Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Let me start by saying I feel tremendous regret, shame and remorse. I have some debt and personal life has fallen apart over the last year which has caused me to be careless. Doesn’t make it okay I know. In a positive way, i will never take anything in life for granted ever again. I want to volunteer and go back to being a good person. I need some advice/reassurance on the below so I can move on better from this experience. A few days ago I was caught at sainsburys, I paid for part of the food (about £5) and didn’t pay for the other (about £8-10) at self checkout. when I got to the exit someone in plain clothes asked to see my receipt and bag and that they worked for mitie. I told him the receipt was in the store bin (true) and he said he followed me round and knows I didn’t pay for all of it. he very sternly but calmly said he just needs my name then I can leave with the shopping. I said i am in a bad day and can’t do this and was on the verge of breaking down. So I handed him the shopping and slowly walked out. No name given (I read elsewhere this is good and makes it unlikely to develop) and I have no way knowing if police contacted. I overthink a lot and I wonder if they can track me via debit card or nectar card on the transaction. I also wonder if they saw me do it last month and have been waiting for me. I know someone who works at their head office and terrified somehow it will get back. I’m also terrified of being recognised in the street.    I don’t know what’s going to happen. I see a lot in the news today about shoplifting 
    • Hi, I’ve just spotted an Arrangement to Pay marker (TransUnion) on my Barclays Mortgage account for 1 month in March 2022. I’ve spoken to Barclays Customer Service and Complaints about this and they’ve given me some background but have closed my complaint: Direct Debit for mortgage bounced in February and I didn’t notice this at the time. Realised there were arrears in March and called customer service straight away. Offered to pay half the arrears on the call with the other half of the arrears the following month. I prob suggested or accepted this as had done that many years previously when I was a poor student with no adverse consequences. Paid in accordance with this. Barclays call notes report they informed me credit reference agencies would be notified and I indicated I understood. However, complaints team couldn’t access the call because it was too old. They advised I could request a transcript through GDPR and complain via ombudsman if still unhappy - I’ll process the GDPR request this week. Whilst it may be factual that I entered into some kind of arrangement regarding the arrears, it wasn’t clear to me that they would be treating it and reporting it as a formal payment plan along with the potential consequences of this. At no point did I agree to or request to “reducing my contractual payments” - I paid my contractual amount for March and April with 50% more on top. I guess it’s likely they did say something vague about credit reference agencies and it’s also possible that I may have agreed without fully understanding it would be different to a late payment marker. I’m not 100% sure of the impact of the AP but I believe it did tighten up balance transfer and new card offers (Lloyds group in particular) even though the rest of my report is spotless and I have many years managing multiple high balance cards. Although it may have been less comfortable, I also believe I had the means to pay the balance in full if I’d realised the impact at the time. Finally, it feels like Ive been penalised for speaking to customer services directly rather than just upping my payments to cover the arrears. Historically, I was under the impression that Barclays mortgages weren’t even reporting arrears of less than 2-3 months as late payments - although this may have changed since the last time I was in arrears. I’ve had a browse through threads about AP markers and it seems like removal is unlikely if it’s deemed factual but it may be worthwhile escalating to FOS or ICO? Will update with transcript details once I’ve raised and received a response to my request. I suppose the upside of this is that I’ll be even more cautious about negative markers in the future. Thanks, J
    • Rwandans claim asylum in Oz. Rwandans arrive in Australia after perilous journey to claim asylum | Immigration and asylum | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Hunters reportedly find five Rwandan men in mangroves on Saibai Island, a known crocodile habitat  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

natwest summons for joined overdraft and loan


tedney
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2083 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Personally I would leave it stayed Ted...longer its left harder it is to resurrect.

 

Regards

 

Andy

Hello Andy, thanks for that, I think I will leave it as is then:wink:

 

Regards

 

tedney

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • Replies 296
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Tedney, I see you have posted that there has been some action on this. Did you receive a response to any CPR requests that you might have sent out ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tedney, I see you have posted that there has been some action on this. Did you receive a response to any CPR requests that you might have sent out ?

Hello citizenB. I have not sent anything on this case since 2008! Like R B on his thread, now received threatogram/letter from solicitor inviting me to withdraw counterclaim The letter to me is citing Judge Andrew Smith descision of 24 April 2008 and OFT v Abbey National plc and others test case judgement of 25th November 2009. I will scan letter and post, if you think that would help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

These are overdraft charges then, yes ?

 

The OFT did indeed lose the Bank charges reclaim, so I am not quite sure how the counterclaim would stand up. I will ask andyorch to look in on you.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

same advice as the RB thread..the claim is stayed as is the counter claim ...like two grenades ...which party will make the application to lift the stay and lift the clip...bang!!!!!

