Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Could this potentially be unfair dismissal?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5192 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I posted a while back about work problems.

 

Basically I'm a director in my fathers business with a 10% shareholding and my brother who also works there has 10% too. My father holds the remaining 80%. My sister who doesn't work in the family business comes in once or twice a week to advise on the finances - she works full time elsewhere as an accountant. My sisters boyfriend also works in the company.

 

I don't get along with my sister or my Dad. It worsened after my Mum died a year ago. She also worked in the family business but kept my Dad off my back.

 

They disciplined me in October because I used my company car to travel to a second job (p/t bar work). They called it gross misconduct and I got a final warning (my first ever disciplinary/warning) and their decision was upheld on appeal. My father chaired the disciplinary and the appeal!

 

I have kept my nose clean (I thought) since then. My father threatened me with redundancy before Christmas but I threatened him with court and he backed down. My sister and my husband had a heated phone conversation after this and she told him that they hated me and were trying to make me leave. I have told my Dad I'll leave if/when I can find another job but there's not a lot out there at the moment.

 

Yesterday I was given 2 letters inviting me to another 2 disciplinary hearings.

 

One is for competence - they have kept a list of every minor mistake I have made at work for the past 6 months. The list includes stacking things differently to them, putting invoices in the wrong tray etc.

 

The second hearing is because a friend came in, I did a job for him and paid for it myself because I owed him a favour. I paid the full price - we have a price list at the till and I followed that but apparently I should have asked my sisters boyfriend to confirm the price. Bear in mind I have worked there for 20 + years and her boyfriend has been there for 2 years. He obviously knows whats happening - he must be the one telling my sister when I make "mistakes". Over the past year I have had any responsibility taken from me. I am not allowed access to computers, filing cabinets, safe, accounts etc. anymore. The boyfriend constantly makes sly remarks to me and puts me down as does my father and sister. If I'm told one more time everyone hates me I'll begin to believe it -lol.

 

I think they're going to sack me this time. My sister is chairing the disciplinary hearing this time despite the fact she's not employed by the company - my father has announced he's made her a manager and everything she does is done with his blessing.

 

I am going to submit a grievance on Monday about bullying by my father, sister and her boyfriend despite the fact it's my father as managing director who will deal with it.

 

If I get sacked do you think I'll have a case for unfair dismissal? I am the only person the company has ever disciplined despite other people making mistakes.

 

I'm panicking a bit because my wage is needed to pay my mortgage etc. I have 2 children who my Dad sees regularly - he collects them from my house and drops them off again without getting out of his car. My Dad knows we rely on my wage. I don't understand why he's potentially risking the roof over his only grandchildrens heads.

 

Sorry for the long post!

Edited by calamityjane
Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke to a solicitor yesterday and he says it sounds like they're trying to get to get rid of me. I don't know if this will be classed as unfair dismissal which at least would hopefully award me some money to keep me going for a while.

 

Basically this is a family feud.

 

I was told in writing in October that the title of director is separate from my employee status.

 

I'm just incredibly worried about my potential lack of earnings. Last night I was awake most of the night trying to figure out how we can manage without my salary if they do sack me in 2 weeks time which is when the "impartial" hearing is.

 

I think because I'm already on a final warning they can get me out the business fairly easily. My sister thinks she's very clever - because she got a degree in accountancy while my brother and I entered the family firm. She seems to be following the ACAS guidelines but skewed in her favour! She honestly thinks everything is being done by the book. She seems to forget the "conversation" her and my husband had in December where she said they were trying to get rid of me. I thought it was said in anger but she must have meant it.

Edited by calamityjane
Link to post
Share on other sites

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I handed a letter in today disputing all allegations. I suppose it won't do any good but I feel I need to do something. The lawyer I spoke to was lovely on the phone but charges £180 an hour if I want to use him - money I just don't have.

 

I'm only allowed to take a colleague or a union rep in with me but I'm not in a union and my colleagues are obviously looking out for their own jobs and some are influenced by my father so probably don't want to get involved.

 

I feel so low - I've felt physically sick all day and have hardly slept since I got the letters. I am the main wage earner and feel I'm letting my husband and children down - especially as I thought I was in a relatively secure job for life.

 

All I can do is sit it out and see what happens..........................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tape the meeting - record it.

You dont have to tell them because it involves you directly. Say as little as possible. Reasonably ask them to provide proof of your "inadequacies" - if they are as arrogant as you say, you will be surprised at how a challenge like this can wind them up, then hope for the mistakes they can make.

Speak slowly and deliberately and show that you are not intimidated by their "superiority", but admit to nothing.

Do you see where this is going? Become the questioner, but innocently.

Indirectly challenge their authority by placing the onus right on their shoulders.

And keep the tape running.

They dont sound too clever so you should get a result!

Best of luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The hearing has been postponed. I put a grievance in for bullying by my sister and the fact she told my husband the were trying to make me leave. I got a letter today saying its postponed until the grievance is dealt with.

 

My brother made 2 mistakes at work today. I've kept a note of them too, if they discipline me for mistakes then surely they've got to do the same to others making mistakes.

 

Is this a good sign? How can she discipline me if she's made it clear she wants me out the business?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm only allowed to take a colleague or a union rep in with me but I'm not in a union and my colleagues are obviously looking out for their own jobs and some are influenced by my father so probably don't want to get involved.

 

Can they actually tell you who you can bring to the meeting?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm only allowed to take a colleague or a union rep in with me but I'm not in a union and my colleagues are obviously looking out for their own jobs and some are influenced by my father so probably don't want to get involved.

