Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton  Name of the Claimant ? lowell Solicitors : Overdales solicitors  How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.  13 may 2024 What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 1. the claim is for the sum of £6163.61due by the defendant under an agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 for hsbc uk bank plc. Account (16 digits) 2. The defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a default notice was served under s 87(1)  of the consumer credit act 1974 which as not been compiled with. 3. The debt was legally assigned to the Claimant on 23/08/23, notice on which as been given to the defendant.  4. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £117.53 the Claimant claims the sum of £6281.14. Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?   Not to my knowledge. Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online but it was for a smaller amount they kept on increasing this with me asking Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. It was assigned to a debt collection agency  Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? yes  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes I also made offers to pay original creditor a smaller amount but was not replied to Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No Why did you cease payments? I was made redundant and got a less paid job I also spent some time on furlough during covid and spent some 3 months on ssp off work. What was the date of your last payment? May 2021 Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes at the time I communicated with all my creditor's that I was running out of funds to pay the original agreements once my redundancy money ran out that was when my accounts defaulted. I then wrote to all my creditor's with pro rata offers of payments but debt collectors took over the accounts.
    • Just an update for all. I received about a letter every other week, increasing in threat levels. Then I hadn't had one for a about two weeks, then Saturday received a carbon copy of the very first letter they sent me in February. Made me laugh, rinse and repeat. 
    • So, your response was not received by the SCP as you did not send it with a valid stamp. Therefore, from my two option in post #14, the first option is the only one available to you, but you do not have the option of asking to be sentenced at the fixed penalty level as the reason the SCP did not receive your response was down to you. Here's a reminder of what to do: Respond to the SJPN by pleading “Not Guilty” to both charges. In the “Reasons for pleading Not Guilty” box state that you are willing to plead guilty to the speeding charge providing, and only providing, the “Fail to Provide Driver's Details" (FtP) charge is dropped. This is a tried and tested method to deal with your problem and is almost always successful. Before the pandemic it was necessary to attend court to do this "deal" because it needs the agreement of the police prosecutor.. During the pandemic courts made every effort to have as few  people as possible attend and they began doing this deal under the "Single Justice" procedure without the defendant's attendance. Some courts have carried this procedure on whilst others have reverted to a personal attendance being necessary. If you are required to attend, your case will be taken out of the SJ procedure and you will be given a date for a hearing in the normal Magistrates' Court. If that is the way they do it in the area involved you will have to attend, see the prosecutor and offer your "deal" in person. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest have issued statutory demand - Advice please **Set Aside**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4598 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I'm new to this. I hope some one can advise me on the following. I've recieved a Statutory Demand from capquest dated the 1st of July 2010. It is signed by Barry Davies albeit a photo copied signature. I've read a few of the posts here and they all seem quite helpful. But i'm confused as to what i should do first off and time limits. Any advice would be much appreciated.:???:

you have 18 days in order to set this aside...you will need forms 6.4 and 6.5 can you give us a bit more info as to what the debt is for? so we can give you a lot more advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 361
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi debt4get,

The debt is from a Barclays loan i had in July 2003. Unfortunately i don't have the original details. But seem to remember it was for £5000.00. The SD is for £6123.73. I did contact capquest a while back after being duped by a telegram or something. I did pay installments totalling £850.00. But i'm self employed and work hasn't been in abundance, i rent a property with my wife and have no assets to speak of. I'm not disputing that i owe the dept but there is noway i can pay it in full or even a lump sum off at the moment. Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi not had chance to read the full thread yet but some key pointers to what i always do now when i get a request for payment for a loan or credit card account.

 

1) Obtain a copy of the credit agreement, terms and conditions and statement of account.

 

 

Once received, look to make sure the agreement is enforceable, check to make sure the terms of the agreement allowed the creditor to make charges on the account for “Late Payments, Missed Payments, and Over Limit fees"

 

You will be surprised by how many agreements don’t mention nothing about default charges but still charge them to your account. In order for the creditor to make default charges on a regulated credit agreement, it must be including in the terms and conditions.

 

2) if you have been charged any default fees that are not permitted by the agreement then make a formal dispute with the creditor, If the agreement is unenforceable, also make them aware why its unenforceable and state what you would like to happen in terms of settlement.

 

the above can protect you from Statutory Demands, as its an abuse of process to issue a SD when you have a ligament dispute with the creditor and they are then forced to take action via a county court claim as apposed a SD.

 

Try to get this information i,e the documents before the SD hearing, as this will help, if you can show that you have a dispute etc.

 

How to reduce the risk of bankruptcy following a statutory demand?

 

(a) To avoid bankruptcy reduce the debt to less than £750.

 

 

(b) Offer to pay the debt by instalments.

 

 

© Make a reasonable offer to settle the debt.

 

 

(d) Apply to have the Statutory Demand set aside on the grounds that the debt is in dispute.

 

 

After the period of 21 day from the statutory demand being served the person issuing the statutory demand may begin the process that petitions the person’s bankruptcy.

 

 

To successfully get a statutory demand set aside one or more of the following must be satisfied:-

 

 

* The amount stated on the statutory demand is disputed.

 

 

* The person issuing the statutory demand also owes money. This is called a counterclaim.

 

 

* The person issuing the statutory demand is holding security that equals or exceeds the amount owing.

 

 

* The demand was issued in error.

 

 

* The amount owing is less than £750

 

 

* Execution has been stayed on a judgement debt.

