Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Scampjet V HSBC


jumpjet
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6307 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone

 

After a reading some of the posts over the past week, it really brings it home to me how much the banks are making out of people. I have calculated that I have paid £2399.00 since 2001. I have sent my preliminary letter and schedule of charges and recieved a letter this morning saying they will reply again within 5 days after making investigations. This falls within my 14 day deadline.............I suppose this means that they are taking it seriuosly!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello everyone

 

After a reading some of the posts over the past week, it really brings it home to me how much the banks are making out of people. I have calculated that I have paid £2399.00 since 2001. I have sent my preliminary letter and schedule of charges and recieved a letter this morning saying they will reply again within 5 days after making investigations. This falls within my 14 day deadline.............I suppose this means that they are taking it seriuosly!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck, keep us updated :)

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - start a post in the HSBC forum if you haven't already - you'll get the best advice and support from fellow claimants in there!

Jeep (The Wife & I)

Halifax joint a/c (£3800 charges + £40 interest on charges over 11 years) - paid in full 23/06/06

Halifax joint a/c new charges £1100 - LBA sent 02/08/06

Halifax 2nd a/c (£1500 charges + £150 interest on charges) - partial payment received 13/07/06 (no s69 interest) - AQ filed 07/08/06 - Court awarded 50% of s69 interest (Bank didn't turn up!)

Halifax Visa (#1) Data Protection Act sent - statements arrived - £350 so far

Halifax Visa (#2) Data Protection Act sent - refunded £170

DONATE - Support this site, it supported you!

Follow the route: FAQs > Template Library > Parachute Account > Bank Forums > Spreadsheet

All advice given in good faith and without prejudice or liability, to be taken at your own risk!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fiddler.

 

I've just had a look down the index and look what I found.

 

THE H.S.B.C. forum. Just click the link......

Then start reading, starting with the FAQs.....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/

 

:rolleyes:

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Scampjet v HSBC. more advise please!

 

I have recieved another reply from HSBC stating basically that they are right and I am wrong. They are saying that the OFT ruling concerned only credit cards and that thier charges are justified. I have just dowloaded the lba template, but would like to know if there is anything else I should do before sending it and also, they say that I should continue to contact them via their internal complaints proceedure. should I do this aswell?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all! more advice needed please.

 

I have recieved a letter from HSBC and they say that their charges are fair and the OFT ruling applies only to credit cards. I have read in one section of this site ( can't remember which) that this is common. I am about to send the LBA letter to them but they are suggesting that I should take it to the next stage of complaint as per their internal complaints procedure. Should I do this aswell?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Scampjet

 

This is YOUR claim, YOU are in control here, NOT them. Stick to YOUR timetable and the proven method used by thousands of people on this site.

 

There is no need to do anything other than send in your LBA. Simple. The LBA is suffice and shows you mean business, don't waste your time and postage with internal complaints procedures.

 

I had a successful claim against HSBC in March so I can tell you personally that you mustn't be tricked into doing anything other than by playing by the CAG rules ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all,

 

Hsbc has made me an offer of £2000.00 2days after LBA 14 day period expired. They have given me 10 days to respond. the reason for thier offer is that they are mindful of the costs involved defending the claim should it proceed to court. ( though they are confident they will win if they do)!

 

They have sent a form to claim the money in the form of a statment that the claim has been settled. I assume from this offer, that should I proceed to court for the full sum of £2,880. that they think I will win.

 

However, £2000 is a good offer. But now I have another problem. They wish to cridit my HSBC account with the offer within 7 days of recieving the signed statment. But I want the account to be closed. We have a DMP in place and because the offered payment to the HSBC is less than the agreed monthly payment, they have not closed the account as we have requested them to, but are debiting the account for the monthly payments of our loan account from it. As the amount of the DMP is not enough to meet the payments they are applying a recall charge of £30 per month plus interest to the account. As this has been going on for a few months, the overdrawn balance on our current account is now £750.00. We believe they have not closed the account in order to keep applying charges, as if the account is in debit it cannot be closed. Are we right? We have written to them to accept the offer under the condition that the account is closed and are prepared to accept that some of the money is used to pay off the current account balance ( less charges & interest) so that it can be closed and have asked that the remainder be paid direct to us by cheque. We think that the banks offer to pay directly into our account is designed to ensure that they still have control and will demand that the money is paid off our loan, so that they do not have to accept the DMP. Our thinking is that if the current account is clear of debt, there is no reason for them not to accept the DMP. Do you think they will go for this? Also, as they have accepted payments into the account under the DMP are they still able to say that they do not accept the agreement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would write and accept the offer (should you not want the hassel of persuing the other 880 - however 880 is quite a sum and i'd be tempted to chase it all - after all it is yours!)

