Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no i meant the email from parcel2go which email address did they send it from and who signed it off (whos name is at the bottom)
    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.    Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.   The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved.  Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
    • It was all my own work based on my previous emails to P2G which Bank has seen.
    • I was referring to #415 where you wrote "I was forced to try to sell - and couldn't." . And nearer the start in #79 .. "I couldn't sell.  I had an incredibly valuable asset. Huge equity.  But the interest accrued / the property market suffered and I couldn't find a buyer even at a level just to clear the debt." In #194 you said you'd tried to sell for four years.  The reason for these points is that a lot of the claims against for example your surveyor, solicitor, broker, the lender and now the receiver are mainly founded in a belief that they should have been able to do something but did not. Things that might seem self evident to you but not necessarily to others. Pressing these claims may well need a bit more hard evidence, rather than an appeal to common sense. Can you show evidence of similar properties, with similar freehold issues, selling readily? And solid reasons why the lender should have been able to sell when you couldn't.
    • You can use a family's address.   The only caveat is for the final hearing you'd need to be there in person   HOWEVER i'd expect them to pay if its only £200 because costs of attending will be higher than that
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Final settlement figure?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5112 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

I found out this week that my brother has got a debt problem. He built up a lot of debt at univerisity, worked out a repayment scheme with his bank, but failed to make some of the payments, and now he has Fairfax Solicitors writing to him.

 

First of all I would like to thank you all for this website, and your very useful posts, it has helped us a lot and made it seem much less daunting knowing that others have been through exactly the same.

 

My brother is prepared to go bankrupt, he owes £9,000 and has no savings or assets. But I am able to lend him some money, and I'm prepared to do that so that he doesn't have to go down that route.

 

We realise that it is possible to offer a smaller amount to write off the debt. We have a template letter which we can use to offer this.

 

I can only afford to lend him £4,000, but I would rather it be less. Am I right in thinking that if he goes bankrupt, they get almost nothing? (I believe they can get some of the tax he pays on his earnings.)

 

If I offered £2,000 - would they be inclined to accept that, rather than force him to go bankrupt? Does anyone have any experience of making offers? Is there a danger of going too low? I am guessing if you make the offer too low, it would be difficult to increase it.

 

I would very much appreciate any advice on this.

 

Dan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For that amount of money your brother doesn't need to go bankrupt, for debts of £15K or less he could consider a Debt Relief Order see;

Debt Relief Order - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

and

Debt Relief Order UK Information Site

 

others will be along soon to advise on making offers. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

What are the debts in relation too e.g. a loan, overdraft?

 

Are there a lot of charges on the account?

 

Has he sat down and created a statement of affairs showing his income and outgoings and his disposable income (if there is any)?

 

In terms of how much to offer it will really depend on whether he has disposable income and how much this is. Generally, personally, I would start at about 10% (don't expect them to accept this though - or any initial offer for that matter as they will want to maximise their income) and put a timescale for them to respond by. Also emphasise the fact that he has looked at bankruptcy but would feel that this would benefit both parties more.

 

The reason I say start at about 10% is that this leaves a lot of room for negotiating. You can always negotiate up but you have absolutely no chance of negotiating down the way.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your quick responses!

 

Cerberusalert, he actually has a meeting with a solicitor to discuss the debt relief order, but doesn't think his monthly disposable income will meet the required level - he has been told that it has to be £50 or less?

 

Rory32, the debt is in relation to credit card. I see what you are saying regarding starting low, and it's interesting that you say they will not accept the starting bid. I was thinking that if you wrote to them and said we can only pay £2000, and they say no, and you then say well how about £3000? They are going to see that you have more money, and try to push you further. I was thinking it would be better to pick a price and say that is literally all we can pay, or go bankrupt. Have you heard of any cases where lower amounts were accepted? And does negotiating on the price useally happen then?

 

And does anyone have any idea generally how much these loans are bought for? How much would a DCA generally pay for a £10,000 debt for example?

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this just one debt on the CC, or a few here and there?

