Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Overpayment on Jobseekers ... citizens advice any good?


sotty13
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5081 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

CAB are their to help and are usually on the ball with this sort of thing. will know all the rules and regs that apply and will tell you best course of action. dont sign anything from DWP untill youve read it and checked it with CAB, DWP will try and get you to sign statement admiting you know you did wrong and then chase you for cost, interest and recovery of £4000. they may also try for a fraud charge so stick to it been an honest mistake and point out that they should have made this clear to you from outset.

I was told life was supposed to be one long learning curve.

Mines more a series of hairpin bends.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they may also try for a fraud charge so stick to it been an honest mistake and point out that they should have made this clear to you from outset.

 

It is made clear at the phone call stage that an income based claim does need to know about savings.

 

There's an entire section of the phone call that asks in turn if the customer has a current bank account, savings account, ISA, money saved for something, money from a redundancy payment and so on. If the answer to any of these is yes then it prompts the advisor to ask how much is in that type.

 

The entire section is prefaced by a long statement "we now need to know about Savings, this includes any money, savings, investments and property in the UK or abroad that belongs to you, and this is because the benefit you wish to claim may be affected by these".

Link to post
Share on other sites

U seem ti know your stuff. You work for dwp ???

 

I do, I'm one of the people who takes the 45 minute call to make a new claim, so I must read out that sentence anywhere up to 15 times a day. I don't know what happened on your call but the list that follows is pretty extensive and includes the catch all category of "any other savings" so you should have had the opportunity to declare the £15,000 at that stage.

 

As I said I don't know how that part of your call went or whether you'll be prosecuted as I have no experience of that side of the benefits system. I just wanted to make it clear to anyone reading the thread that the opportunity to discuss precise amounts of savings does exist right from the start of the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incapacity benefit is contributory based thus is not affected by capital, and tax credit aside from not being administered by DWP requires interest on capital in excess of £300 to be declared - different benefits have different conditions attached to them dependent on the law.

 

However, income based JSA and contributory based JSA also have differences, which brings me to some questions in light of what CAB have told you and in view of the fact that you were not getting HB or any other benefit except tax credit. You may not have been overpaid at all, or it may be that you have been overpaid but it may not be recoverable. This is what you need to establish - I can help you establish this with a few questions.

 

Which type of JSA were you receiving? Contributory based or income based? Did you declare your capital when asked about it?

 

Privatehudson, is our OP entitled to a printout of the form and what was entered at the outset, or would they have it already?

 

HB

 

It used to be the case that the information taken in a telephone claim was sent to the claimant to sign. In any case, he'd be entitled to a copy under section 7 of the data protection act, if he required a copy.

 

If there is an overpayment of £2000 or more caused by failure to disclose, the case will be referred to departmental solicitors for prosecution (even when the money is re-paid). The FIS can look at your bank records without your knowledge or consent.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm.

 

Unfortunately a lot of the advice I could give is in hindsight to be honest which is of limited value and may just add to your worries. Perhaps the CAB may be able to argue that you misunderstood the questions but that may rely on whether the advisor who took your claim over the phone asked them in full or not. Calls are recorded so the DWP would be able to check that if necessary for you.

 

Ultimately I don't really know much about the Fraud Investigation side of things so perhaps Erika can provide more advice on that.

 

if say i had no savings and had the flat when i 1st claimed ( i never ) its only an income surely if you make money on it???? what would you live on....?
When people own a property and are renting it out we take details of both incoming rent and the outgoings on the property. As it is considered capital we usually also take information about when it was bought, how much it is worth, how long the lease is for, how much the mortgage is and so on. I presume they use this information to calculate whether you have an income or not.

 

With regards to your last remark that is the government's point, if you can live off what you have they will expect you to do so. They'll still provide financial support for a limited period (usually 6 months) if you have paid into the system through Class 1 National Insurance Contributions and meet the other criteria such as actively seeking work. Even that can be blocked or reduced by some types of regular income such as a pension though.

 

The system is designed to check not just if you are eligible for benefit but also whether you need it. We can argue whether this is fair or not but those are the rules.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...