Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
    • OK. Thank you all for the input.  I'll ignore their letters of demand but NEVER ignore a letter of claim. I'm bracing myself for the stress as their demands £££ goes up and the case gets sent to debt collectors. 
    • OK.  It was worth a try. Their case is still pants and they have broken their own Code of Practice numerous times.
    • @BankFodder sorry for the delay and thank you for the lengthy reply. Yes, I agree. It's a small business and the guy is very very decent. I know someone else said my priority shouldn't be worrying whether he gets shafted but I'm not here to try and screw him over because I feel like if someone behaves decently and gets exploited, they might not behave so kindly in the future. I know DX mentioned he thinks I've caused the issue by leaving multiple instructions, but I have already explained why and both instructions were to leave it with a neighbour and there was nothing advising the driver to abandon the parcel on my doorstep. I don't think leaving it there could be considered a safe place.  I am still waiting on the retailer to respond. Ultimately, I wanted to know how he would proceed if DPD's response isn't favourable. I am certainly not looking to cause any problems. I just want my laptop. I will read the other posts for sure. I've been a bit preoccupied with family stuff. I have nothing in writing from DPD as I phoned them, but they did advise it should be the retailer that liaises with them. I tried contacting the driver straight after deliver via Whatsapp, as that's an option, but it said I couldn't send him a message and I have kept that log. We all know who took the parcel on our street, because that person has a history of parcel theft, but I don't have a doorbell camera or cctv. Police are refusing to intervene, despite the fact that I, along with several other people, spotted another's neighbour's parcel in said "suspect's" car and confronted her to get the parcel back. If the police had acted sooner, I might have had a better chance of getting the parcel back, but I suspect the laptop has long been sold on.  When the retailer responds, I will send him the link to this thread. Hopefully, he will benefit from the information on here as well.
    • @dx100uk none of the instructions advised them to leave the parcel on my door step and without such instructions., I'm struggling to see why they think it's ok to just dump it there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sisters Barclaycard debt & HFO


247orbital
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4549 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 133
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The Barclaycard influx is very worrying - if I were BC I would be looking into this and how they can best assist their previous 'customers'. They often 'wash their hands' of it and tell people to contact HFO when it is information from BC that they actually need.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still think the ‘as previously informed’ and ‘reminder notice of assignment’ letters are deliberately misleading.

 

We need to encourage anyone whose first contact is via one of these letters to complain to the OFT. Maybe we should start suggesting sending SARs to HFO to see what letters they reckon they’ve sent previously?

Link to post
Share on other sites

May be worth putting that suggestion into any "stickies" that provide a comprehensive list of what to do when approached by the vermin. Not sure if there IS a sticky for that, and if not it might be worth making one up...or not, dunno just throwing an idea around for myself as well atm

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

would it be possible to do that with the majority of DCA's? Or are there just too many these days?

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

HFO are a particularly nasty DCA amongst nasty DCAs. I am trying to put together the list you suggested based on the advice I keep giving to people but everyone is different so it may vary.

 

If approached by HFO, I always recommend an immediate CCA request, Telephone harassment letter, SAR and telephone calls to Barclaycard and complaints to OFT and Consumer Direct plus CRAs and ICO if they send personal data. NEVER speak to them on the phone unless you can record the calls, log all calls and keep all letters and envelopes. Keep everything in writing.

 

Also Elsa has a good blog on being harassed by DCAs.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Recently wrote to both Experian and Equifax regarding an incorrect default date for an old Barclaycard account. I have confirmation of the original date from BC from a SAR. I sent covering letters and copies of the original default notice to both the CRA.

 

Today Experian responded by saying that after they have contacted HFO they have informed them that the date listed is correct, despite my copy of the default notice being sent to Experian direct. Usual buck passing, they are not responsible etc as customers (HFO) sign an agreement that the information they supply is true and they carry out 200 checks etc etc. So even after being supplied with copies of the OC default date they still take HFO's word with no evidence that the date they list is correct. Experian even sent me the screen shot of the conversation between them and HFO.

I have notified Experian today that I consider them to be in breach of the data protection act and they have a further 14 days to remove the incorrect listing (as its outside the 6 years) or I will take Experian to court for compensation/removal etc.

 

As yet Equifax (who are normally easier to deal with) have not responded.

 

I have also today finally started my long awaited battle with HFO directly, something I tried to avoid by going straight to the CRA's.

 

I have also contacted Barclaycard and asked for an explanation for the delay in the registering the default with the CRA's and copies of all data which was sent to HFO when they purchased the debt. I have already had some information from them as part of a SAR, but to date no CCA or NOA, which I specifically requested. The original 40 days is up and I have given them another 14 days to respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brief outline, HFO have a date of default on my CF I know to be incorrect and the SAR to BC proved this, I have today contacted them after receiving a negative but expected response from Experian.

