Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How long will sky own the telephone line?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5125 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have cancelled my Sky Broadband and sky talk, due to the new changes taking place in their t&c's on the 29-03-2010. Although the changes are minimal, i saw the chance to be able to end my contract, before the 12 mont period.

I informed them and i received an email saying that i could leave them without penalty.

My contract ends on the 29-03-2010, the day their changes take place. However, they say it will take another ten days therafter, to disconnect completley.

I will be looking for a new provider of broadband and telephone and i am not bothered if it takes a while longer. However, when i call other companies to ask about their services, they say that Sky own the line and unfortunatley the cost could be anything from £69.00 to £160, that i would have to pay, the new provider, to take over the line.

 

My question is, how long does Sky own the Line?

I would have thought once my contract has ended, plus the 10 days that Sky say's it needs to disconnect everything, that the line would then become free again, so that i could perhaps take up an offer in the future, from a different provider, that may have offers to new customers.

 

Can anyone help with this question, i would be very grateful,

thank you, Shalaz.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What changes are taking place in the t&c's? I've not heard anything about this even though I'm a sky customer (though I did only sign up just over a month ago, so I might already be on the new t&c's to begin with)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not a case of who owns the line as such.

 

The piece of wire from your house plugs into equipment at the exchange which in your case sounds like it's Sky's equipment.

 

All providers have to get [bT] Openreach to physically remove the wire from the previous provider's equipment and plug it into the new one.

 

Openreach can levy a charge for that which the new provider passes on to you. Or not, sometimes they subsidise it in order to gain you as a customer.

 

So in theory every time you change provider you'll incur a charge.

 

Unless your provider is not a true provider and simply reselling a BT service, and you're changing from BT - for instance, to the Post Office, in which case nothing need be unplugged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have cancelled my Sky Broadband and sky talk, due to the new changes taking place in their t&c's on the 29-03-2010. Although the changes are minimal, i saw the chance to be able to end my contract, before the 12 mont period.

I informed them and i received an email saying that i could leave them without penalty.

My contract ends on the 29-03-2010, the day their changes take place. However, they say it will take another ten days therafter, to disconnect completley.

I will be looking for a new provider of broadband and telephone and i am not bothered if it takes a while longer. However, when i call other companies to ask about their services, they say that Sky own the line and unfortunatley the cost could be anything from £69.00 to £160, that i would have to pay, the new provider, to take over the line.

 

My question is, how long does Sky own the Line?

I would have thought once my contract has ended, plus the 10 days that Sky say's it needs to disconnect everything, that the line would then become free again, so that i could perhaps take up an offer in the future, from a different provider, that may have offers to new customers.

 

Can anyone help with this question, i would be very grateful,

thank you, Shalaz.

This is one of the main problems with "unbundled" phone lines. Once they are unplugged from BT's equipment in the exchange and plugged into someone else's, other providers have problems sorting things out. BT will be able to return your line to them, but they will hold you to a minimum term. If you are in receipt of any of the applicable benefits, you could go on to BT Basic which is really good value (about £12.50 per quater!).

 

Here is some info on BT Basic! A simple guide to BT Basic - BT's Inclusive Communications Website

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Maxxpower,

the changes that are taking place are in the Sky Broadband and Sky Talk subscription pakkages. They are very subtle, and take place on the 29th of this month.

 

The changes, i have been told, are very subtle.

 

Sky Broadband S.A. who provide you with sky broadband and talk services, will be replaced by, Brithish Sky Broadcasting Limited.

The other changes are to condition 7.5 of the Sky Talk Contract and condition 2(i) of the Sky Broadband contract. mainly about how they will notify you if they modify or temporarily suspend your services, if they need to carry out repairs etc.

I am afraid my scanner is not working, so i cant scan it in for you. However, a full set of the updated terms and conditions are available at:

sky.com/products or you can request a copy by post.

 

I used these small changes in my contract, to cancel my broadband and talk pakkage. Sky is too expensive for me now. My 12 month contract was due to end, at the end of june. I used their changes to my advantage, since it said, "if you are happy to accept these new terms, simply continue to pay your subscription, otherwise, if you no longer wish to receive Sky Talk and or Sky Broadband services, you must contact them at least 7 days before 29 March 2010.

 

I did receive my letter in January, perhaps they have not sent you one of these letters, or it is missing in the post. They have to send them to all customers, even you, Because the changes have not yet taken place

 

I called them and no one seemed to know much about any of it. But in the end i got there.

You have to call the cancellations department for Sky Broadband and Talk, explain that you do not accept the changes taking place on the 29-03-2010 and that should cancel out the contract.

I have received a letter confirming the cancellation for the 29th, with no penalty charges, since it is Sky who are changing the T&c's etc.

 

Shalaz

Link to post
Share on other sites

BT Basic 'good value'? I beg to differ. The tariff (Low User) worked out at £18.50pm Quarter around £6pm. Half that of BT 'Basic'. No doubt one of the reasons BT got rid of it.

 

BT basic is £13.50 per quater (not £12.50 as I previously posted) and includes £4.50 of calls in that. Thats only £4.50 per month, with £1.50 per month of calls.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

what you should have done is - for info in case others need it

 

request to opt out of the sky network and then 5 days later contact a new provider to transfer the line over and after 2 days call sky and say you are getting a new provider re the policy changes

 

you need to put this in process in the next 5 days for it too work out ;)

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
BT basic is £13.50 per quater (not £12.50 as I previously posted) and includes £4.50 of calls in that. Thats only £4.50 per month, with £1.50 per month of calls.

 

It might be good value....but its only available if you're jobless or a pensioner.

 

Am I eligable for BT Basic? - BT's Inclusive Communications Website

 

You can usually get BT Basic if you are claiming one of the benefits below:

  • Income Support
  • Income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance
  • Employment Support Allowance (Income related) or
  • Pensions Credit (Guaranteed Credit)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...