Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My Ebay account was permanently suspended for "buying activity" allegation. I literally have no idea what they are talking about.   It's literally impossible to contact them by email or phone if your account has been suspended. They owe me: 1. £400 for items sold which have been delievered to the buyer 2. £350 for a faulty computer screen I purchased , which I now can't return. It's unacceptable they should hold my monies under these circumstances.I have video evidence the computer screen is faulty. But its completely frustrating, because you cannot under ANY circumstances contact  them by email or phone if your account has been suspended. So I cannot find out what guidelines I'm supposed to have broken. I'm not prepared to accpet this. I have Ebay's physical address. I am going to go to the small claims court, and appoint bailiffs `if I win and they don't pay up. Do you think Trading Standards would be interested? Or is there an Ombudsman to go to? With literally millions of accounts, this must be happening all the time. Ebay must be retaining millions of pounds under false pretences. Is it not the law you can retrun a faulty item bought over the internet, whether from ebay, or anywhere else?
    • Although this situation is mildly disturbing like a fly trapped behind the curtain on a warm day, your creative responses are always a joy to read, Dave. Cheers. Will send across. 
    • Hi I stupidly left my handbrake off,  and my car rolled down a hill and into a fence owned by a company. I am a part owner of the company that owns the fence. My car insurance (Prima) states they won't cover the damage to the fence, just the car as they state  "you own the land', although I don't and I did make that clear to them when reporting the accident.. I understood a company is a separate legal entity, so should be considered third party damage and car insurance should cover? The property has a £400 excess and I'm already going to be paying out the £500 excess on car insurance, so want to avoid paying both if I can.. Thanks for any advice you can give...
    • Lowell , Cabot etc, I'm not sure how I can politely put this, but F taking money from your kids mouths to pay them!
    • Yes, they are digging themselves into a ditch, with regard to people like you who fight back. Remember that, sadly, the vast majority of motorists who get these tickets think they are fines, that companies like ECP have some sort of official status, and give in and pay. They are just putting barriers in your way and encouraging you to fold. How about this as a reply - Dear ECP, Re: Subject Access Request PCN no.XXXXX I refer to my Subject Access Request dated XXXXX and received by yourselves on XXXXX. Thank you for your bizarre letter of 23 April.  Your letter requests Photo ID - which I have already sent to you.  The letter also requests proof of ownership of the vehicle - this is impossible to produce as the vehicle in question was on hire. In any case requests for proof of ownership are silly given your PCNs invite registered keepers to nominate drivers who do not own vehicles. I note all this concern for correct identity was absent when you decided to send letters threatening me with all & sundry if I didn't pay you money! The SAR was received on XXXXX.  I have already sent Photo ID.  The clock is ticking.  I am well aware that I would have the right to complain to the ICO and to sue you for not respecting your statutory duty should you not respect the 30-day deadline. Tick, tock. Yours, XXXXX
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Anyone taken PayPal to the Small Claims over witheld money?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5151 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Fair comment. I just think it should be less for smaller less expensive items.

 

PS. £25 was the starting/reserve price.

 

They already took £1.10 from my Paypal account. I thought that was their commission, as the listing fee was only 10p.

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's nothing to do with the T's&C's Jimmy. I could have sold elsewhere, but would anyone have seen it. Maybe so, but not many. I can't even think of another auction site but would seriously consider switching if there was one with enough buyers and sellers.

 

Just to save me boring myself with the T's&C's, could you tell me what their commission is on every hundred pounds? I can work any sales commission in the future from that.

 

Cheers Big Ears.

 

 

SOD'EM

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I cannot because it edepends on the item category, your ststus with ebay, whether you area business or private seller, whether you list when they have any offer on.

 

All clearly on their site. Search for 'fees' and it will all come up.

 

Hope that helps, big nose.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm...