 

 

* The debtor is complying with an instalment order. This would mean the debt is not actually owed as it is being paid back.

 

 

* The creditor failed to comply with the rules and prejudiced the debtor in the process.

 

 

Step 1 - So the best way of dealing with an SD is to accept the SD because it has lots of important information that you are going to need.

 

 

Step 2 - Read it carefully and decide if the particulars are correct. The debt has to be over £750 and not in dispute.

 

 

Step 3 - Write to the person named in part B of the SD informing him/her that the debt is in dispute and say why.

 

 

Step 4 - Print out an Application to Set Aside a Statutory Demand and an Affidavit in Support of Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand which you must fill in and present at the court within 18 days of being served.

 

 

I would have a read of this thread which has some very sensible advice too.

 

 

And that’s the process. If you have any doubts about how to do this then I would strongly recommend consulting a Solicitor.

Edited by UK26
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

One minor query; what was the date of the last payment? If it was over six years ago in England/Wales or five years ago in Scotland then the debt is statute barred and they cannot take any legal action to recover the debt.

 

I will now put forward an alternative course of action to consider and for other CAGers to comment on.

 

DCA's have frequently issued an SD in the hope of provoking a reaction from you. I am myself in possession of a number of SD's, all from one DCA. I had no recoverable assets and chose to ignore the SD.

 

Nothing happened.

 

In each case I got a follow up letter saying they were in a position to start bankruptcy proceedings, but nothing further happened other than I was back in the cycle of DCA beg/threat letters, all of which continue to be filed.

 

It is one thing to threaten bankruptcy as the SD is easy to download, fill in and serve (by the way did arrive by any sort of special delivery or a real person, or was it second class post? If they were serious they would get it properly served so they could prove you had received it). It is another to pay out the fees that are subsequently required to make someone bankrupt.

 

Far better from the creditor's point of view to go for a county court judgment because it is ultimately cheaper to do and if successful does not involve any other creditors.

 

If you have little or no assets they would be foolish in the extreme to make you bankrupt, as they would not get back what they have put in to get you there and any assets that get put on the table by the bankruptcy must be shared out amongst all your other creditors, of whom they likely do not know much about.

 

From my own experience I feel they are unlikely to follow through the threat and you should therefore consider ignoring it.

 

Having said that if you have good grounds for getting the SD set aside you can make some money out of the costs of carrying out the set aside which would be fun.

 

Interested to see what other CAGers say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for reply,

My last payment was in May this year. I really don't want to ignore this and from what i've read it would be unwise to do so. In a nutshell i just can't afford to pay this debt at the moment. I just want to know the best way forward from here.:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your Address

 

Date

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:− Account/Reference Number 4563210025897412

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77 TO S.79 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77(4) will apply.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

print your name

Edited by postggj
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does not matter now, since limitations act wont apply, could hardly claim that the payment in may was in error.

 

Last Payment May This Year

 

Was There Ever A Six Year Gap

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does not matter now, since limitations act wont apply, could hardly claim that the payment in may was in error.

 

 

MAY I ASK WHY THE LIMITATIONS ACT WONT APPLY

 

AS SOON AS SIX YEARS HAS PASSED, THATS IT,

 

EVEN IF A PAYMENT HAS BEEN MADE AFTER THE SIX YEAR PERIOD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrong, say for example 7 years had gone and you had paid noting to the account, then on the 7th year you make a payment on the account for say £10.00

 

The 6 years will start again from the date of last payment, which in this case was May 2010

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will get my book out and read up, and get back to you.

 

I Must Disagree And Checking Regs

 

If A Payment Is Made 5 Years 364 Days Into A Dca Hands, Then Yes, The Statute Of Limitations Would Restart But If Six Years Have Gone By, Its End Game

 

Any Chance Of A Link

 

Ill Be The First To Put My Hands Up If Wrong

 

ITS 12 YEARS FOR A MORTAGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is any period of 6 years where no payment or acknowledgement of the debt in writing has been made then it is Statued barred

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.bdl.org.uk/images/25_liability_for_debts_and_the_limitation_act.pdf

 

 

If the creditor can prove you wrote to

them admitting the debt, or you or anyone else

owing the debt made a payment, then the six

year limitation period would start running from

the date you last made contact or made a

payment.

 

However this document does state

 

If you have started to make payments on a

debt where there was more than a six-year gap

then it is probably unenforceable.

 

 

i still think, that its enforceable if you make payment after 6 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does appear you are correct in what you are saying so apologies to you on this point.

i was on the understanding that if any payment was made then the time would start again, even if 6 years had gone or not.

So sorry to Postggi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks.

I've read all your replies, i'm not altogether sure if there was a gap of 6 years but there is a good possibility. I've prepared my letter for request, thanks Postggj. Do i send that soon as?

Link to post
Share on other sites

might be worth tweeking the letter as you are not sure if there was a gap of 6 years.

 

 

This one is for a Fixed term loan agreement.

 

Dear Sir or Madam:

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY OR ANY COMPANY YOU CLAIM TO REPRESENT

 

Re: Account no: xxxxxxxx

 

this letter is a formal request pursuant to Section 77 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77(4) will apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

 

The template letter at post 208, contains an error

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77(6) will apply.

 

There is no Sub section 6 of Section 77, it should be

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77(4) will apply.

Edited by UK26
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...