Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • statute barring in Scotland is 5yrs from last payment/use date or date of default Notice + 14 days, whichever is the later. dont confuse that with the 6yrs debts show on credit files (DN's 6th bday regardless to payment or not). they'd never get a claim raised by august in 99% of cases . as long all these debts were taken out whilst resident in scotland and you have not moved since taking them out but failed to inform the original creditor before the debt sale....... then stay radio silent until sb date is reached. then if you wish send our scottish sb letter. just remember unlike E&W in scotland debts are extinguished, dead , gone , parrot. once SB'd dx  
    • Hi all, Love this site and it's no nonsense advice, have dipped in and out of the consumer forums over the years, mostly to assure myself that what I was doing was the right thing when dealing with various businesses (almost 100% success rate, thanks in part to reading and more reading here.). Anyway, the time is almost approaching where I might need to ask for some specific help and I have a couple of queries that I can't see definitively answered. Due to financial mismanagement and severe anxiety issues I stopped paying all unsecured debt in December 2018 (one slipped to the first week in Jan 2019 when the last payment was made having rechecked my bank statement from that period - all my unsecured debt direct debits were cancelled in early Jan 2019). This has left half a dozen debts;  a couple of credit cards, a bank loan, Shop Direct and some Hitachi Finance stuff having been sold on and passing the rounds through the usual suspects, Lowells, Link, PRA Group, others related to them, and then back to them again. I have somehow successfully managed to maintain radio silence and avoided anything more worrying than their begging letters.  I have blocked their phone calls and texts, bumped all emails to the spambox and had a chuckle at their desperate letters.  I've never had anybody at the door.  I have been at the same address since before I defaulted and all correspondence comes to my current home address.  I have NEVER contacted them or admitted any debt. In anticipation of them perhaps ramping up action at the last minute I've had a look at my credit report on Credit Karma (rec'd from this very place) and I see that the default dates on these range from May 2019 to November 2019. Also in preperation I've been reading, reading and reading lots here as advised. Obviously being in Scotland there are a lot fewer posts relating to these matters and it's always quite annoying when OP's do not follow up with any outcome on their cases - how rude! This has also left me a bit confused of when I am able to finally breathe easy (although cancelling all the direct debits in Jan 2019 was the biggest sigh of relief as I knew it was all going to be unmanageable and, well, default one, default all.). I've been reading that defaults should be filed 3-6 months after the missed payment but one of my larger debts was defaulted on 27th August 2019 when the last payment I made was 10th December 2018, meaning the first missed payment was 10th Jan 2019.   My query for now is - when should I infer that these debts are prescribed?  From when the payment was missed, or taking the default date plus 5 years from the credit report? The three I have with the May date are moot anyway as either way they are gone  - some letters from Lowell offering me 90% off to settle is what got me thinking these must have been near SB status, however I have one big 10k+ with a July date and another 10k+ at the end of August I am feeling a bit anxious again, even though I know there is nothing to worry about with the begging letters.  Reading the various forums I am not sure why the OC's didn't take action against me when I read time and again the surprise that other posters haven't already been taken to court for lesser amounts - I'm also surprised I've avoided any action this long as there are plenty in this forum and sub forum who are whisked off to the court by the beggers minions after only a year or so after defaulting.  There are no CCJ/decrees listed on my credit report and I have not received any such judgements against me.  I still just regularly receive the begging emails to the spambox, the blocked phone calls and the letters from the they. I'm also reading that there is no need in Scotland to send an LBC so what should I be looking out for to know that the time has come to engage with CCA requests etc? I'm afraid in a fit I threw a lot of the paperwork out but I have a box of stuff I'm going to go through which may have the original letters from the OC's. Thanks in advance for any advice.  
    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Like
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DLA and Magistrates Fine


Saz83
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5137 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Earlier this year I pleaded guilty by post for not having a television license. It went to magistrates court and I was ordered to pay back £110. I am on benefits and couldnt pay the amount back at once so I filled in a form detailing my income and my outgoings per week.

 

I was left with about £3 a week after everything was paid. The benefits I get are Income Support and also DLA. Today I recieved a letter stating I was to pay back £20 per week. I was under the impression that DLA wasnt to be counted in matters like this as it is used for my mobilty and care needs. I currently use my DLA to pay a private carer to help me about my home with cleaning etc and also to help me get to the shops.

 

Am I wrong in thinking that DLA can't be used to pay a magistrates fine?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always thought that benefit was the absolute minimum that one needed to live on, so how can people pay fines out of it?

 

Also, why aren't tax payers complaining to the government. Poor people on the dole should be given all the home comforts and extra spending money they need so they can live a carefree relaxing life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Poor people on the dole should be given all the home comforts and extra spending money they need so they can live a carefree relaxing life.

 

Im not on the dole. I am on income support as I cannot work. I am also on disability living allowance. I do not have any extra spending money and I do not live a carefree and relaxing life.

 

I always thought that benefit was the absolute minimum that one needed to live on, so how can people pay fines out of it?

 

Those on benefits do live on the absolute minimum and yes, we have to pay fines out of it should we need to.

 

This still doesnt answer my question regarding the DLA counting as income.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Poor people on the dole should be given all the home comforts and extra spending money they need so they can live a carefree relaxing life.

 

Im not on the dole. I am on income support as I cannot work. I am also on disability living allowance. I do not have any extra spending money and I do not live a carefree and relaxing life.

 

I always thought that benefit was the absolute minimum that one needed to live on, so how can people pay fines out of it?

 

Those on benefits do live on the absolute minimum and yes, we have to pay fines out of it should we need to.

