Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you everyone!  thought to share some points from my experience in court today that may help others who are taking Evri to court: The judge sets out how the hearing will go and how each party should behave; while i was certainly feeling anxious/nervous ahead of the hearing (and I'm sure @jk2054 may have also observed this), the judge really does try to put any non-legal persons at ease; refrain from talking to the other party and instead speak to the judge if you have any questions/responses; the judge and the advocate spoke about tort of negligence - i wasn't sure how this applied to my case but the judge was questionning the advocate about this so i chose to stay out of this; the judge made reference to a historical case of Donaghue v Stevenson which established a duty of care; the judge observed that some of the points in Evri's witness statement by george wood needed cross examination but george was not present today for questionning; While i was claiming 8% interest, the judge pointed out that is the upper limit and that today, savings accounts give 4-5%. I therefore opted for 5% interest which was agreed to by the judge and the advocate; above all else, ensure you know your court bundle and have any notes to help you refer to specific sections - it helped me to structure my answers to the judge/defendant's queries, and point to specific evidence where i was asked to prove e.g., the value of the item. @honeybee13 - yes, will confirm when payment is received. I have emailed the Evri.claims email with my bank details and also provided them after the hearing to the advocate. @BankFodder message received and i am replying to it
    • Looks promising then.  Well done   Dx
    • So a little update.  I sent a complaint to ico and have heard nothing. I just got the general reply email and that's it.  Sat twiddling my thumbs and thought about what I should do next. I searched for the CEO of Studio but then found that he'd left so as keep getting letters from studio about the arrears etc. I thought I'd email the David Twigg. Sent him all the bumpft and a copy of my original complaint and sars request.  Got no response. So didn't know what else to do. Then I thought I'd try through the financial difficulties option on the online form. One last try before I just give up and let them default me.  Then on the 5th June. I got an email from their customer services. That the items that had gone AWOL have all been cancelled. Nothing else on that email, so I had a look in an email account that I don't use anymore and there was an email from the customer service.  That they were sorry for the problems I've had for the last 9 months. That the sars info was emailed to me on 14/04, it wasn't I've kept all spam and deleted emails on that account, they have raised a complaint with their studio pay team regarding the issues, balance dispute, fee's and my credit file. They are hoping to resolve in 3 days but they have upto 56. They also said in regards to my other issues I have to raise a complaint with studio retail but haven't told me how I do that.  The sars info only goes upto the end of December 2023. It has my previous complaints on there but nothing after so I don't know how I get hold of that information. Luckily I've kept copies of every time I've contacted them. Every web chat or social media contact.  Apologies for the extremely long post but I wanted to add everything I could just incase.  I have checked my account balance and it's still minus 900 odd pounds but I'll keep checking to see if it's all cleared and on my credit file.  I'm hoping this is the end of the whole debacle and they close my account because I never want to do this again. Although it's been a learning experience.  Thanks to dx100uk for pointing me in the right direction. Much appreciated.   
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • If you want to cause DCBL trouble, then complain to the SRA.  It would be even more fun if mystic_bertie would complain at the same time, to show the SRA there is a pattern.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice on signing delivery note


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5084 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi:) I have a fish tank comming next week and apparantly have to unpack it as best can and check for damage at the doorstep. I have one of these cold water and find then very relaxing and decided to bide time and get a tropical one on condition got a good deal.

 

Well I did thing is I have one of these and know they are well packed with poylysterene at corners etc. I have been told to check for damage and contents all there and that the driver will be prepared to wait whilst I do it.

 

Thing is I said unless totally out of packaging which you dont do untill in desired location as in upstairs, you cant see small cracks in a huge box sat in the hall way. Rang them for reassurance and they say they are looking for obvious signs of delivery damage as in dropped or hit by forklift etc, so would understand any smaller cracks might not be seen till put on stand.

 

You all know I am the queen of worry so forgive me, but would you advise on the form to cover myself checked to best of ability as in packaging and further check when unrapped properly. Does that seem over the top, they firm seem okay I just dont want to get it upstairs find a crack and then have them say it must have been done after delivery.

 

This firm sell thousands of them and I am sure as there delivery people only deliver these then should be okay, but due to checking at doorstep and its a dark hallway I have to cover myself.

 

What would you do? Its also once you loosen the packaging it makes it more difficult to safely carry to desired location, so impossible to get totally out of the huge box.

 

I think I made myself a fool as was going to cancel due to my concerns and how much I will worry, but they reassured me just to check no huge cracks. Thing is on website it clearly says check on delivery, so have to be careful I will still get help if fault is found xxx

 

And I said I was going to behave worry wise today:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a great deal, better one than before, pre drilled holes in tank for hoses and given free gravel, backing and even a fish net, saved over 100.00 on the cost of the prevous one. However this was delivered to my room.

 

Oh and to laugh I should maybe start to worry about the weight on the ceiling again, ha ha ha;) Made sure have home insurance in case any tank goes pop and floods the garage, been reassured this is unlikely to happen and have pump on standby in case need to get water out quickly. Should have been a scout or guide, 'be prepared' Make it sound as if a fireengine is sat outside dont I?