 

Recently wrote to both Experian and Equifax regarding an incorrect default date for an old Barclaycard account. I have confirmation of the original date from BC from a SAR. I sent covering letters and copies of the original default notice to both the CRA.

 

Today Experian responded by saying that after they have contacted HFO they have informed them that the date listed is correct, despite my copy of the OC default notice being sent to Experian direct. Usual buck passing, they are not responsible etc as customers (HFO) sign an agreement that the information they supply is true and they carry out 200 checks etc etc. So even after being supplied with copies of the OC default date they still take HFO's word with no evidence that the date they list is correct. Experian even sent me the screen shot of the conversation between them and HFO.

I have notified Experian today that I consider them to be in breach of the data protection act and they have a further 14 days to remove the incorrect listing (as its outside the 6 years) or I will take Experian to court for compensation/removal etc.

 

As yet Equifax (who are normally easier to deal with) have not responded.

 

I have also today finally started my long awaited battle with HFO directly, something I tried to avoid by going straight to the CRA's.

 

I have also contacted Barclaycard and asked for an explanation for the delay in the registering the default with the CRA's and copies of all data which was sent to HFO when they purchased the debt. I have already had some information from them as part of a SAR, but to date no CCA or NOA, which I specifically requested. The original 40 days is up and I have given them another 14 days to respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you lodged a formal complaint about the bum chums allowing incorrect data to be placed on your CRF? That will be an easy grand in the bank for libel then, cheers experian....

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No doubt your CRA entries are in the name of HFO Services, yet your Barclaycard was was probally sold to one of the Capitals or even Roxburghe, if this is the case then HFO Services should not be the name on your credit file, they are after all separate legal companies, they know this I have a WS signed by Alisdair Turnbull himself admitting the fact.

 

Last time I looked at my CF HFO Services was still being recorded as the creditor, which is incorrect, have just not been arsed to challenge as HFO gave in against me and my bank have always ignored the entry, as we have a long creditworthy relationship, but it might just be the time to kick up a stink and try and put another nail in the coffin.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also have unresolved issues with Equifax, HFO and the entries on my file (two of them, one Services and the other the OC) but it was banging my head against a brick wall so gave up.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also have unresolved issues with Equifax, HFO and the entries on my file (two of them, one Services and the other the OC) but it was banging my head against a brick wall so gave up.

 

Maybe we should keep banging

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If like me you have proof from the OC that the default date HFO have registered is false they don't have a leg to stand on in my opinion. It just a matter of forcing them into court, which I doubt it would ever come to. They would just claim an admin error etc.

 

Main thing is the CRA's contracts and 200 checks, they allegedly have in place with these companies are not fit for purpose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just a quick update on this, I have had no contact from Experian at all, Equifax have written informing me that they contacted HFO and the information was correct. They even sent a copy of the screen shot of the emails between them and HFO.

I then wrote to HFO (somethiing I tried to avoid) enclosing the a copy of the correct default date from Barclaycard. They wrote back informing me after contacting BC the default HFO had listed was incorrect and it would be removed from my credit files. It all seems a bit to straight forward for my liking, but HFO are quiet at the moment. HFO laid the blame clearly with Barclaycard in the letter for the incorrect data.

I have now written to both Barclaycard and HFO inviting offers of compensation.

 

Updates if and when they come.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update on this, I have had no contact from Equifax at all, Experian have written informing me that they contacted HFO and the information was correct. They even sent a copy of the screen shot of the emails between them and HFO.

 

I then wrote to HFO (something I tried to avoid) enclosing the a copy of the correct default date from Barclaycard. They wrote back informing me after contacting BC the default HFO had listed was incorrect and it would be removed from my credit files. It all seems a bit to straight forward for my liking, but HFO are quiet at the moment. HFO laid the blame clearly with Barclaycard in the letter for the incorrect data.

 

Barclaycard have ignored my last letter completely and to date Equifax who are normally very good have not responded at all

 

I have now written to both Barclaycard and HFO inviting offers of compensation.

 

Updates if and when they come.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should add Equifax into that group, seeing as they failed to carry out the correct checks, and allowed incorrect data to be processed on your file, they are as much to blame as the rest of them!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh don't you worry! There are letters before action ready to go to all of them HFO/Barclaycard/Equifax/Experian. I am being very lenient with time scales as when this does go to court the judge will see they were given ample time and opportunity to respond to my questions etc.

 

and I have an amazing paper trail now which goes back to January 2010 when this matter was first queried by me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...