 

This still doesnt answer my question regarding the DLA counting as income.

Don't the people who pay you have an answer?

What about CAB?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Commiekips

 

Unless I am misreading or misunderstanding your comments, I think you are a little out of order for having a go at someone who has come on here to try and get some help. Irrespective of anything else this forum is here to try and help people, making sarcastic remarks against someone who's circumstances you know little or nothing about does not help anyone!

 

Saz83

 

There are I understand limits to what can be taken out of benefit for fines, council tax and a number of other things as well. Despite the sarcasm from commiekips, the best thing you could do would be to ring the office that deals with your claim. You cannot appeal against a fine being deducted from your Income Support (to the best of my knowledge) but you can appeal against the amount, if it is causing hardship. I am not 100% on the DLA side but I always thought DLA was pretty much disregarded when deciding someones income for the purpose of ability to pay.

 

Someone else may well come along with some more precise answers for you but a call to the office might well be the best course of action for you.

  • Haha 2

:)IF YOU ARE BORED WITH LITTLE TO DO:)

My Story - Simon -V- The (SH)Abbey - :!:WON / 19 November 2007:!:

 

SKY TV and the penalty charge - how far will it go?

 

Me V Its4me and Close Premium Finance:!:WON / 28 November 2007:!:

 

IF I CAN HELP, I WILL, IF I DO, THEN PLEASE CLICK ON THE SCALES ON THE LEFT

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not trying to be funny or nothing but leaving aside your DLA, if I'm not mistaken you also get the I.S. disability premium of £28 per week. The unfortunates on JSA somehow survive on the basic £65.45, I guess they have had to learn to budget more carefully than they would if they got £28 extra.

  • Haha 1

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't the people who pay you have an answer?

 

We just administer the benefits, the goverment pays them, they set the amounts, the applicable amounts, not nearly enough in most cases.

 

 

 

With regards to the fine deductions, its the courts that set the amount to come out each week, they notify third party deductions on how much to take out each week, third party will then take this amount out of the Income Support.

I.S have to take out the instructed amount and pass it on to the court out of the benefit.

 

Seems a lot to be taking out, hope you manage to get it reduced soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pat, have you possibly misread, or read too quickly. I thought that Saz was just c'n'pasteing what another poster said in an earlier post. Making a retort to the poster's inappropriate comments.

 

Best regards,

Paul.

Edited by loan_ranger
bad "speling" LOL

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Commiekips seems to have a chip the size of a boulder on his shoulder, seemingly thinking that every person on any kind of benefit is a scrounger for whom he pays personally by working.

 

He conveniently forgets that by and large these people did work, did pay into the system to help people who weren't working then, and that one day no doubt, he won't be working anymore and at that point, people who work will be paying for his benefits, because that's the way this system works.

 

Either that or he's a troll. Take your pick.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Patrickq1 its not saz with the Snide Comments but commiekips.

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DLA is not always disregarded for income purposes, though it is disregarded as income when working out means tested benefit. For example, it is a prescribed benefit from which overpayments of Social Security benefit can be deducted from.

 

I do know that they do not take the mobility component of DLA into consideration when deliberating "income" for a fine - however I am uncertain about the Care Component with this. I wouldn't have thought so, but "thinking" does little to answer your question.

 

They cannot attach a deduction of benefit order to any component of DLA or ask for a third party deduction from it; they can to your IS though.

 

I'm afraid that's the only advice I can offer for the moment. If I find out, I will be sure to let you know.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Commiekips seems to have a chip the size of a boulder on his shoulder, seemingly thinking that every person on any kind of benefit is a scrounger for whom he pays personally by working.

 

He conveniently forgets that by and large these people did work, did pay into the system to help people who weren't working then, and that one day no doubt, he won't be working anymore and at that point, people who work will be paying for his benefits, because that's the way this system works.

 

Either that or he's a troll. Take your pick.

 

Indeed bookie I've noticed its not the first time.

 

PF

  • Haha 1

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i do apoligise sicerely got the names mixed up...doh...thanks for pointing it out...yes i hold my hands up too quick of the mark lol

howz u ranger..just been on you site some intresting work going on there dude..

patrickq1

ps thanks HB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Pat, your cheque is now on its way to you! LOL

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We can all see that Commiekips comments have not been helpful. The OP has addressed this herself (or himself as the case may be); though it's very heartening (and helpful) for others to point out when someone has overstepped the mark, it doesn't answer the query at hand. When people keep going back to it, it detracts from the original post.

 

And remember - if you find a post which you find personally abusive (to you or the OP) or if you feel it in some manner is in breach of the forum rules, hit the red triangle on the post to report the matter to site team. I know I am in here frequently but I'm not here all the time so can't see every post made. The triangle sends a report in real time so that mods who are logged on at the time can deal with it.

 

We've moved on from Commiekips' comments, and they have been noted. Let's keep the thread focussed on addressing the OP's query from here, please.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

when i was working as a tiler i was paying on average 350 per week on tax and insurance....if i were well enough i would be out the door first light and graftin till dusk,so i think ime entitled to some benefits but i had to fight for it ,hopefully i get through another couple of ops and get back on my feet again,would nt take me any more than an hour to source work....

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not something that she needs to appeal to benefits about as it is not a decision made by any benefit section.

 

The court have advised her that from their income calculations she is to pay £20 per week. She needs to find out if they have used DLA in that income calculation, and if so whether they can actually do that. She would then need to approach the court about this.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow... So much has gone on. Thanks for the helpful comments. I am not against paying my fine. Ive broke the law so therefore I am going to pay my fine.

 

I'll ring the court office dealing with it and see where they got the figure of £20 from.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...