Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Deep doodah with Natwest loan and O/D


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5101 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

Just got a letter from NatWest saying our offer to pay token amount towards loan £4328.50 and O/D £5179 is unacceptable and issuing formal default notices before being passed to recoveries department.

 

We have tried to keep this bank going but just can't do it any longer.

 

The loan is in my OH's name and the O/D account is a joint account but they seem to have it all in my OH's name.

 

Has anyone any experience with NatWest issuing bankruptcy orders, or are they likely to look for an arrangement? They always seem to be very hard nosed. "We can't make an arrangement because you couldn't pay it" was one comment.

 

The loan was taken out 31/1/07.

 

We also have a business account with NatWest which is now dormant with no owings, and set up parachute accounts elsewhere.

 

Fighting the panic and grateful for your comments.

 

Rocky

Rocky

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they can refuse your 'unacceptable' payments all they like, if that is really all you can afford to pay back each week/month then that is all you need pay them, a Judge wouldn't make you pay more than you could afford.

 

Keep everything in writing unless you can record your phone calls, as you will have no evidence of their lousy customers service skills.

 

Do you own any property or have any assets?

If so it might be likely that they will go for a charging order on your property rather than BR?

 

Personally I would just set up a standing order to pay them the amount you said you would and they refused to accept, thereby in the eyes of a Judge it will be seen more favourably than not making any attempt to pay them at all.

 

Others will be able to give you more advice and support, will keep an eye out,:wink:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Smae, Rocky:)

 

I don't have experience of NatWest but I'm sure someone who has will be along soon.

 

In the meantime, deep breaths - don't let 'em get to you - the hardest thing in the world is not to panic - but their objective is to make you feel bad - and that's the first thing you have control over (I say, having to work at it all the time myself!!!:-D). Don't let those lovely:rolleyes: people from the bank grind you down.

 

Take care & hwyl fawr

H.x

That the birds of worry and care fly above your head, this you cannot change. But that they build nests in your hair, this you can prevent. --- Chinese proverb

Link to post
Share on other sites

No property or assets to speak of. Lots of debts and not much income.

 

With them treating the two accounts together, I guess I will have to wait for the default notices and then the recovery people to tell me how to make payments?

 

They also paid themselves a lot last year for bouncing the loan even though I had made an agreement for a temporary extension to the O/D and I will be seeking to get the amount reduced. (need to try and remember the detail).

 

Rocky

Rocky

Link to post
Share on other sites

With them treating the two accounts together, I guess I will have to wait for the default notices and then the recovery people to tell me how to make payments?

 

Can you just clarify this?

Have they added your OD debt with that of the loan?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi........1st move CCA Natwest for a copy of the original signed agreement for the Loan account,you might get lucky and they cant produce the same.As Baz.B states clarify that they have not put the 2 accounts under 1 heading.It is my experience that they do this but actually keep the accounts still separate,you cant CCA for a bank account.Do you have statements for both accounts,if not you also need to SAR Natwest for accounts going back 6 years and claim back charges on the bank account..will look out for your reply............FS......then we can help further......????

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you SAR them then they should provide ALL data they have regarding your account with them, and not just the last six years, this is a tactic they normally use to try and fob you off from recovering unfair charges beyond this period..

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, thanks for your replies.

Nw haven't added the accounts together, just listed them in a letter to OH.

 

The two accounts are listed: Personal loan £4328.50 DR

and Current plus £5170.27 DR.

 

I have the original agreement for the loan which was January 2007.

current plus OD goes back years.

 

Letter says can't accept offer, but we want to assist you so phone this number. (my speak).

 

I am challenging some other debts, AIC/Wescot/CL finance, but I am a bit wary of Nw. OH is not very understanding!

 

Rocky

Rocky

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter says can't accept offer, but we want to assist you so phone this number.

 

So in 'assisting' you they refuse your offer of payment!:-x

 

Ridiculous!!!!

 

Just set up a S/O with the amount you have offered them, and pay it that way until you can recover any charges they may have applied to the account, then 'IF' they were foolish enough to attempt legal action, they would look very stupid in front of a DJ, as you would only be paying them what you can realistically afford.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Latest letter from NatWest says:

 

"funds have become available from the servicing account and a transfer has now been made to the loan for the missing payment (and put the overdraft up by £197 - they must have upped the limit haven't notified me of charges yet).

 

"Please make sure cleared funds are available in the servicing account the day before payments (loan) are due."

 

"Please call at the local branch to discuss your situation and how we may be able to help you further".

 

Is this legal, and how do I stop Natwest Peter robbing Natwest Paul and charging me?

 

They played games last year by paying the loan and charging me for going over the overdraft limit even though they had agreed to raise the limit when I tried to stop the loan.

 

I am getting cross. They seem to be ignoring our letter of hardship and offer of repayment. The loan would be covered by a CCA which may or may not be enforceable but the overdraft could be more easily enforced perhaps?

 

Grateful for advice as I am still a bit lost with this one.

 

Rocky

Rocky

Link to post
Share on other sites

I kind of had the same issue with Nat West.

 

I sent them a letter, along with an I & E statement, to show what I was able to pay, as I was trying to deal with it myself rather than going through CCCS. At first they said no, so I resent the letter and they accepted it.

 

I also changed my bank account, so money went into a a different bank account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortuantely that is the only way to stop them from offsetting money from one account to another, which they are legally allowed to do.

 

You will have to open up another bank account with a seperate banking group to stop them doing this again.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regard to an I & E, they are not entitled to this information, and know that full well. Only a judge is entitled.

 

Your I & E is your own personal information, and deals with YOUR money, and as such it really is YOUR decision as to how much you can afford.

 

Make sure that whatever you pay (never mind them saying not acceptable - tough) remember that this may well be a long term commitment and you will need to make these payments on a regular basis, so don't struggle and make them too high.

 

Have had dealings myself, just ignored them, and nearly SB now.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...