Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hoist/? Claimform 2008 abbey credit card 'debt'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2990 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

looks like your old sar was july 2010 not 11?

 

 

dx

 

when did you receive the NOA from 1st credit please

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 303
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok, here goes,

 

23.12.2009 - letter from first credit - final reminder demanding full amount (no NOAA)

 

Letter rcd from first credit inviting us to make a settlement offer - letter undated

 

12.01.2010 - letter fro. First credit - threat of legal proceedings if no payment made

 

21.10.2010 - letter from DHS asking us to make an offer of payment. (Hubby did make contact and they wanted £400 down payment before they would agree to payment plan)

 

Letter rcd from first credit inviting to make an offer to settle - letter undated

 

11.03.2010 - letter from first credit stating instalment default notice, ( we didn't set up a payment plan with first credit)

 

19.05.2010 - letter rcd from Connaught advising they were instructed by first credit to collect monies outstanding. Reserving the right to commence legal proceedings

 

28.05.2010 - letter rcd from Connaught 'despite numerous efforts to contact you etc' intend to review for legal action

 

08.07.2010 - cca request sent to Connaught enclosing the one pound fee

 

09.07. 2010 - wrote to Connaught advising that we are not corresponding with them and that we contacted santander direct

 

09.07.2010 -contacted Santander stating a repayment plan of 3% of the balance per month (no response or acknowledgement from Santander) - no payments made to them either

 

22.07.2010 - letter recd from wescot Notice of Debt Collection, demanding dull payment

 

06.08.2010 - letter from wescot final notice threat of legal proceedings

 

23.08.2010 - letter from nelson and co demanding payment within 10 days of date of letter to wescot

 

15.09.2010 - letter received from nelson and co offering a discount if we contact within 10 days

 

04.10.2010 letter from wescot threatening doorstep action

 

08.10.2010 - we write to wescot advising that we do not owe westcott any monies And asking them to prove liability to westcott

 

18.10.2010 - letter from wescot stating that we have raised a query and they will investigate

 

20.10.2010.- letter from wescot advising that they have been in touch with their client who has advised the we are making payments direct to them and advising that we should be making all payments to wescot. This in fact is a blatant lie as we have made NO payment to Santander at all!

 

19.11.2010 - another letter from wescot regarding doorstep collection

 

23.11.2010 - letter from nelson and co demanding full payment to wescot or repayment plan agreed then legal proceedings will follow

 

24.11.2010 - SAR sent to Santander enclosing the ten pound stat fee

 

06.12.2010 - letter from wescot advising doorstep collection

 

17.12.2010 - response with SAR pack from Santander. No copies of statements just screen shots and an unsigned cca

 

29.12.2010 - letter from credit security demanding full payment or threat of CCJ. in capital letters

 

04.01.2011 - letter from credit security threat of legal action And door step collection

 

10.01.2011 - letter received from credit security on pink paper offering gesture of reduced sum in settlement, reduced by £200 if payment made in 10 days

 

31.03.2011. - letter received from wescot demanding full payment

 

11.04.2011 - letter from wescot final notice stating they have confirmed our address demanding full payment in ten days or legal proceedings

 

26.04.2011 - letter from nelson and co offering a reduced settlement if we contact within ten days, note the letter dated 26.04.2011, actually received 06.05.2011, the deadline date to contact wescot!

 

20.05.2011 - letter dated from nelson and co, demand payment to wescot

 

May 2011 approx - statement from Santander detailing balance on 01.12.1010 as £1980 approx, 06.01.2011 a £10 credit co-existence collections in default, 30.05.2011 balance £1970 approx

 

31.05.2011 - statement received from Santander opening balance on 31.05.2011 £1970 approx, also saying 30.11.2011, net balance of the same?

 

16.06.2011 - letter from credit security demanding full payment

 

27.06.2011 - letter from credit security demanding immediate payment

 

06.07.2011 - letter from credit security threatening doorstep action and offering a 200 reduction if paid within 10 days

 

01.12.2011 - statement rcd from Santander approx bal £1970, also received during 2012 and 2013

 

30.10.2014 - letter received from Santander advising acct sold to hoist and enc a NOA,

 

I am not sure what that looks like, but a letter enclosed from hoist.

