Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks, dx. Yes, I may need to turn my attention into some other things.
    • no they wont  can you PLEASE stop panicking about a nothing burger   dx  
    • Where a person who owns or partially owns a property enters into an IVA, it's usual practice that in the fifth year, the person has to attempt to re-mortgage the property to release equity. It's extremely rare that a homeowner will be successful in re-mortgaging due to having a poor credit rating. Where the owner is unable to re-mortgage, the IVA is extended for a further year. This is absolutely normal practice in an IVA, and if your sister cancels payments to the IVA, the IVA is at risk of failing and she could be made bankrupt, therefore losing any equity she has in the property. 
    • Right. So I think it would be  good idea to give a brief description of the property, for example detached house, or flat or terraced. And some sort of identifier so we can distinguish from other properties you handle. An incomplete street address eg "No.14" would do so while preserving your privacy. Is the freehold title discrete for the property, or does it cover other leasehold properties? And a bit about your history, how current ownership came about. At one stage you said it used to be your family home, elsewhere you wrote that you'd bought the leasehold. Did those comments refer to this property? Did you acquire it on the open market, or from your family? Is this the house with the garages, where you own the freehold? Trying to understand whether there are underlying reasons that might account for problems with valuation, eligibility for finance, and the fact that neither you nor Lender found it possible to sell. Finally (for the moment) you refer to existing litigation. Does that relate to this property? If so it would be good to give a brief overview. Civil or criminal? What role do play .. claimant, defendant, appellant, respondent?  Charge, or cause of action. You don't want to go off on separate path that would better joined to the current proceedings. 
    • Can you confirm the client on the letter please? Is it The Original Energy Provider or PRAC Energy? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

council tax summons and charges help pls


jennier600
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5173 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i recentlydue to the stress of my daughter taking overdose,then mum being hit by a hit and run driver simply didnt check to make sure enough money in bank to cover dd of council tax.i wrote to them when they wrote to say they had cancled dd to explain and asked them to reinstate dd and asked to pay outstanding 200 in installments on top of regular payment till cleared .they wrote stating the would reinstate dd but wanted 200 in full.i cant give them what i havent got so wrote back asking if they could pls arrange a monthly payment as i simply had not got 200 to pay in full.i then got a court summons with 70 added on top of 200 and i dont know what to do if couldnt pay 22 how do they expect me to [pay 270.im willing to pay at a rate i can afford and it would be struggle but my debt but what can i do pls help im so worried:confused: i should add i got this two weeks ago only my mum took fall fractured vertobra and in hospital so im stressed to max and need help as what to do reply expected before 3 march of them

Edited by jennier600
add more info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not a foregone conclusion that the Court hearing WILL take place-you need to go down to their office in person and speak to someone.

They may then stop the hearing.

Take any proof of your financial situation and any other things which you think they should be taking into account.

If you show them that you are NOT purposely seeking to evade payment,then that changes things.

At this stage I think its essential that you go to them-dont leave it.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i recentlydue to the stress of my daughter taking overdose,then mum being hit by a hit and run driver simply didnt check to make sure enough money in bank to cover dd of council tax.i wrote to them when they wrote to say they had cancled dd to explain and asked them to reinstate dd and asked to pay outstanding 200 in installments on top of regular payment till cleared .they wrote stating the would reinstate dd but wanted 200 in full.i cant give them what i havent got so wrote back asking if they could pls arrange a monthly payment as i simply had not got 200 to pay in full.i then got a court summons with 70 added on top of 200 and i dont know what to do if couldnt pay 22 how do they expect me to [pay 270.im willing to pay at a rate i can afford and it would be struggle but my debt but what can i do pls help im so worried:confused: i should add i got this two weeks ago only my mum took fall fractured vertobra and in hospital so im stressed to max and need help as what to do reply expected before 3 march of them

 

Do not worry the court would be on your side and would decide what you can afford to pay it's a better that way like that once it has been decided in court the council tax people cannot changed it. The minimum the court would ask you to pay is £2.00 sometimes going to court is a good thing I was sent to court by my council when i went back to work after having my first child and become instantly arrears with one month rent of course i couldn't pay it in one go and made an offer of £20 per month with my main monthly rent the council would not have it the woman then file for a court proceeding when both court papers was file in court she has told lies about me the papers the council and myself sent to court befor the proceeding didn't match the council then got the cheek to ring me at work and ask me to withdraw because they decided to accept my offer of course i refused point blank and went to court. The court told me to pay the minimum amount of £2.00 :D the council woman got the cheek not to turn up in court and send a young colleague which didn't have a clue what to say to the judge in the end she was sacked for sending another 19 people to court of course I kept to my £2.00 payment teach them a lesson. I would advice you to go to court you would be better off that £70 extra is for the court case which the council has slap on your arrears they've took it is your fault for not having enough fund.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not a foregone conclusion that the Court hearing WILL take place-you need to go down to their office in person and speak to someone.

They may then stop the hearing.

Take any proof of your financial situation and any other things which you think they should be taking into account.

If you show them that you are NOT purposely seeking to evade payment,then that changes things.

At this stage I think its essential that you go to them-dont leave it.

 

Good advice there also.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with everything said here, jennier. Don't over worry yourself. If you are able to attend the hearing please do so. I can't speak for every council, but in my area you don't see a magistrate. Instead it'll be one or two people from the Revenues dept of the council. They are very understanding and you can come to an arrangement that is affordable and sustainable.

If you can't get to the court then do call in to your council offices to discuss this.

Either way do take along any income / expense information and do explain your current circumstances.

Best wishes.

Rae.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thankyou so much for all your advice im so gratful as ive been so stressed out as i thought they would continue to increase the ammount .i can understand how people find them self in debt when they do this its so unfair .when i rang they said put it in writting and didnt discuss.thankyou all for taking the time to reply.x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...