Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

S.R.J. Debt Recovery & SKY


ratbag1970
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5141 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received a letter today from S.R.J Recoveries informing me that I owe SKY £60.00. I haven't had Sky tv since I canceled the contract at least 6 or 7 years ago, at my previous address, and to the best of my knowledge I owe them nothing.

I have had no correspondence from SKY or anyone representing them since then until today. I moved to my current address 2 years ago. I phoned them this afternoon and was informed this debt is from 2005!! I am not disputing I had an account with Sky, but I am not convinced I owe them anything.

If I did, a) I would have paid it when I canceled the contract or b) I would have paid them on the phone.

The nice (!) lady on the phone said I should write in informing them that I am disputing the amount owed. I'm not entirely sure how to word the letter. Also she informed me on the phone that they have had a lot of accounts in from SKY from 2005 and they have had a lot of calls from customers disputing the amounts owed. She also kindly mentioned that "Was it really worth incurring all the extra fees and costs for the sake of £60.00? It would be cheaper for me to just pay it over the phone now."

Some advice would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your responses. I must admit, the letter has got me asking myself do I actually owe the £60.00? Clearly I'm not about to hand it over without some kind of proof. As far as I can remember there has been nothing paid to SKY for at least 6 years, so I think I will send them the statute barred letter and see how it goes. And I completely agree about it being a nice little earner, if I had been less suspicious, I may have paid it!!! Depending on the response to the statue barred letter, I may well speak to trading standards. I have been nosing around regarding this company, and like a lot of them they don't seem to care about the legalities of debt collection. I thin the term "Bottom Feeders" was used in one particular post!

 

The only concern is that SRJ are saying that the debt is from 2005, which would only make the debt 5 years old not 6. The debt wouldn't be statute barred.

 

Many Thanks.

Edited by ratbag1970
Link to post
Share on other sites

Im just getting more curious here now, £60 is a nice round figure, almost as if you'd moved home and requested that they provide sky at a new address. For which they charge around £60, ( install phone and hook up).

maybe, it would be wise to enquire to sky about this. ( not over the phone you'll be there for 8 hours:D).

Just a thought

Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny you should say that, my daughter has just said she received a similar letter, only SRJ told her to ring SKY to query it and once she got through, they offered her a special SKY package!!!!!

Is there any possibility you can give me an idea who I should email/write to regarding SKY?

To be honest it's so long ago I have no paper-work regarding the account with SKY. There is nothing on my credit report relating to it either, I am 99% positive I don't owe them anything but it really has got me questioning it. I am also 99% certain it was at least 6 years ago not 5. Even though I canceled the contract with SKY, I had a SKY Freeview card and I'm positively sure if I had owed them anything they would have contacted me, repeatedly at the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only concern is that SRJ are saying that the debt is from 2005, which would only make the debt 5 years old not 6. The debt wouldn't be statute barred.

 

 

The number 1 rule with debt collectors (After the one that says "Don't speak to them on the phone";)) is don't believe a word they say. Anything they haven't put in writing is probably a lie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The number 1 rule with debt collectors (After the one that says "Don't speak to them on the phone";)) is don't believe a word they say. Anything they haven't put in writing is probably a lie.

 

Ok, I was irritated. I never usually contact a DCA by phone. Letter already in the post, no signature!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't re-sign with SKY if they paid ME a monthly fee :D. Half the channels available on Freeview or Freesat SKY charge for!!!

TBH, if someone owed me money from years previously, I wouldn't lend them money or offer them a service without being paid first!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have just received a Trace confirmation letter from S R J.also regarding a so called debt from SKY from 2005,I did have sky and had for a few years, but moved in 2004 having cancelled the contract in the correct way so was suspicious.Since I received the original letter which just stated that a trace had been put on me.I will type what letter says, its easier that way.(We have failed to receive a response to previouss correspondence and have therefore made tracing enquires for confirmation of your current place of residence,information has been received confirming your address details have changed to this address.Please contact us immediately on 08453137203 qouting the above reference number.)(Big Brother or what!!) I changed my name legally in 2004 following a divorce and have moved from the original address they say the debt is from 3 times!!!I finished my account with sky more than 6 years ago and all monies owing on the account were payed.I asked S R J for details from sky about the so called debt and was told they did'nt have to give them to me,so I did some research online and found I am not the only one who is being harrassed by this company.Having done my research and received some advice I phoned them back and told them that I will not be paying the so called debt they had purchased from Sky and anyway as it was over 6 years old even though I was told last week it was passed to them in January 2005.I know I had moved from that address and my post was redirected anyway and I certainly had no correspondence from Sky.I told them I was photo copying there letter and giving copies of it to my local MP, the trading standards authority and the local police.I firmly believe these bottom feeders should be stopped at all cost as other people may just pay up,there are a lot of vunerable people out there.Does anyone thing this is the right way to deal with companies like this or is there another way? Would value feedback as I feel for all the people who may be unable to deal with such companies who seem to make the rules up to siut themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SRJ are hilarious:D

 

You can bait these cluless morons till the cows come home, i am extremely surprised they can even manage to organise a workforce, least of all continue sending out red headed fabricated debts.

 

Send copies of any drivel they send to the OFT and TS via Consumer Direct, to investigate.

 

I wouldn't pay them just out of principle, send them £60 in monopoly money...:D

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its companies like this that could easily send out about a thousand letters like this in a month asking for £60, if only one hundred pay up then it’s a nice earner

And when they are caught out they will simply put it down as a “Computer Error” or something.

If I did that and sent out letters to people claiming they owed money but they didn’t then I would be put in prison for obtaining money by deception.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought I'd update the thread. I have received a response from SRJ in relation to the general debt letter of "No Knowledge" I sent them. The letter reads as follows dated the 19/03/10:

 

"We thank you for your recent communication and note the contents. We confirm that we are taking instructions from our client and will revert to you shortly. In the meantime, we have placed the account on hold. "

 

I can't wait for the next letter to arrive!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They must of bought a job lot of old debts off Sky... got a letter today saying "pending litigation" "we've traced you"

 

It's for an old Sky bill of £35... now when I was moving over 6 years ago I called up and tried to cancel/give notice to Sky, but their computers were down and the guy I spoke to was very rude to me... I just cancelled my DD and disconnected the Skybox.

 

Now they have sent in these clowns to try and recover the money! they can Foxtrot Oscar for sure! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Now that shows you how really sad and desperate these people are, attempting to get a CCJ for £35!:lol:

 

The DJ would laugh them out of court..

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...