Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • For the moment do nothing, never appeal, wait for a letter before action, ignore all the tripe they send you other than that.
    • as another of farages faragit reformatory boy shows his true colours Ian Gribbin, the party's candidate in Bexhill and Battle claimed * ' the country would be "far better" if it had "taken Hitler up on his offer of neutrality" instead of fighting the Nazis in World War Two. err tell that to the russians - who did .. * said people should  “exorcise the cult of Churchill and recognize that in both policy and military strategy, he was abysmal”. * Praised Russian president Vladimir Putin as he: "understands the bonds that create more stable societies; the hypocrisy of the West is preposterous as we stare in the face daily the enormous economic equalities created by our deluded neo liberal ideas" and "if only the West had politicians of his class".   * 'women were the "sponging gender" and should be "deprived of health care". * "Men pay 80% of tax – women spend 80% of tax revenue. On aggregate as a group you only take from society. Less complaining please from the 'sponging gender'." - Wonder what his momma thinks of that?   On being caught out, cribbin initially refused to comment before belatedly and weakly 'apologising' A Reform spokesman said the comments were “written with an eye to inconvenient perspectives and truths”. Chairman Tice said “We’re really pleased with all candidates." Leader Farage seemed to think the greens vetting OUT and suspending 20 unsuitable candidates was a 'bigger problem' than reform not only leaving **** the unsuitable in, but also being apologists for them     Reform candidate says UK should have ‘taken Hitler’s neutrality offer’ WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK He also praised Russian president Vladimir Putin and described Winston Churchill as ‘abysmal’   Reform UK candidate apologises over Hitler neutrality comments WWW.BBC.CO.UK Ian Gribbin says his grandparents were "Russian Jews fleeing persecution" and his comments were taken out of context.  
    • do you ultimately want to keep the car?
    • Thank you!    It was bought on my debit card    
    • Hi. Welcome to CAG. How was the car purchased?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BB v The Leeds Losers, experian, Freemans.com, Call credit, Moorcroft, and HBOS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3867 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm glad the Leeds Loosers haven't come my way.... they sound eve stupider than some of the other DCAs, but then they are all stupid to 'create' this industry which only brings misery to people rather than 'helps them get more credit by paying their bills on time'....

 

One day the whole lot will be wiped out... (and that includes the 'invented' links they love...)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a letter of apolology. Going to frame it :)

 

Can't wait to have a little fun with them soon though :)

 

Oh, and they guy that signed the letter wrote:

 

"Once again I would like to thank you for bringing this matter to our attention and as I believe we have now reached an amicable resolution, I will be closing your complaint. If for any reason you do not believe the matter to be resolved, please come back to me and I will re-open your file."

 

Resolved, is he 'avin a laugh? Eight weeks formal complaints procedure again lowlifes, freemans and experian lol...Then straight to TS, the OFT and the ICO :) And then, if that doesn't sort it, a nice N1 naming tham all as co defendants :)

 

And there was me a few weeks ago whinging that I wasn't having fun with any DCAs...Let the games commence :)

Edited by babybear39
missed a bit
Link to post
Share on other sites

Allegedly, they don't need my permission to view my CRA, even after a letter from them dated 8th October stating that they were closing the file and that it was a mistake between them and freemans.

 

Strange then that the guy that I just spoke to was viewing my CRF!

 

Need help with an N1 please.

 

OOOO, are they gonna wish they never sent a stoopid letter to me!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok folks. I have calmed down enough to start the ball rolling on this.

 

Checked experian when I recieved the letters and all was fine. Checked yesterday and experian have done a strange thing to my CRF. They've suddenly decided to completely change my previous address??? It now appears that I didn't live at my previous address???

 

This is way too much of a coincidence and I will be contacting them on Monday. They also have an address on my file that I've NEVER lived at! Cheeky...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear oh dear! Incorrect info on your CRF, certainly time to exhaust their complaints procedure and have the ICO do a thorough investigation of these imbeciles.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok, where's the lowlife fan club?

 

Time to have fun 'cos they've now put TWO...Oops! Make that FIVE entries on my CRF!!!

 

I'm staring at it now in utter disbelief that they, experian and freemans would be so stupid!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had an email from experian this morning stating that they've contacted idiots inc. requesting that they advise the removal of their searches.

 

'Tis a bit strange because most people get stroppy emails but this one wasn't. Wonder if our freinds in leeds, experian and freemans are reading this thread :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No doubt it has been looked at.:smile:

would have thought that ..JAMES CRT...

would have posted by now,offering to resolve your "concerns"

 

I gave them a HUGE chance but they didn't take.

 

I calculate 3 X at least £1000 and an ICs fine of 'guess' a number', maybe inprisonment for the guilty party whether it be one person or the three companies. Furguson V British Gas Trading comes to mind :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oops! I'm selling myself short...

 

5 X £1000 for indiots inc. markers on my CRF

 

1 X £1000 for freemans giving them the wrong info.

 

1 X £1000 for experian registering it all :)

 

Total: Circa £7000+

 

Suing a DCA/OC and Experian - Priceless!

 

For everything else there's mastercard with an unenforceable CCA (JOKE stolen blase from FB).

Edited by babybear39
added a bit
Link to post
Share on other sites

Another letter of apology from Leeds STILL naming the OC as freemans.com lol...

 

There never was an OC as the account never existed ffs!

 

Still waiting for a letter from freemans to confirm this. They have suddenly seen the error of their ways since they refused to do so originally even though they knew the 'account' was a ghost :!:

 

Do they think that a piece of paper is going to stop me suing them?

 

They've told Experian to take off all the info. Whooptydoo!

 

Experian are going to put my adresses back to what they should be and they can't answer as to why that was tampered with!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...