 

Since the service is limited to E-money, which does not qualify as a deposit or an investment service in the sense of the Law, you are not protected by the Luxembourg deposit guarantee schemes provided by the Association pour la Garantie des Dépôts Luxembourg (AGDL). PayPal enables you to make payments to and accept payments from third parties. PayPal is an independent contractor for all purposes. PayPal does not have control of nor assumes the liability or legality for the products or services that are paid for with our Service. We do not guarantee the identity of any User or ensure that a buyer or a seller will complete a transaction.

 

Underlining for emphasis is mine.

 

On what basis does Paypal then withold funds and fundamentally alter the contract between the seller and buyer? :confused:

In knowledge lies wisdom

 

Mo - not even a bar-stool lawyer, but I'll help where I can...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On what basis does Paypal then withold funds and fundamentally alter the contract between the seller and buyer?

 

Presumably on the basis that they offer greater protection for ebay sales than they do for other transactions. Nobody would buy a high value item on ebay from a new seller without this protection. In return for providing ebayers with the confidence to trade with newbies they put certain safeguards in place. Their ball, their game, their rules.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On what basis does Paypal then withold funds and fundamentally alter the contract between the seller and buyer? :confused:

 

The fundamental alteration is based upon a figment of your own imagination, presumably.

 

In the mean time, what actually happens is that Paypal upholds the terms of the Paypal User Agreement, as agreed by every member, while the contract between a buyer and a seller is absolutely unaffected.

 

Whatever happens with a payment made to Paypal, the buyer or the seller owns the right to enforce the contract of sale. If Paypal refunds a payment the seller could sue the buyer none the less, or if Paypal refuse a refund the buyer could sue the seller none the less, and may well be better off to do so anyway because the rights of a consumer, granted by law, extend a good deal further than what is rumoured to be the usual practice of Paypal.

 

:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You know what? I used to *really* respect CAG as a place where people could come and discuss ways to protect consumer rights. Where people were willing to discuss and investigate openly and without rancour find legal ways around dodgy malpractices.

Yeah, lots of blanks were fired in the process, but ideas were exchanged and ways found to negate and nulify illegal practices.

Ask any bank how they feel about CAG.

Ask any DCA how they feel about CAG.

 

But that doesnt seem to be the case anymore. Now it seems this place is just shill city.

 

Hope you guys are all happy, and PayPal is paying you enough to screw up Consumer Action Group for them.

In knowledge lies wisdom

 

Mo - not even a bar-stool lawyer, but I'll help where I can...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And who exactly is that aimed at?

 

If you want the bottom line, Paypal are doing what you agreed they could do. I hate paypal with a passion and would never use them under any circumstanecs and cirtainly do not work for or support them in any way.

 

But your argument must be based on facts. the fact is you signed up and thus agreed that they can do this. No point throwing toys out the pram if you don't like the truth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And who exactly is that aimed at?

 

If you want the bottom line, Paypal are doing what you agreed they could do. I hate paypal with a passion and would never use them under any circumstanecs and cirtainly do not work for or support them in any way.

 

But your argument must be based on facts. the fact is you signed up and thus agreed that they can do this. No point throwing toys out the pram if you don't like the truth.

 

 

If the cap fits, wear it matey. Just be cause a company (eBay) forces you to use another company (PayPal) doesnt constitute "Oh I signed this, so tough on me."

As members of something called Consumer Action Group, where we percieve a problem with what a company is doing, our aim is to redress that if possible, or to discover ways in which consumers (forced consumers in this case) can at worst negate the effects of that companies dodgy practices, or at best put a stop to them.

You say you "hate PayPal with a passion? Sorry, I'm missing your passionate wish to put any kind of shot across their bows - rather I see your pasionate wish to just bite down harder each time they shaft us again, just because... well, you signed up.

In other areas of CAG, you probably signed a loan agreement - that isnt going to stop you using the law to tell a DCA to go FT when they come after you without a copy of the agreement, or when they're terms and conditions are shown correctly, or they're out of statute, or they told a porky on the POC.

In short, like I said - if the cap fits wear it.