 

Can they actually tell you who you can bring to the meeting?

 

Work colleague or union rep is the legal minimum, your contract may allow for more.

There was a case in the high court last year that caused ACAS to change its guidelines. Unsafe under the human rights act if I recall correctly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right - I now have a letter about my grievance.

It says my brother is to chair the grievance hearing although he's not been asked/told yet. The office manager is to hold the investigation into my allegations - the letter says I have to prove my claim of bullying with dates/times etc. If the grievance is found to be malicious it will be classed as misconduct and I will be disciplined for that which could result in my dismissal. Once this grievance hearing has been held, depending on the outcome, my disciplinary hearing will be rescheduled where I could be dismissed.

I feel I'm banging my head against a brick wall. All I want is an impartial hearing which I don't think I'm going to get. I may sound paranoid but everyone involved in this grievance (investigator, chairperson, witnesses) are employed by my dad. He is on record as saying he's given my sister executive powers and whatever she says goes basically. No-one is wanting to cross her in case she turns on them next so how can any of this be impartial.

I don't know what to do now. I feel like jacking it in and telling them where to shove their job but financially that would be suicide. Oh to be so hated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd suggest you keep that letter and have a read of the ACAS guidelines.

Don't be tempted to jack it in, let them carry out thier idea of a hearing.

you WILL get your impartial hearing at the subsequent tribunal.

I think they will find thier opinions somewhat at odds with thier responsibilties in law.

Allegations of bullying have to be investigated by the employer for one thing, not proved by the bullied.

As to classing raising a grievance as misconduct. Good luck to them with that one, sounds potentially very expensive to me

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's only if they decide it's malicious I could be disciplined.

 

Today I had a meeting with the office manager to investigate my claims with only 30 minutes notice!

 

Apparently my brother (who is going to chair the grievance hearing) told her that what happened out of work ie.the phone call between my sister and husband are not relevant to the bullying claim and won't be considered!! The whole point of the grievance is based on the call. Surely bullying/harassment can happen anywhere. How can my sister discipline me when she's made it clear she wants me out the business. I think my sister has told my brother to say this but may be wrong.

 

The office manager has also been told by my sister to get dates/times of the incidents. I told her that as it's persistant and ongoing I don't have specific dates.

 

I wonder what Monday will bring.......................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

1, charge the solicitors fees to the business.......

2, hire an independent accountant to go through the books to check that your Sister and Husband are not trying to fleece the company.

3, keep a diary from now on in.

4, do you pay tax on the company car for personal use your p11d from the inland revenue will let you know. if you do the final written warning recieved will not only be invalid but further proof to the bullying and harrassment.

5, your 10% holding is what is keeping her from receiving any holding if your father gives her any holding he is in danger of losing his majority.

6, contact your sisters employer and advise them of her actions. both with coming in once or twice a week is she being paid a fee

and passing this fee to her employer or freelancing in company time? and pocketing the tax free cash with creative accounting.......obviously dont use blackmail if this is the case just use the situation to your advantage, accountants have a strict ethical code to abide to and the inland revenue..

 

Im the suspicious type and get the impression your sister is trying to lay claim to the business once your father retires........even though you have served the family business for 20 years.

OR WORST CASE SCENARIO HAS SOMETHING TO HIDE............................

a criminal always returns to the scene of the crime and once or twice a week does seem excessive to be auditing things,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

 

As a stakeholder you must have access to the audits carried out by your sister as the company accountant.

TURN THE TABLES ON HER IF YOU FIND ANYTHING..............................

Link to post
Share on other sites

1, charge the solicitors fees to the business.......

2, hire an independent accountant to go through the books to check that your Sister and Husband are not trying to fleece the company.

3, keep a diary from now on in.

4, do you pay tax on the company car for personal use your p11d from the inland revenue will let you know. if you do the final written warning recieved will not only be invalid but further proof to the bullying and harrassment.

5, your 10% holding is what is keeping her from receiving any holding if your father gives her any holding he is in danger of losing his majority.

6, contact your sisters employer and advise them of her actions. both with coming in once or twice a week is she being paid a fee

and passing this fee to her employer or freelancing in company time? and pocketing the tax free cash with creative accounting.......obviously dont use blackmail if this is the case just use the situation to your advantage, accountants have a strict ethical code to abide to and the inland revenue..

 

Im the suspicious type and get the impression your sister is trying to lay claim to the business once your father retires........even though you have served the family business for 20 years.

OR WORST CASE SCENARIO HAS SOMETHING TO HIDE............................

a criminal always returns to the scene of the crime and once or twice a week does seem excessive to be auditing things,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

 

As a stakeholder you must have access to the audits carried out by your sister as the company accountant.

TURN THE TABLES ON HER IF YOU FIND ANYTHING..............................

 

Totally agree with what is said above.

 

Also being an owner of my own company. i also have to say, i am deeply supsicious of your sisters actions of coming in once or twice aweek to do accounting. it sounds like you business is based around a shop or garage or similar set up am i right? if so i can tell you now the amount of invoices, credit notes etc and everything else that creates more work for the accountant will be no where near the amount i have each month. It only takes me 1 day (long long day as in early start to late finish) or 2 days at most each month, to do the accounts for my business. although i do use computer based accounting software microsoft office (uk version), which does half the time it takes to do the accounting. but regardless of weather your company uses such software or does it by books, it still will not take more then say 2 days a month or a 3-4 hours aweek if you are doing it by books.

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...