 

As Cerbs said, there is no need to go to the extreme of Bankruptcy. It is a good lever mind, to show the creditors that if they won't accept a lesser amount in F&F settlement, then the only other alternative is BR, and they get nowt!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pennies in the pound, literally as low as 10%, so starting at 10% gets them their money back;)

 

Yep, it has been said that one DCA bought a debt for 6P in the pound!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pennies in the pound, literally as low as 10%, so starting at 10% gets them their money back;)

 

I'm sure it would be even less than that if they thought he was going to go bankrupt. There is a thread on here where someone has offered 5% and had it accepted.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the 5% was Dotty. They are so desperate just now that they will probably accept washers!:lol:

 

Sod it, I've probably offered too much then.

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this just one debt on the CC, or a few here and there?

 

Bazooka Boo, it is just one debt.

 

Thank you for comments.

 

Is it true that if the DCA takes this to court, before my brother can file for bankrupcy, he then has to wait for the court hearing? And so is making an offer and threatening bankrupcy, risking that they may immeadiatley take this to court, to prevent him going bankrupt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bazooka Boo, it is just one debt.

 

Thank you for comments.

 

Is it true that if the DCA takes this to court, before my brother can file for bankrupcy, he then has to wait for the court hearing? And so is making an offer and threatening bankrupcy, risking that they may immeadiatley take this to court, to prevent him going bankrupt?

 

This isn't the case, if a debtor declares themselves bankrupt and includes the debt before it goes to court, then the case is effectively discontinued - with all of its liabilities.

 

How can the courts enforce a debt that is included in a BR? and neither can a court cannot dismiss BR as an option before the case is actually brought before a judge. it would just make the plaintiff look a little stupid when the judge tells them they cannot continue

 

However, it is quite true that a lot of financial institutions will attempt to get the debt tquickly through the courts and ramp up the costs etc once they get wind of an intended BR - so that if there is any financial payout by the OR then they may get a larger share

Link to post
Share on other sites

5% is nice and go for it, what do have to lose

 

Personally, and if there is NO CCA, I would wade in at 10%.

 

when they refuse this go to 15-20 tell them this really is my last offer and offer a £1 a month based on my monthly outgoings as an alternative

 

Faced with £1 a month for next 100 years or a 15- 20% they will bite your hand off and if they are really desperate they will take your first offer

 

.....oh and going bankrupt is dumb. I would never advise anyone to go bankrupt, not when there is such a thing as a CCA

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does your brother still have an outstanding student loan?

 

I believe that Student Loans (amongst other debts) will be left extant after bankruptcy and will still have to be paid. In my case, when I considered the option of bankruptcy, my outstanding student loan an £15K+ and CCJ against me for damages claim (personal injuries) for £26K would still have to be paid - so I dismissed the BR option.

 

Just something to bear in mind.

 

In the great scheme of things, £9K debt doesn't seem so much - especially when most debt repayments can be "managed".

 

Perhaps not the best idea helping him out financially - but that's only my opinion.

 

Wish you luck!

 

Impecunious! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to ask this on your post. I'm new to the website.

Does anyone know if I apply for a Debt Relief Order I will have to meet with an approved intermediary advisor face to face to make the aplication and show my documents or everything will be dealt with by phone, email and post?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the 5% was Dotty. They are so desperate just now that they will probably accept washers!:lol:

I wonder if I can get away with offering 5%. :eek::D I'm close in closing one account (750 left not even close on the other 5) how much can I get away offering on the 750 one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to ask this on your post. I'm new to the website.

Does anyone know if I apply for a Debt Relief Order I will have to meet with an approved intermediary advisor face to face to make the aplication and show my documents or everything will be dealt with by phone, email and post?

 

If you click on this link;Formal Solutions: Bankruptcy, Administration Orders and IVAs - The Consumer Forums

It should take you to the formal solution threads, scroll down to the bottom of the page and you'll see a blue button with the words 'new thread' in it, click on that and you can start your own thread.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...