If you arent interested in finding ways to kick PayPal in the nuts, thats fine with me, but take your smirky "Well, you signed up..." shpiel off to your own thread - I can suggest a title if you're stuck for ideas - and maybe some others will feel more inclined to chuck some POSITIVE ideas around, which in my experience has been the more normal behaviour on CAG.

 

Have a honey of a day.

In knowledge lies wisdom

 

Mo - not even a bar-stool lawyer, but I'll help where I can...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The convincing way to kick Paypal in the nuts is to refuse to use it.

 

On ebay.de the vast majority of sellers who sell to the home market (not abroad) continue to accept payments by bank transfer, as they always did, because they think it daft to pay an extra fee to Paypal, and the buyer are content with this, as they always were, because it works.

 

Therefore, because the sellers have the sense to think it through as far as that, Paypal is not yet forced on the German site for fear of an exodus of sellers were ebay so reckless.

 

In the UK the punters are that much more like dogs sat on thistles, somehow expecting somebody to heed their howling but without the sense to shift their rear ends from the cause of the pain.

 

:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The convincing way to kick Paypal in the nuts is to refuse to use it.

 

On ebay.de the vast majority of sellers who sell to the home market (not abroad) continue to accept payments by bank transfer, as they always did, because they think it daft to pay an extra fee to Paypal, and the buyer are content with this, as they always were, because it works.

 

Therefore, because the sellers have the sense to think it through as far as that, Paypal is not yet forced on the German site for fear of an exodus of sellers were ebay so reckless.

 

In the UK the punters are that much more like dogs sat on thistles, somehow expecting somebody to heed their howling but without the sense to shift their rear ends from the cause of the pain.

 

:eek:

 

Are you aware of how you actually don't use Paypal in the UK though? By which I mean, not are you aware we must use it, I know you are - but in terms of fine details? Like we are told by eBay "You MUST offer PayPal" - and that seems to transmit as "You must accept payment by PayPal if the buyer offers it." Can they make you accept Paypal legally? I would have thought not?

I'm contemplating putting on a couple of items on the basis of "If you'll be paying cash on collection, I will discount your winning bid by 10%" That seems entirely sensible to me, since PayPal will a) screw me around and b) screw a load of fees out of me anyway.

 

Question is, do I fall foul of some deliberately obscure eBay/PayPal cartel rule by doing that?

 

For the record my feedback is now an exemplary 100% now over 14 items, 9 sold, and I'm always upfront with my buyers and bidders who contact me during auctions as to who they are actually dealing with via my bands MySpace page - they know they're not dealing with some pikey out to tuck them up.

In knowledge lies wisdom

 

Mo - not even a bar-stool lawyer, but I'll help where I can...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They not only tell the UK sellers that they must offer Paypal, ebay items fail to appear on ebay.co.uk if listed on another site where the sellers are not obliged to offer Paypal and the sellers fail to.

 

None the less, a good proportion of German sellers would continue to prefer to sell to Germany only, rather than be bothered with any of that.

 

Were a competitor to complain about the virtual monopoly I dare say that a court of law would be no more keen on it than the German sellers, but in the mean time it is much more fun to watch eBay continue to shoot itself in the foot. If you read the reports to shareholders you will find that eBay is not so much more keen on Paypal than anybody else is, because it is badly managed. Paypal struggles to cope on an international basis if only because the regulation of money is that much more strict in some parts of the World. None the less, eBay is stuck with it, there being no viable opportunity to offload Paypal now that the damage is done, in terms of the value of ebay shares over the past five years.

 

:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can they make you accept Paypal legally?

 

As has been pointed out they tend to cave if challenged but in the grand scheme of things this is worth it to them. Sellers don't get their money that much faster if they fight it anyway. It is heartbreaking to hear of people needing to sell their possessions in order to pay bills and then finding they won't get the money for ages. I suppose the principle is not that much different to an auction house insisting on payment by cash and only ever paying out by cheque, the clearance time is different but the payout is still not instant for the seller.

 

Selling on ebay is not simple and isn't problem free, whatever their advertising says.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...