Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please Help Emotional Wreck!!!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5056 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ppi is tick top right of 2nd image in post 9

thanks for popping in postggj

 

gonna be a bit busy as the mrs is down from scotland till thursday

got her last cancer after care app in london tuesday.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx

 

Thats Game Over:)

 

Why Is The Ppi Not On The Agreement With Its Own T&c And Perscribed Terms

 

WILSON V FCT ANYBODY ON THE FEES:D:D

 

Housewife

 

Do You Have A Policy Document Or Any Correspondants On This Ppi

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks post

 

was i right BTW about the witness sig?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx

 

Thats Game Over:)

 

Why Is The Ppi Not On The Agreement With Its Own T&c And Perscribed Terms

 

WILSON V FCT ANYBODY ON THE FEES:D:D

 

Housewife

 

Do You Have A Policy Document Or Any Correspondants On This Ppi

 

Its people/caggers like you that make one believe that life ain't over. postggj your just another example of one of the legends that CAG has the honour of having aboard.

 

housewife, looks like one of your wishes may have come true, you have your personal santa to help

 

Words cannot describe how legalpickle helped me in my hour of need, and just popped in to say good luk, and to youto dx, your also another legend.

 

Blimey I think this sun is getting to me, I'm getting too emotional here:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

First of all - BIG APOLOGIES!!

I only have an internet phone, so it's a bit awkward seeing messages and keeping up to date. I've had to wait until my two babes have settled, before coming round to use parent's office computer.

 

postggj - answers as follows:-

 

1) Amount of credit -£5,100

2) Total amount payable - £7,769.80

3) Agreement over 54mths

4) Acceptance Fee - blank on agreement

5) OPtion Fee - £299.00 payable with final payment.

6) APR - 15.1%

7) Cash price of vehicle (on the invoice from the garage) - £5,864.00*

8) Total cost of down payment and/or deposit - £764.00

9) Monthly Repayment - £124.20

 

The actual agreement does not have the date my husband signed, but the "used vehicle order form" which was given same day is dated 7th October 2007. *This was the same form which gave details of cash price.

 

Clause 2.5

The acceptance fee is due and payable with the first monthly payment as an additional payment unless you have chosen to spread this payment over the term of the agreement. If you chose to spread the payment we will calculate and apply interest on the Acceptance Fee in the same wasy as stated for total interest at the end of the "Other Financial Information" section.

 

Clause 3

Option To Purchase

 

You will have an option to purchase the car by paying us the option fee shown in the "Other Financial INformation" section. Once you have paid all other relevant payments stated in this agreement and if you have kept to your side of this agreement. Until that time the car remains our property. If you do not exercise that option by paying us the option fee with the final payment on it's due date you must :-

 

a) return the car (together with all keys, master keys, V5 registration form, immobiliser and other codes relating to the car and anythin reasonablly necessary to allow us to get full value for the car ) to us or to such dealer, auction house or other person we reasonably specify, at your expense and on the date for payment of the final payment or such other date we specify, unless you arrange with us for us to collect the car from you. If we arrange to collect the car from you, either because we have agreed with you to do so or because you failed to return the car to us, then you must pay us the cost and expenses we incur in doing this when we ask, at the rates charged to us by our suppliers without any allowance for any volume discounts we may get;

 

b) allow us to inspect the car, to see if you have taken reasonable care of the car in accordance with the terms and conditions of this agreement; and

 

c) pay to us anything due under paragraph (a) above, any payments which were due to us at the date of termination which you have not paid, the costs of all repairs required to put the car into a reasonable condition (including the cost of repairing or replacing all keys, master keys, immobiliser, and other codes relating to the car and anything else reasonably necessary to allow us to get full value for the car) and any sums due to us for breach of this agreement by you before the date it comes to an end. Those payments must be made to us when you return or when we collect the car or, if the amount of those payments is not known at that date, when we ask for them.

 

On the subject of PPI. You will think us very stupid:roll: but we hadn't even realised that we had agreed to this. It's only since you asked about agreement and we scanned it, that we noticed it was there. A certificate of insurance and summary of conditions were stapled on the back. To be honest, the paperwork was just accepted and filed away as soon as we got home. A BIG LESSON FOR US I think!!!

 

HW23

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ell Then Its Def Game Over

 

What You Have Is A Multiple Agreement With The Ppi

 

It Needs To Be Within The 4 Corners Of The Agreement With Its Own Perscribed Terms

 

game Over

Totally Unenforceable

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes!