 

put in your letter that you require the funds to be paid in cheque madee out to you and under no circumstances do you wish to have it paid into your HSBC account - they should honor this and then you can still go for a DMP and do what you wish with the money

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
i would write and accept the offer (should you not want the hassel of persuing the other 880 - however 880 is quite a sum and i'd be tempted to chase it all - after all it is yours!)

 

put in your letter that you require the funds to be paid in cheque madee out to you and under no circumstances do you wish to have it paid into your HSBC account - they should honor this and then you can still go for a DMP and do what you wish with the money

 

Thanks for reply jo5eph,

 

I gave HSBC 7 days to respond to my request and said that I would settle upon reciept of funds..............Nothing yet though.........7 days up to day. Do you think they will be tied down to a timscale or will do things in thier own time? I,m wondering now if I,ve done the right thing! I don,nt want to go to court unless I have to!

Link to post
Share on other sites

:?: Has anyone recieved any money from hsbc after an offer to settle? I have heared nothing from then since and so i think it will have to go to court even though I accepted (conditionaly). Are they waiting for my next move?:confused:
Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR Part 19:

Representative parties with same interest 19.6 (1)Where more than one person has the same interest in a claim –

(a)the claim may be begun; or

(b)the court may order that the claim be continued,

 

by or against one or more of the persons who have the same interest as representatives of any other persons who have that interest.

 

 

Only 1 of you needs to be signatory to your claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Michael,

 

I have copied the info for filling in the N1. Is there any 'legal speak' I need to include in the breif details section on the front, or is it just a general statement?

 

And 3 copies of my charges schedule?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well I've done it now! .........Filed my N1 today.

 

I do hope it's not £120.00 wasted.

 

Apparently in my area (S.Wales) they have had so many claims of this nature that "if it does go as far as a hearing, It will probably not be held at my local court as they have designated a judge at Cardiff court for such cases!" I wish I could have claimed on-line though.......at the moment they are unable to process the claims for 10 days on average because of the backlog and sheer volume!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why couldn't you claim online? Was it just the delay?

 

All will be well, it might just take a little longer

 

Good luck

 

No.......................I hav'nt got a debit card anymore!...........HSBC took it away!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello all,

 

Had a letter 2 days after I told the bank I was on my way to town to serve papers. They phoned about current account balance, but when I told her my intentions and that the bank had acted contrary to thier own advice regarding debt ( we asked for every kind of help thier leaflets suggested and got turned down on the grounds that we had a managed loan) she replied...."oH!" and with a few more mumbles said thank you and hung up. the letters they sent were obviously put together in a hurry because they were in the same envelope and consisted of: one option to make reduced payments on our managed loan account for the duration but reserving the right to amend the agreement at any time and all the while applying interest. Or a reduction on our present payments but more that the first letter. including interest and amalgamating the current account balance with the present managed loan balance. effectively a new managed loan, in which we would have paid them twice the original debt by the time its finished. they also sent us 2 shiney new debit cards which they took off us in August! Needles to say I have returned all the agreements and debit cards. I find it interesting though that as we followed their own advice to the letter at first, before we heared about being able to re-claim charges, as soon as I mentioned serving papers at court.................they offer us a carrot. I can only assume it is to try to cover their mistakes! Anyway, recived notice of service today and their 14 days is up on 14th DEC. I will carry on reading various posts to glean more info on what happens next........But any more input from the experts will be welcome!

Link to post
Share on other sites

as you've probably gathered if you've read very many threads - when you receive your acknowledgment, it will state their "intend to defend fully" the claim. this then buys them another 14 days. but it also gives you the opportunity to get a name at dg and send them your schedule of charges. this has helped speed up the process in some cases - though not all. but surely worth a try. so, next thing to watch for is the service papers from the court and probably an acknowledgment. good luck. happy waiting - this can be gruelling at times - just keep reading to be infomed and maybe help some of the real newbies to get to where you are now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...