Correspondence address is Salford.

 

 

Also it states that Santander has assigned all of its rights and title to hoist.

Any payments made after oct 2014 will be forwarded to Robinson way, who have been appointed to manage the acct,

if we are on a repayment plan it will remain in place until 29.03.2014 when our circumstances may be reviewed.

Under terms of the assignment and as defind in the DOA 1998

 

hoist is now the data controller of our personal data contained in the records of this account

and they will not change the purpose for which or the way that personal details are used.

 

 

We are then urged to contact Robinson immediately to make payment

 

That's it!!!

 

According to SAR data

 

 

the account was written off on 30.11.2009, with the default being registered some two weeks prior to that.

 

 

However, according to the docs send from santander

 

 

they say in a letter to us dated 28.10.2009 that they issued a default notice. but this was never received,

nor is it referred to in the SAR that we received.....

 

The cca does not have a date on it, and the account was opened in June 2008.

 

For clarity, no payments have ever been made on this account since it was opened..... what bearing this has I dont know.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so during the period of the phantom payment

 

 

it was still with satans bank.

 

 

are/were you paying satans for any other accounts at that time?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

our mortage is with them,

 

 

we also had a bank account with them that had a defaulted o/d.

 

 

long story,

they proper messed up the switching process which left us knee deep,

 

 

that was defaulted and santander closed the acc on 30.05.2009,

 

 

the od was cleared on / around 09.2009 and my credit file was marked as satisfied on 11.01.2010

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a read, well done to you.

 

 

You are clearly a very bright person to have learned so much over the time and stand your position.

 

Can someone remind me what an in enforceable credit agreement is?

 

Also,

just looking through the old papers on thus account,

 

 

I notice that there was a credt of £10 added to the account in January 2011.

 

 

It is for 'CO-EXISTENCE COLLECTIONS IN DEFAULT',

 

 

any ideas as to what that is?

 

 

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=3388730

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

there is no other accoount to set it off against? The only payment that went to Santander at that time was the £10 SAR fee. In light of the fact that the old bank account that we had with them was closed in 2009, and the only other account is our mortgage? Can they offset against that?

 

So any steer on resolving would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Calling in as asked.

 

to challenge that £10 payment I suggest you do what I posted earlier regarding a complaint. Also state that unless they can prove where that payment came from that you are considering it an unsolicited gift. Unless they can prove you deliibratly paid them it would prevent them resetting the clock.

 

Also

 

6 years from 2009 is 2015 so no SB defense yet. UNLESS you live in scotland

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not an expert here.

But as a mortgage is a debt, they cant add £10 of debt to a mortgage and credit it to another account without your authorisation. In my eyes this is unsolicited lending :p

 

Unless there is a credit entry on your mortgage coreesponding to the debit on your account then this is unlikely.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post a draft here first so the more experienced people can check it over :)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Robinson Way do not own the debt do they. So feel free to ignore them

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the phantom payment occurred when the debt was still with the OC.

 

 

if you want to challenge what it is

satans bank are your target.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

30.10.2014 - letter received from Santander advising acct sold to hoist and enc a NOA,

 

 

we already knew that

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

A quick question. I have just checked OH credit file and this is now marked as satisfied with a note saying debt been sold.

 

Does that mean that at some point this debt will appear again.

 

Apologies to ask this question, but I am a little confused as to who can add what to a credit file...

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it will re-appear

 

 

in the top line summary default date is NEVER CHANGED by the DCA

 

 

they can update it add markers in the monthly listing

but the date must not change

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes the new owners of the debt will prob make their own entry. When they do make sure the default date remains the same

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as long as no payment is made or recognistion of the debt made the SB date does not change.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

'they' cant change the SB date

only you can by paying or using or writing acking the debt by a signed letter

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...