:) Well son would I would probably sit there panicking, shouting quickly do something knowing me xxxx

 

What I do for my fishy friends xxxx

Edited by loopinlouie
Link to post
Share on other sites

When I've been concerned about issues like this, I have signed the delivery note and written 'not checked' next to my signature. I don't know if this accomplishes anything, but at the very least no one can claim you checked it then signed for it.

The adverts that this forum puts around my username and message are not endorsed by me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

delivery note declarations have little effect, unless damage was or should have been obvious.

 

SOGA states you have a reasonable time to examine the goods. Of course, what is a reasonable time does depend on the nature of the product and any damage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section 34 of the Sale of Goods Act applies to any contract of Sale, i.e.

 

Unless otherwise agreed, when the seller tenders delivery of goods to the buyer, he is bound on request to afford the buyer a reasonable opportunity of examining the goods for the purpose of ascertaining whether they are in conformity with the contract.....
"otherwise agreed" and "on request" could be tricky, while the implication is that this relates to the immediate rejection of goods.

 

However, with a consumer contract there is also this from Article 5 of the EU Directive 1999/44

 

3. Unless proved otherwise, any lack of conformity which becomes apparent within six months of delivery of the goods shall be presumed to have existed at the time of delivery unless this presumption is incompatible with the nature of the goods or the nature of the lack of conformity.
Section 48A of the SOGA implements that.

 

The Directive clarifies the burden of proof.

 

:cool:

 

Was it perhaps a distance contract?

 

:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, i work for city link sometimes, and there is no way that a driver would allow you to open packaging without signing for parcel first.

Also drivers are under timescales and would not wait whilst you opened and checked for damage, and if you have checked and found damage, once signed for the driver would not take parcel back.

What i find is that most customers write unchecked on the sheet, and if the package is damaged, you can either refuse or write packaging damaged and unchecked.

Hope this helps.LFB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the comments xx

 

Thats what concerned me the firm says you will be given time to check the contents all there etc and for damage whilst the courier waits and Ive yet to come accross a courier with the time to do that.

 

The courier apparantly wont help to carry it over the threshold into the hallway, so I think it would be unreasonable to unbox etc and check goods on the driveway especially as glass. Once packaging undone the packaging is weekend for carrying it anywhere else, these things weigh a tonne;) Will open top just in case for a quick shufty

 

So will calm down and unless it arrives in peices:D Check it more thoroughly once in placement knowing soga protects me, thanks again xx

Edited by loopinlouie
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am worrying too much and after what happned recently with the scare, I have decided to cancel it and asked them under the distance selling regulations to refund me.

 

The thing is the other tank I have was delivered to the room by two men and boy did they suffer for the weight of it. Now I could get help to lift if from hallway to upstairs at later date, but the idea of one man only delivery has made me think, they must expect us to collect it from the van and carry it in also. I know they say to kerbside but the woman said doorstep and unless he is superman I dont think it will arrive in one peice.

 

Dont know whats wrong with me lately, too many rash descisions. Just think cant cope with it at the moment, so best to cancel.

 

Anyhow back on track on distance selling they have to refund me whithin reasonable time I would think, I did say I wished to cancel on friday and the woman did her best to reassure me not to and all would be okay, lovely woman but one man to lift a huge tank.;)

 

Emailed them of request to cancel their site says they have to authorise requests, so hope no trouble in doing so, sorry shop xx I am okay asking for refund prior to delivery I would think.

Edited by loopinlouie
Link to post
Share on other sites

Emailed them of request to cancel their site says they have to authorise requests, so hope no trouble in doing so, sorry shop xx I am okay asking for refund prior to delivery I would think.

 

:eek:

 

Really?

 

The consumer does not request a cancellation. "The consumer gives a notice of cancellation to the supplier" that the contract is cancelled, as per section 10 of the Regulations.

 

The Statute authorises the cancellation of a distance contract, not the supplier.

 

The word they need is "acknowledge".

 

:!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, company kindly called me back though havnt confirmed by email as requested, but I dont think that matters. They tried to reassure me one man could carefully deliver it to the door, via tail lift and another devise which carries it to the door, trolley I think. I said I still had concerns due to glass that it could get damaged unless carried off lorry by two men to door. They said they would ring my local deppo to confirm, but I kindly asked for a refund adn thanked them for their time and said it was a good deal, but I would be too upset if arrived damamged and would prefer to use firm with two men delivery.

 

This tank is huge remember:eek: and of course glass. I am sure they deliver thousands safely and they were lovely and I suppose for such a saving compared to other firms it has to be made somewhere to be fair on them. I just think I will have to wait till can get local firm to deliver another one when saved for it, so never mind.

 

Should get money back in a few days apparantly xx

 

I think when next time asked for my profession, I should say executive worrier, because thats all I seem to to, think need to go back on anxiety pills:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats what I thought kracken, so incase of anyproblems and having to argue it wasnt my fault, I thought best to cancel. Its a little contradictory to say we are looking for obvious transport damage and smaller cracks we will understand cant be found till fill with water, but that the liability is mine according to them. I would have worried there was a potential battle if any problems, so not worth the potential hastle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Refund already received back in account, couldnt be more prompt if they tried:D Shame about the tank but have found it elsewhere ten pounds cheaper till friday and two men delivery, so alls well that ends well:D

 

If ever replace my birdies cage though, would use them xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...