taken out in my name, address date of birth etc for a Motability car i do not own or have ever seen.

Rang the insurance co , direct line and asked what's going on? they referred me back to Motability.

Motability Rang me, and confirmed actually insisted i was the registered keeper of a vehicle on the DVLA and their systems, i might add here i am not disabled or receive benefits etc

I obviously went a little crazy and had to call police etc as Motability suggested thinking some form if ID fraud or someone pretending to be  me using my details.

Then later that day it transpires and Motability admit that they used my data to do all this and i've had insurance policies with RSA and direct line since Sept 2021 and have been the registered keeper of the vehicle belonging to someone else since sept 2021.

You can imagine how mad i'm getting now, having dealt with calls to action fraud, police etc. 

I've done a formal complaint so i may escalate to ICO,  Motability quite rightly seem to be absolutley treading on eggshells when dealing with me and 'consulting' their top legal team.

So they have taken my identity, breached GDPR, given personal information to many organisations, DVLA, insurance bureaus etc, so you can imagine the level of risk i have been exposed to with all this stuff in my name by taking my data. Not to mention someone has driven around in a car, not registered to them uninsured for two years-who is unaware.

They are asking what i think i would look for in compensation etc? which i know can be awarded even without financial loss under breach of GDPR.

But i don't know what to suggest- i', still angry, this is major breach and mistake by a large organisation, of which i don't know full repercussions yet. I don't know how far my informations gone, how or why this has happened plus still haven't confirmed to me they have corrected (removed) my name from things.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you sent a subject access request?

I think this is the first thing I would do in order to understand the full extent of this data processing breach

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you are certainly entitled to compo, it's where that info came from is going to be the crux of everything here going forward., i suspect this is a serious multiwinged  benefit fraud case it cant be anything else so thats where Motability got involved, these scammers get the cars and then sell them on or backdoor rent them out .

it could be that they might have to be a little careful here in a way, which is why you might be slightly getting 'the run around'. if its someone impersonating you, then they dont at this point obviously want too tip them off and the authorities will need to be involved, you've also got to look at this might not be the only example of said person doing such things, what else have they done.. i could be guessing but worthy to bear-in-mind.

if its just a case of a Motability mistake, god knows where did they get your info from, cant see them being able to just do that somehow i suspect this is benefit fraud, and there is more to it than you know yet or might ever know

ping @BankFodder

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing I should add is that in an action for breach of the data protection act, unless you can show financial loss and/or distress associated with that financial loss, then you can certainly claim for distress on its own – But, what distress have you suffered?

You haven't known about this at all over the two years that it has been happening. It hasn't affected your life in any way. You could only start calculating any kind of distress from the time that you came to know of it.

How long ago was that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Misuse of My Data by Motability (probable ID theft/Benefit Fraud)

Yes will ask for SAR

my details would be on their system , as daughter had a Motab car over 10 yrs ago , and I’m point of contact 

but they confirmed nothing to do with daughters details - all been done on my name only 

as for affecting life

- that’s the thing ,

high insurance premiums

can’t use broker sites ,

always say have to ring in

- which never had before last 18 months 

and there should be no reason for this 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Start making an extremely detailed note of every instance or every way that this is affected you.

Start making it using a spreadsheet and keep on bringing it up to date every time you think of something.

Do it for all future events but also do it retrospectively as well.

If you have written evidence of events or incidents which have occurred then make sure you keep them carefully...

If you have had to supply extra information to company such as insurance companies etc then send them SAR's as well.

 

 

Keep a well ordered and structured file on it all so that it all becomes easy to access if you need it later

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update - complaints dept called and said handing over to legal as I had made a SAR request -

so

closing complaint and leaving with legal who have 30 days to make a response - 

I assured them I need full answers to how a car could be picked up when my documents were required for collection. Etc - and will take this further 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

have you contacted DWP regarding how PIP has been successfully applied for using your details?

as you cant get a free mutability car without it.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i think they should be alerted as if the car has been gotten through the Motability scheme whereby a PIP award has been used to pay for it its fraud or ID theft.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok good so at least benefit fraud is not involved. 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - although raises more questions 

to apply and collect car , need driving licence , award letter , PIN number sent to your address 

 

I have no evidence of I’d fraud anywhere else and not lost anything important -doc wise 

so how can car be applied for, registered and collected in my name , address and date of birth and award letter( when there is no pip for me)  ?

I guess I can only wait for SAR for more pieces of the puzzle 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well to be honest i cant believe its just a simple case of motobility clicking on the wrong name when allocating the car. something is very fishy here that's not been spotted.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so this goes back to 2018!

when the 1st car ran to the 3yrs limit, it was replaced with another

it gets weirder and weirder.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not to mention all my details and address and email! are correct on this doc so why have i never received an email or post on these matters, how has it been intercepted ?

im not even named driver on the first car in 2018 , who can have a car for someone else and not be named driver 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly thats all possible under the Motability scheme.

my neighbours daughter is MS, nothing is in her name bar the PIP award which pays for it monthly .

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update - 

did dsar to dvla too 

and through the post this morning get another insurance policy for the same car taken out again ! I’m my details with direct line starting 18/9/2023 - can’t make it up

these  people used my details again reignited policy - I’ve got to get them to stop ! how ?

- and I have sent another additional complaint letter about this, this morning .
 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mentioned ICO earlier, has that string been pulled yet?

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

imho as its now been discovered this dates back several years, i cant see any harm in getting the ico onboard now nor the FOS and they will advise themselves if they can get involved at this stage ... me thinks they both will, ID Theft is a serious matter and until proven it's not, i suspect they both will want to get onboard swiftly.

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update -

got a letter form motability legals for the complaint - still awaiting DSAR

basically they say , no data breach, as I was appointed for my daughter many years ago, my details overwritten onto policies with someone who has similar name . But this is not a breach as because when I was appointee they were allowed to share my details with other organisations under T&C

but please have £250 for inconvenience blah Blah

im sorry , it is a breach , they had no consent to apply all my personal details to two vehicles i know nothing about with DVLA - exposing me as a registered keeper 

no right or consent to give my details to multiple insurance policies - and misused by data

im obviously going to now escalate to ICO and refuse £250 

I shall also respond with a letter before action , for the repeated breaches under the legislation

obv trying to rob me off currently 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...