Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Contract question


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5015 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

Just a quick question really.

 

I had a t-mobile contract a few years ago and asked them to cancell it at the next renewal. However i keeping getting bills from them at about £35 a month and its now at the debt collectors for a few hundred. I've spoken with them and they say i said no such thing to them and i must pay it. Naturally i tell them where to go.

 

I just need to know... If i didn't sign a contract to renew it, are they legally allowed to continue charging me? Could i just ask the debt collector for the contract (which doesn't exist) to shut them up?

 

any help would be great.

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mobile contracts don't just end at the end of the minimum term, you need to terminate it. Have you any proof that you asked to terminate at the end of the minimum term?

 

If you have no proof that you requested to terminate you may be in a bit of the brown stuff :( Mobile contracts also report to credit reference agencies (the same way banks do if you don't pay bills!!)

 

So, moving forward how to handle this?

Never talk to the DCA over the phone. If they phone you refuse to go through security, tell them you are dealing with T-Mobile directly. If you hang up on them, they are on an automatic dialer and they won't call back until your number gets it's rotation again.

 

Deal with T-Mobile in writing. The following is a quote from their "Code of practice" which outlines the most effective way to lodge your complaint.

Complaint handling and alternative dispute resolution procedures

We hope that you will never have reason to complain about any aspect of our services. However, if there is

something you are not happy with you should contact Customer Services and we will seek to resolve any

complaint or query you may have. Customer Services can be contacted on telephone number 150 if

calling from your T-Mobile phone, or on 0845 412 5000 from a land line. We will aim to find an immediate

solution where possible; however, more complex complaints may take several working days or longer to

resolve. If, having contacted Customer Services, you feel that your complaint has not been addressed or

resolved, you have the right to ask for your complaint to be escalated to a Manager. If your complaint then

remains unresolved, you should follow the complaints procedure below.

T-Mobile complaints procedure:

Step 1. Put your complaint in writing and send it to the following T-Mobile address:

The Customer Resolutions Team

T-Mobile

6 Camberwell Way

Sunderland

Tyne and Wear

SR3 3XN

The letter must include:

A) Your name

B) Your address

C) Your T-Mobile account number and /or mobile telephone number

D) Details of your complaint

E) Your resolution requirements

F) A daytime contact telephone number

Step 2. T-Mobile will acknowledge receipt within 3 working days of receiving your letter.

Step 3. T-Mobile will provide a full written response to your complaint within 14 days of receipt of your

letter. Subject to point 4 below, the complaints procedure will be at an end.

Step 4. If the letter from T-Mobile makes an offer of settlement, or it includes a proposal to resolve your

complaint, you must respond to it in writing within 14 days of its issue, again addressed to The Customer

Resolutions Team.

Step 5. If you do not respond to the letter from T-Mobile within 14 days of its issue, the complaints

procedure shall be at an end. If you respond by accepting the offer of settlement or proposal to resolve

the complaint, T-Mobile shall within 7 days of receipt of your letter either:

n Reply to your letter acknowledging your rejection, upon which the complaints procedure shall be at an

end, or;

n Reply to your letter putting forward new proposals in respect to which the provisions of points 4

onwards above shall apply.

You may also obtain independent advice from the Citizens Advice Bureau, Consumer Advice Centre,

Trading Standards Departments or other telecoms user organisations recognised by the Secretary of

State. Whilst we are happy to work together with any of the above independent organisations, if you

decide you need their help to resolve your complaint, we would always recommend that you contact us

first as most problems can be resolved quickly this way.

If after discussion with T-Mobile you are still unhappy with any aspects of our services, we have

established, in consultation with the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, a straightforward and convenient

procedure for independent, dispute resolution. This process may be used where we are unable to resolve

your complaint after a period of 8 weeks from the date of your initial complaint has passed or if we write to

you at any time informing you that we cannot resolve the complaint.

If the amount you are claiming does not exceed £5,000, subject to consent by T-Mobile, you have the right

to put the dispute to this adjudication process.

Details of how to apply to the T-Mobile adjudication services can be obtained by writing to the legal

department at:

T-Mobile

Hatfield Business Park

Hatfield

Hertfordshire

AL10 9BW

Or by email to [email protected]

Alternatively, you can obtain further information directly from CISAS by writing to them at:

CISAS

c/o Dispute Resolution Services

The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators

12 Bloomsbury Square

London, WC1A 2LP

Website: http://www.arbitrators.org

Telephone: 0207 421 7432

Or by email to [email protected] or to [email protected]

 

Personally, I'd check my credit file for adverse information and also complain about that.

 

The more detail you can give them the better. What date and time did you call to cancel? What was the persons name? Things like this that you can remember will add weight to your complaint!

 

Keep us informed please :)

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your detailed response!

 

I feel i may be in a spot of bother then as i don't recall when it was that i requested the cancelation or the persons name or anything. I guess the only thing i have to work in my favor is that the contract has not been used for about 6 months. Not one single minute or text as i took out another contract when i asked them to cancel it before the renewal.

 

I have my phone set to automatically go to answer phone at the moment as i don't want to talk to them (its buchanan clarke + wells).

 

I just find it to be really dishonest of them to renew a contract without my consent. Whenever i have phoned them and been like WTF are you still charging me for?? they just say theres no record of me contacting them to ask for it to be canceled.

 

You think i should file a complaint with them then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just find it to be really dishonest of them to renew a contract without my consent. Whenever i have phoned them and been like WTF are you still charging me for?? they just say theres no record of me contacting them to ask for it to be canceled.

 

You think i should file a complaint with them then?

 

They didn't renew the contract they simply honoured the terms that you initially agreed with them which was that they would continue to provide service until they received notice of disconnection from you, you say you sent it, they say you didn't and they have no record of you making any such request so the contract remained active.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you phone to cancel? If so give them the date (as close as possible) as if someone accesses your account they generally leave notes or what is called a "Footprint" (which shows the date your account was accessed)

 

Ask them to listen to any calls made around whatever month (if you can narrow it down further, do so!). Defiantly worth a letter or 2, but if they dig their heals in you'd be in for a hard slog ahead to get them to remove it! (CISAS will generally need evidence that you canceled to uphold a complaint as such)

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, 'not using' the handset doesn't help in any way - becasue if the disconnected all contract phones that had not been used for 6 months or more not only would it affect their profitability, but alarm customers who make infrequent use or have them for emergency back up. Anyone in a contract MUST terminate if they want to depart. Some require written notice, others MAY accept this request over the phone, but it remains the customers responsibility to check that this request has been complied with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...