 

 

 

He could respond and state you withdraw yours and I will mine:razz:

 

I think the final sentence is "tongue in cheek" :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the final sentence is "tongue in cheek" :)

 

Maybe TIC, but I think it may have some mileage in my case?

 

 

Original claim was not well particularised,

it was for a loan account and a separate overdraft on a current account, all lumped together in one sum.

 

 

It included PPI charges which, since the claim was issued have been refunded, along with interest.

 

 

Bank ignored my correspondence, then denied receiving any (all sent by recorded:wink:)

I was paying off monthly amounts both before and since the claim, without missing any payments.

 

 

Have letter from NW subsequent to claim, saying that all payments on the accounts should continue to be made!

 

 

Have not received any statements from NW for the current account since February 2009.

 

 

According to CRA reports, NW were (despite my monthly payments) adding around £70.00 odd monthly to this account

until the PPI on the other account was refunded.

 

My OH also had a claim issued against at the same time for the overdraught on the current account.

No LBA was sent before claim issued. This claim being heard together with mine.

 

I had a total of 5 NW accounts (cards and loan and bank) all of which were in arrears and NW only issued claims on 2?

 

I think I may have a case under BCOBS, but this has not been particularised on court documents up to now.

 

Is it possible to mention BCOBS now. Mention of NW Code of Practice has been made in defence/counterclaim.

 

I would welcome your further thoughts andyorch:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me give it some consideration Tedney...do you have an understanding of BCOBs ?

 

If they have only litigated on 2 of the 5 accounts and those 2 being stayed..you have time to consider the best way forward.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are the last two paras of the letter (verbatim) from Ascent:

 

 

"Accordingly, the bank believes the Court will conclude that your Defence and Counterclaim has no reasonable prospect of success.

We therefore invite you to write to the Court advising that you withdraw your Defence and Counterclaim.

 

If you do not agree to strike out your Defence and that Judgment be granted in the Bank's favour.

We reserve the right to request that you meet the Bank's costs of any application on the basis that

your refusal to withdraw your Defence and Counterclaim is unreasonable."

 

No mention of how PPI amount was included in claim, but now paid back.

If claim proceeds how would this be dealt with?

 

Let me give it some consideration Tedney...do you have an understanding of BCOBs ?

 

If they have only litigated on 2 of the 5 accounts and those 2 being stayed..you have time to consider the best way forward.

 

Regards

 

Andy

Just seen your post andyorch:-), after I posted #21.

 

 

OK, My understanding of BCOBS may be limited.

 

 

I was thinking of "treating clients fairly" which NW certainly, in my opnion, have not, by, amongst other things;

ignoring correspondence,

adding sums without providing statements,

pursuing claim which includes PPI repayment,

not pursuing other debt (which was substantially more that the claim which was brought:???: etc.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they haven't provided any statements for nearly 3 years . Have they been sending the "Notice of Sums in arrears" which they are obliged to send since 2008 !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they haven't provided any statements for nearly 3 years . Have they been sending the "Notice of Sums in arrears" which they are obliged to send since 2008 !

Correct, nothing received on the current account overdraught. Statements for loan account received though, only know current account balances through looking at CRA files

Edited by tedney
typos
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just seen your post andyorch:-), after I posted #21. OK, My understanding of BCOBS may be limited. I was thinking of "treating clients fairly" which NW certainly, in my opnion, have not, by, amongst other things; ignoring correspondence, adding sums without providing statements, pursuing claim which includes PPI repayment, not pursuing other debt (which was substantially more that the claim which was brought:???: etc.?

 

 

Yes that's accepted and understood but they are silent at the moment...the problem we have Tedney is if you try to force your CC through using the above reasons then they may just fight back and also litigate on the other 3 accounts.

If the spot is not itchy ...don't scratch it ( I assume all accounts are all isolated now and you have alternative banking facilities?)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that's accepted and understood but they are silent at the moment...the problem we have Tedney is if you try to force your CC through using the above reasons then they may just fight back and also litigate on the other 3 accounts.

If the spot is not itchy ...don't scratch it ( I assume all accounts are all isolated now and you have alternative banking facilities?)

Yes no credit cards and separate bank account. As you have said, and on rereading Ascent letter, no action taken at present, last directions from the court were "Any application to restore these proceedings either before or after the result of the test case is known, must be made on 14 days notice to the other party."

Should add that all NW accounts have monthly payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tedney,

I'm watching your posts as I'm sure you are mine.