 

:D

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HeftyHippo

HOWZAT then! From being prepared to dump the car somewhere to being the proud owner of an unenforceable debt!

 

One thing I noticed that may/not be relevant but perhaps one of the clever guys could consider - the original account was taken over by Santander, can it be done like that or is a novation required? Does it make any difference which they do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

dear Postggj, sorry to bother you. My husband is recieveing more letters of the debt company demanding the money or they are taking him to court.

I was just wondering if you are still doing us a letter.

 

Sorry for being pushy, just i am keen to get the ball rolling.

 

Thank you so much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

send a pm

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

letter Number One To Code Red

 

housewife

xx

xx

Code Red

Xxx

Xx

Date

 

Agreement/account Number

 

formal Dispute As To Your Complaints Department

 

Dear Sir/madam

 

I Am Putting This Account Into Formal Dispute And Require A Final Response With The Option Of Passing The Dispute Up To The Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

As You Are Aware I Have A Hire Purchese Agreement Regulated By The Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

As To Your Letter Dated The 13/04/2005 Terminating The Agreement And Demanding The Return Of The Vehicle.

 

As You Are Aware, I Have Paid More Than A Third Off This Vehicle In Repayments And As Such Am Protected. If You Contemplate A Reposession With Out A Court Order, It Will Be Classed As Unlawfull Recession Of Contract.

 

If I Wish To Do A Voluntry Termination On The Vehicle, It Will Be My Choice And Not Yours.

 

i Now Move On To The Agreement

 

i Consider This Agreement To Be Unenforceable For The Following Reasons.

 

1/ The Fees Included On This Agreement Have Been Included In The Total Charge For Credit

As You Are Aware Under The Judgement Wilson V First County Trust, These Fees Have To Be Kept Seperate As They Are Infact A Charge For Credit.

 

If You Can Show These Fees Are Not Subject To Interest, Being A Charge For Credit, I Would Be Obliged.

 

2/ With Reference To The Witness Signature, Can You Confirm This Witness Was Not An Employee Of The Car Show Room

 

 

3/ I Will Now Move Onto The Payment Protection Insurance Added Onto The Agreement

 

Now, As Ppi Has Been Added To This Agreement, It Becomes A Multiple Agreement Under Section 18 Of The Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

This Means The Ppi Elemant On The Agreement Needs Its Own Set Of Perscribed Terms With Signature Of Acceptance Of Not Only The Hire Purchase, But The Payment Protection Insurance.

 

still On The Subject Of Payment Protection Insurance

 

Please Send By Return The Following Documents

 

Statement Of Price

 

Statement Of Means

 

Insurance Underwriting Sheets

If You Are Unable Or Unwilling To Suply These Documents With In Fourteen Days A Request Via The Civil Procedure Rules 36.16 (pre Action Protocol) Will Be Submitted Along With The Enclosed Data Subject Access Request For Compliance.

I Must Inform You That Any Further Atempt At Enforcement While This Account Is In Dispute Will Be Reported To The Office Of Fair Trading As I Will Consider It An Offence Under

 

consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations

And Require A Full And Final Response To This Dispute.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LETTER NUMBER 2 TO SANTANDER

 

SEND THIS TO SANTANDER

[your address]

 

 

 

[their address]

 

 

[DATE]

 

 

Data Protection Act 1998

Subject Access Request

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx (or multiple numbers if more than one account)

 

 

Please supply me with copies of all the data which you hold on me in relation to any matter and in any form and for any period of time.

Please note that I require disclosure of any personal data[ which you hold on me for the entire period of my dealings with you.

The Subject Access is not limited to my transaction history and it is not linited merely to 6 years of historical information.

Additionally, where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my financial business with you.

I require all information on details of all insurance products supplied by santandaer. This is to include the statement of means, statement of price, details of all insurance premium tax paid, and underwriting sheets.

 

If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply. Furthermore, if I discover that you have levied disproportionate penalties or charges which are invalid under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations against me, then I shall be reclaiming them together with any interest harges which you have levied on them.

As it is your wrongdoing and mishandling of my account which has created the necessity for this Subject Access Request, I shall also be reclaiming the enclosed £10 Data Protection Act subject access request fee.

 

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

I would be happy to collect the Data from my local branch.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...