You posted me two paragraphs from your Ascent Letter.......

Here's a copy of mine:

"Accordingly, the Bank believes the County Court will conclude that your Defence has no

reasonable prospect of success. We therefore invite you to write to the Court advising that

you withdraw your Defence.

 

If you do not agree to withdraw the Defence, as instructed we will make an application to

strike out your Defence and that Judgement be granted in the Bank's favour. We reserve the

right to request that you meet the Bank's costs of any application on the basis that your

refusal to withdraw your Defence is unreasonable."

 

Any similarities !!!!!!!

 

Talk soon.

 

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Anyone know what "PR NARR CORR" means please:?:

 

This was entered on a bank personal loan statement,

 

under "Details" of an "Interbranch Payment".

 

Previous entries were described as "Unscheduled Credit":???:

 

Thanks t

Link to post
Share on other sites

if this is from an SAR

 

they should be including a glossary of all terms.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, but this was not from a SAR.

 

Was on annual statement of a defaulted loan account, all but three entries were "InterBranch Payment - Unscheduled Credit"

one entry was "Funds Transfer - Uncheduled Credit"

and two entries were "InterBranch Payment - PR NARR CORR"

 

All payments were made in an identical way to the bank.

Curious as to what PR etc. means and why entries changed.

Thanks t

Link to post
Share on other sites

who's the bank

 

anyone with an sar should be able to look it up for you

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Previous narrative correction?

 

A sum added to correct a spuious erroneous entry on a statement.

 

Pure guess may be nonsense :)

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Previous narrative correction?

 

THanks, Interesting possibility, but entries on the statement were against payment amounts which were made and correctly entered on the statement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hello

I received a court claim some while back (2008).

 

 

The claim was for a single amount not particularised, and, as far as I know,

was made up of an overdraft on a current account and a loan from the same bank.

The bank issued the claim.

 

The case was and still is stayed.

 

In the meantime, I have been repaid PPI from the bank,

which I am assuming was included as part of their claim,

and have been paying small regular seperate monthly payments to the bank against the loan and current accounts.

 

I have posted on here about this before, and am seeking help, advice and/or clarification on the legal aspects.

 

Since January 2009, I have not received any notice of any "Sums in Arrears" in respect of either the loan account

or the overdraft on the current account.

 

 

I have received annual statements for only the loan account, but not a "Sums in Arrears".

 

Am I correct in thinking that the combined balance, as stated on the claim, would be covered by the CCA 1974

however it would need its own agreement signed by me and the bank,

and as the claim combines two separate accounts,

then the bank would need to provide a signed agreement for all three elements,

each of the two original debts (overdraft and loan) and a third for the combined amount?

 

As I have paid off some of the amount of the claim, with payments direct to the bank,

and the bank has, in effect, reduced the amount owing on the loan, by their reimbursement of PPI charges,

 

 

the original claim amount is now not was is outstanding.

 

Would the original claim still stand up in court,

or would the bank have to apply to alter the claim?

 

Thanks

t

 

I have posted this elswhere on here, but in a section without too many views.

So I am repeating it here, hopeful of some feedback, thanks:

 

I received a court claim some while back (2008).

 

The claim was for a single amount not particularised, and, as far as I know, was made up of an overdraft on a current account

and a loan from the same bank.

The bank issued the claim.

 

The case was and still is stayed.

 

In the meantime, I have been repaid PPI from the bank, which I am assuming was included as part of their claim,

and have been paying small regular seperate monthly payments to the bank against the loan and current accounts.

 

I have posted on here about this before, and am seeking help, advice and/or clarification on the legal aspects.

 

Since January 2009, I have not received any notice of any "Sums in Arrears" in respect of either the loan account or the overdraft on the current account.

I have received annual statements for only the loan account, but not a "Sums in Arrears".

 

Am I correct in thinking that the combined balance, as stated on the claim, would be covered by the CCA 1974

however it would need its own agreement signed by me and the bank, and as the claim combines two separate accounts,

then the bank would need to provide a signed agreement for all three elements,

each of the two original debts (overdraft and loan) and a third for the combined amount?

 

As I have paid off some of the amount of the claim, with payments direct to the bank, and the bank has, in effect,

reduced the amount owing on the loan, by their reimbursement of PPI charges, the original claim amount is now not the outstanding balance.

 

Would the original claim still stand up in court, or would the bank have to apply to alter the claim?

Thanks

t

Link to post
Share on other sites

They'd have to alter the claim, and after all this time would be hard pressed to pursue the claim, particularly as you've been making payments.

  • Confused 1
The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...